Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 119

The upside of fintech for wealth managers

Fintech has captured the imagination of many financial services firms looking to leverage differentiating technology to accelerate their innovation. Nowhere is that more true than within the wealth and asset management sector.

Increasingly, financial services organisations are becoming technology services providers. While fintechs are seen by many as disruptive to traditional financial services businesses, in reality they present great opportunities for savvy organisations.

The early impact of fintech has already been felt by the banking sector, where traditionally large value chains and highly visible, commoditised products made it ripe for disruption. Bitcoin was an early mover and progress has also been relentless in peer-to-peer lending, with a range of new market offerings launched. Banks have found themselves on the back foot, forced to adapt to compete with new challengers.

There are clear lessons here for the wealth and asset management industry. Looking at how disruption has driven new cost models and customer experience in the banking sector can help create a framework for wealth managers’ adoption strategies. One message in particular stands out: disrupt yourself and do it now.

Why now?

Wealth and asset managers have so far enjoyed a level of insulation from fintech disruption. This has been the result of two key factors. Firstly, wealth and asset managers operate in a highly regulated, formal market. By its nature, this environment makes it hard for start-ups to get a foothold. Secondly, the nature of wealth and asset management products means they are not something that a typical consumer uses on a daily basis. Asset management operates differently from a cash or credit transaction. This level of complexity has made it difficult for start-ups to target the core factory of a wealth management firm. But, while these factors have provided a degree of security to date, there is no doubt that the value chain for the wealth and asset management industry is under threat.

Traditional and emergent fintechs

Traditional fintechs are large, established technology companies. They have built up industry knowledge over time, understand start-up principles and have the existing technology and a well-funded community of developers to support their aspirations.

The major upside with these large companies is their high visibility. There are opportunities here for wealth and asset management firms to form strategic partnerships that ensure they will be at the forefront of the wave of technology adoption these large players are driving.

The second type of fintechs are innovative firms with specific intermediation strategies. These are the disrupters with the ability to put elements of the traditional wealth management value chain under immediate threat. While it is unlikely these start-ups will steal core business in the short term due to the barriers mentioned earlier, the opportunities are immense and there is likely to be some consolidation in the market.

Low cost transaction platforms

As regulators apply continued pressure on increasing fee transparency across the industry, organisations with higher operating costs will become less attractive to consumers. The winners will be wealth managers who are adaptable, agile and have low cost models. These platforms are highly disruptive as the fee models are low and simple to understand. Most consumers want to maximise returns without passing income to the asset manager. In some overseas markets, new entrants have changed the revenue structure to leverage the inherent value in consumer data, rather than the trading fee. Under this model, they are able to employ aggressive advertising campaigns and upsell to other revenue-driving products.

If fintechs can cause a degree of intermediation in the value chain which reduces cost, then adopting a business model which uses the same or similar delivery models could be the strategic shift needed for an early adopter to change the game.

Transactional versus relationships

Fintech providers target two different types of client. The first is the transactional client, who is often defined by a fee for service arrangement. This type of client benefits from innovative technologies in self-service advice, payment processing and automated account management. The second type of client is relationship-based. They seek an ongoing personal relationship with their planner. Fintech can be used to enhance this relationship via integrated multi-channel communication, single customer view and ongoing risk mitigation.

Consumer experience and data analytics are key

The level of service consumers expect from their wealth and asset management providers is changing. Some new entrants in markets such as New Zealand are already capitalising on this, using real-time video chat and digitalised documentation to engage with their customers on hosted platforms. This solution is scalable and offers immense back-office opportunity, the capacity to reduce storage costs and paper use, restructure the organisation and bring increased efficiencies to the wealth management business model. It also has the added advantage of providing an immediate improvement in customer experience.

Other start-ups are experimenting with the use of social media insights to provide predictive analytics. Done well, this can provide the ability to determine emerging market sentiment and identify which stocks are going to become buy or sell opportunities ahead of the traditional stock market. It can allow for new types of risk management strategies and profiles to be defined, enabling wealth managers to respond to market sentiment and redress and balance the investment mix in their portfolio before anyone else. In a highly competitive market, adopting a solution like this could help attract new customers by maximising returns and improving the investment profile.

Mega-algorithms are coming

The rise of the robo-advisor is imminent, with pilots already running in Australia. Robo-advisors have the potential to impact the industry’s entire investment and scaled advice model, by turning the handling of consumer-managed portfolios into a computer-driven process. Considering how the use of robo-advisor models could change the way the wealth and asset manager advisory workforce is managed going into the next few years, wealth managers will need to deal with this level of change. Otherwise they may find their customers choosing the reliability and predictability robo-advisors can bring to their financial planning needs at a fraction of the cost, and switching to a competitor.

The way forward

Fintech will change wealth and asset management behaviour, and soon. The current regulatory framework provides some level of insulation, but the industry is not immune from market disruption. Preparing for the change requires new ways of thinking and a strategy, plus an operating model to support it. By taking a global view of what is happening in other markets and across the broader financial services sector, Australian wealth and asset managers can position themselves to capitalise on the opportunities fintech presents.

 

Anita Kimber is an advisory partner in EY’s Oceania Financial Services Office.

The views expressed in this article are the views of the author, not Ernst & Young. The article provides general information, does not constitute advice and should not be relied on as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Results of roboadvice survey

What are all these fintech startups actually doing?

Other articles on ‘wealth disruption’

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.