Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 629

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

Investors are often trained to look for size as a proxy for safety. Blue chips, household names, and index leaders dominate portfolios not only because they feel familiar, but also because of herding bias – the psychological pull to follow the crowd rather than stand apart. But history shows that tomorrow’s champions are often built quietly, well before they attract mainstream attention.

Canva’s rise offers a case in point. Barely more than a decade old, the private design platform is now worth around $65 billion. It is more valuable than Telstra, Brambles, and Rio Tinto – companies that have taken over a century to build. While Canva is exceptional in scale, it highlights a broader trend: founder-led firms with aligned incentives and disciplined cultures will continue to reshape Australia’s corporate landscape.

Why incentives matter

The way leaders are rewarded has a direct impact on the way businesses grow. According to the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, 91% of Australia’s top listed CEOs received a performance bonus last year, typically vesting over three years. This structure often drives short-term priorities.

Founders, in contrast, are rewarded only if their businesses thrive over decades. Their ownership stakes and reputations are tied to long-term outcomes. Their long-term motivation is reflected in bolder decision making, leaner organisational structures, and faster responses to change. For investors, understanding these differences is critical in assessing why some companies compound value more effectively than others.

Telltale signs of founder behaviour

Founder-led firms are not immune from challenges. Some stall, others remain niche, and a few will fail outright. But collectively they demonstrate a pattern of behaviours investors can analyse:

  • Capital discipline: prioritising sustainable margins and reinvestment over empire building.
  • Alignment: boards, executives, and shareholders cohesively building long-term value rather than chase personal gain.
  • Strategic patience: committing to opportunities that compound over decades, even when short-term sentiment resists.
  • Scalable structures: setting up organisation structures that ward off corporate bureaucracy and continue to proliferate the founder’s philosophy

These traits do not guarantee success, but they are observable markers that investors can use when evaluating businesses and management team’s decision-making.

Emerging examples

This mindset is visible across a range of Australian companies. Objective Corporation [ASX:OCL] in government software, Hansen Technologies [ASX:HSN] in specialised software products, and Macquarie Technology Group [ASX:MAQ] in cloud and data services have all grown under founder influence. Private firms such as Expert360 and Lakeba are building new models in talent platforms and applied technology. Even mature names like Technology One [ASX:TNE] retain founder DNA in their culture of customer focus and capital efficiency.


Source: Morningstar.com.au

These are not stock recommendations, but case studies of how founder structures can shape performance. For investors, the lesson is not just which names to watch, but what patterns to recognise when allocating capital.

The takeaway for investors

The next generation of wealth creation is unlikely to come from the obvious megacaps. It is more likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. By the time these companies appear in index products or attract heavy broker coverage, much of the edge is already gone.

Investors who want exposure to this trend need to build frameworks for identifying founder alignment early, before the crowd does. That means going beyond market capitalisation, looking at ownership structures, and assessing the decision-making culture that sits behind the numbers.

 

Lawrence Lam is the author of The Founder Effect (Wiley) and Managing Director of Lumenary Investment Management. He writes on leadership, markets, and the traits that define exceptional management. More at lawrencelam.org and lumenaryinvest.com. The material in this article is general information only and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives. Companies mentioned have been used for illustrative purposes only and do not represent any buy or sell recommendations.

 

  •   17 September 2025
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Nvidia's CEO is selling. Here's why Aussie investors should care

Compare the pair: Expensive versus cheap

Lessons from the rise and fall of founder-led companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.