Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 629

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

Investors are often trained to look for size as a proxy for safety. Blue chips, household names, and index leaders dominate portfolios not only because they feel familiar, but also because of herding bias – the psychological pull to follow the crowd rather than stand apart. But history shows that tomorrow’s champions are often built quietly, well before they attract mainstream attention.

Canva’s rise offers a case in point. Barely more than a decade old, the private design platform is now worth around $65 billion. It is more valuable than Telstra, Brambles, and Rio Tinto – companies that have taken over a century to build. While Canva is exceptional in scale, it highlights a broader trend: founder-led firms with aligned incentives and disciplined cultures will continue to reshape Australia’s corporate landscape.

Why incentives matter

The way leaders are rewarded has a direct impact on the way businesses grow. According to the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, 91% of Australia’s top listed CEOs received a performance bonus last year, typically vesting over three years. This structure often drives short-term priorities.

Founders, in contrast, are rewarded only if their businesses thrive over decades. Their ownership stakes and reputations are tied to long-term outcomes. Their long-term motivation is reflected in bolder decision making, leaner organisational structures, and faster responses to change. For investors, understanding these differences is critical in assessing why some companies compound value more effectively than others.

Telltale signs of founder behaviour

Founder-led firms are not immune from challenges. Some stall, others remain niche, and a few will fail outright. But collectively they demonstrate a pattern of behaviours investors can analyse:

  • Capital discipline: prioritising sustainable margins and reinvestment over empire building.
  • Alignment: boards, executives, and shareholders cohesively building long-term value rather than chase personal gain.
  • Strategic patience: committing to opportunities that compound over decades, even when short-term sentiment resists.
  • Scalable structures: setting up organisation structures that ward off corporate bureaucracy and continue to proliferate the founder’s philosophy

These traits do not guarantee success, but they are observable markers that investors can use when evaluating businesses and management team’s decision-making.

Emerging examples

This mindset is visible across a range of Australian companies. Objective Corporation [ASX:OCL] in government software, Hansen Technologies [ASX:HSN] in specialised software products, and Macquarie Technology Group [ASX:MAQ] in cloud and data services have all grown under founder influence. Private firms such as Expert360 and Lakeba are building new models in talent platforms and applied technology. Even mature names like Technology One [ASX:TNE] retain founder DNA in their culture of customer focus and capital efficiency.


Source: Morningstar.com.au

These are not stock recommendations, but case studies of how founder structures can shape performance. For investors, the lesson is not just which names to watch, but what patterns to recognise when allocating capital.

The takeaway for investors

The next generation of wealth creation is unlikely to come from the obvious megacaps. It is more likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. By the time these companies appear in index products or attract heavy broker coverage, much of the edge is already gone.

Investors who want exposure to this trend need to build frameworks for identifying founder alignment early, before the crowd does. That means going beyond market capitalisation, looking at ownership structures, and assessing the decision-making culture that sits behind the numbers.

 

Lawrence Lam is the author of The Founder Effect (Wiley) and Managing Director of Lumenary Investment Management. He writes on leadership, markets, and the traits that define exceptional management. More at lawrencelam.org and lumenaryinvest.com. The material in this article is general information only and does not consider any individual’s investment objectives. Companies mentioned have been used for illustrative purposes only and do not represent any buy or sell recommendations.

 

  •   17 September 2025
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Nvidia's CEO is selling. Here's why Aussie investors should care

Compare the pair: Expensive versus cheap

Lessons from the rise and fall of founder-led companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Latest Updates

Planning

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Lithium's latest drop and what it means for ASX investors

Lithium's latest sell-off has punished ASX miners as prices remain hostage to shifting expectations. The key challenge is navigating a market prone to extreme volatility despite a strong case for the long-term demand outlook.

Investment strategies

CGT reform and fund turnover: who really feels the impact?

The implications of CGT reform are far and wide. As the 50% discount gives way to inflation indexation, turnover and return profiles may become critical drivers of after-tax performance. Some strategies face a far greater hit.

Superannuation

Super was built for a very different Australia

Our retirement system was built around assumptions that no longer hold. Lower homeownership, longer lifespans and changing expectations are exposing cracks that policymakers and super funds need to address.

Retirement

Retirement in reality - 4 months in

Many people spend years planning financially for retirement but little time preparing for what comes next. Four months in, here are the surprising lessons I've learnt on finding purpose, social connection and healthy habits.

Investment strategies

After the Budget, Australia needs its own definition of quality

As tax reforms reshape investment incentives, investors should rethink what quality investing means in the uniquely concentrated Australian market, where traditional frameworks may not translate as effectively.

Datacenters are the new shale oil

Why are tech giants pouring billions into datacentres when the economics look questionable? The most dangerous words in investing may be: "everyone else is doing it". Today's AI boom has striking parallels with the shale bust.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.