Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 415

The switch is on as the EV revolution approaches

For Formula E motorsport, the 2020-21 racing season was transformational. Seven years after electric single-seaters first raced, Formula E gained the elevated ‘championship’ status enjoyed by Formula 1, World Endurance, World Rally and World Rallycross.

Then came the embarrassment, the ‘absolute catastrophe’, at the Valencia E-Prix in April. The Grande Finale turned shambolic when five appearances by the safety car forced an extra lap and the racers lacked the battery charge to compete at speed. Only nine of 24 qualifiers finished legitimately and three of these drivers crawled to the finish. Three other cars spluttered to a halt mid-last lap when they ran out of charge while five others were disqualified for exceeding energy limits to finish.

The switch is on

Don’t be put off electric cars because an event to showcase the emissions-free driving option highlighted some of the challenges holding back the switch to green cars. In coming decades, electric vehicles are poised to become so reliable they will outsell those propelled by fossil fuels.

Fossil fuel vehicles account for about 10% of the global greenhouse-gas emissions driving climate change. Governments worldwide are promoting or mandating the switch. Automakers have pledged at least US$300 billion to go electric and compete with Tesla Motors, the leader of companies created to build electric.

The race is on to switch to cars whereby an electric motor, battery and single-gear gearbox replace an internal combustion engine, radiator, fuel tank and multi-geared transmission and clutch. Electric cars have only 20 moving parts compared with about 2,000 in fossil-fuel vehicles.

Electric cars versus fossil-fuel vehicles

Source: UAW Research.

But there are challenges to solve

The switch to electric is hampered by the limits to battery power and thus distance. The infrastructure to ensure country-wide charging needs to be built. Another hurdle is that while electric vehicles are simpler to make because they have fewer parts, a battery that is the size of the back seat makes the cars more expensive to produce. The 60% higher price tag on average is slowing sales even though electric car owners save money on energy costs (up to 70%) and maintenance.

Another challenge is that while green cars emit no local pollution their environmental benefits come with caveats. The first is that generating the electricity for recharging produces emissions, although emissions will fall over time as grids use more renewables. A second qualification is that batteries make electric vehicles more emissions-intensive to manufacture. The raw materials needed for battery cells, especially cobalt, lithium and rare earth elements, give off emissions during the smelting process. Thirdly, batteries are a challenge to recycle.

The switch to electric comes with some social costs. The typical electric car requires six times the mineral inputs of fossil-fuel counterparts by weight and securing triple the number of raw materials can be problematic. A notable social cost is that more than 60% of the world’s cobalt supply comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo where children become ill and die mining for US$2 a day to attain the ore. Another possible side effect is that securing the supply of key battery ingredients located in far fewer countries than is oil might add to tensions between the West and China.

Electric cars right now are more a luxury purchase due to their higher price. But already 30% of global sales of mopeds, scooters and motorcycles are electric because the price differential over petrol equivalents is lower. Car sales will trend the same way if the price gap to fossil power is eliminated. Of the three touted future trends in driving – car sharing that makes ownership redundant, fully autonomous driving and electric vehicles – a world of green cars is the most believable.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

The role of alternatives

To be sure, more advancements in the fuel economy of fossil fuels would reduce the case for electric vehicles. A halfway switch to hybrids might slow the switch to fully electric while unexpected leaps in hydrogen power could make electric cars passé. Governments might wind back green subsidies to repair their finances (especially as some will lose revenue from fuel excise). Any delay in battery improvements would slow the switch. Banning conventional cars might misfire if the masses can’t afford electric.

While the pace of the switch is debatable, the world of electric cars is coming. Valencia E-Prix debacles aside, the breakthrough into mainstream should prove as seamless as the switch from manual to automatic.

 

Michael Collins is an Investment Specialist at Magellan Asset Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only, not investment advice. For the full version of this article and to view sources, go to: https://www.magellangroup.com.au/insights/.

For more articles and papers from Magellan, please click here.

 

9 Comments
john
July 12, 2021

Slightly off topic. The accelerated rise in world population over the last 100 years is the root cause of all the environmental issues. Even though most western countries are below replacement birth rates. You only have to look at the graphs. The countries causing most of this issue are those that forever continually export their people to the rest of the world. 

Arthur Hunt
July 11, 2021

Thi sarticle and following comments ignore the double economic benefit to Australia. First a huge reduction in cost of importing liquid fuels and the use of domestic electricity supplies instead, and secondly, the potential demand for battery minerals from Australia, incluidng nickel, manganese, cobalt and lithium. They also ignore the incredible efficiency of electric vehicles due to regeneration of power as they slow down or descend hills - nearly 50% 0f energy used ot climb a hill is regained down the other side. My Tesla uses the energy equivalent of 1.9 litres of petrol per 100 km. I may use some coal-fired power, but not much of it and getting less as the grid goes greener.

Marjorie
July 11, 2021

The challenges of recycling battery parts and harvesting/reusing the mineral components plus the smelting issue in the supply chain not to mention the modern slavery issue and health costs of mining the critical minerals used in batteries are not being given nearly enough attention. These are expensive to solve. The focus is going to be more and more on these factors given ESG agendas - and these problems do need to be solve for mainstream EV acceptance. So whoever can do that will be a big winner - and the world will win too.

Tony Dillon
July 11, 2021

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that there will be 140 million EVs by 2030, about 7% of the global car fleet. But this will not put a significant dent in global emissions. First, generating the electricity they require to run, mostly means greenhouse gases being emitted. And producing the huge batteries also generates CO2 emissions. In fact, an EV has a huge carbon deficit before it even hits the road. It has been estimated that it will only start saving on emissions after being driven about 60,000km.

And by 2030, the IEA estimates that EVs will reduce global emissions by only 190 million tonnes of CO2, or just 0.4% of total global emissions.

By all means we should encourage EVs for a cleaner world. But allow the take-up to be market driven without subsidies. As IEA director Fatih Birol said, “If you think you can save the climate with electric cars, you're completely wrong.”

Ian
July 12, 2021

As you would expect a completely fossil fuel biased IEA to say..... Just wrong on so many counts, not least of which is the 7% by 2030! I will give you 5 to 1 on the under.... Will probably be 7% in 2025, and more like 50% by 2030. And just about every EV manufacturer would love to operate with no subsidies, as long as we stop all those going to fossil fuels, and we put a true price on carbon emissions!

Phil Hocking
July 11, 2021

Governments need to articulate the benefits of EV’s in reducing emissions and the fact that they will be a huge reservoir of energy storage available to assist the electricity grid.
An easier way to get more EV’s into the country would be to introduce an emissions standard. Currently Australia does not have an emissions standard for CO2. We need one.

John Smith
July 08, 2021

The electric vehicles (EVs) market is witnessing one of the hottest revolutions, which has the potential to shape the future of the entire world. With growing concerns over environmental issues such as global warming, high carbon footprints, usage of fossil fuels as a source of energy, the clean energy space has been gaining traction rapidly. Electric vehicle manufacturers are trying to address these environmental issues by manufacturing vehicles that run on clean energy. Australia has a rich history of a resources-based economy and hence its only that natural for Australian investors (who are already taking a shine to the EV market), to think of all the resources and metals that EVs need, be it power stations or lithium for batteries.

Dean Tipping
July 08, 2021

Pyrford International in their Q1 2020 and Q2 2021 notes titled "Pyrspectives" take a look at EV's. The Q1 2020 note quoted the Wall Street Journal; "each electric car will require the processing of 230,000kg (230 metric tons) of raw materials. Even if this proves to be an overestimate there's still going to be a lot of digging required." Pyrford drove them and loved them but concluded thus; "don't drive it out of the showroom thinking that you are helping to save the planet. It's not making a scintilla of difference." I guess time will tell in the meantime, folks can make up their own mind...

Bakker
July 11, 2021

Very well said Dean…it is something the” Short Thinkers” don’t realise as they embrace unconditionally and unquestionably the move to EV. We all want to reduce the carbon footprint ,however it will not happen overnight even with the best intent and there will be unintended consequences along the way.
Having said that, there will be another side benefit to going EV , that being a big reduction in noise pollution .

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Ignore solar parity at your investing peril

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.