Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 251

Three reasons why current dividends matter

Recent headlines on dividends have been primarily focused on the proposed removal of some of the more favourable tax treatments if the Labor Party secures government. While franking credits certainly enhance the attraction of dividends for many investors, we believe there are other reasons why the dividend income earned from an equity portfolio is an important element to consider when constructing an equity portfolio.

There are three key reasons why dividends have always been an important component for investors:

1. Dividends are a more reliable source of return than capital gains

Returns from equities come from two sources – capital appreciation and the dividends received from the shares held.

The returns from the S&P/ASX300 of these two components over the last 20 and 40 years are:

Source: Calculated using IRESS data indices

The importance of the dividend component of an Australian equity portfolio to investors is evident: around half of the returns of the S&P/ASX300 in the last 20 and 40 years have come from dividends.

2. The level of dividends received is not affected by the level of the sharemarket

While the level of capital returns from an equity portfolio over any defined period generally depends on the movement in the sharemarket, the level of dividends is dependent on the performance of the underlying companies, not the movement in share prices.

The level of dividends and the dividend payout ratio of any company is set by the Board of the company. It is generally a reflection of the overall profitability of a company and is independent on the level of its share price.

An investor’s level of dividends from a diversified portfolio – if made up of quality companies with the right attributes – should not vary greatly from year to year and is irrelevant to what is happening on the overall sharemarket, including during price falls.

Over the past 20 years, for the S&P/ASX300, the volatility of capital returns was 12.6% and dividend volatility was 1.0%.

Chart 1: volatility of returns of capital and income of the S&P/ASX 300 over 20 years

Source: IML, S&PASX300 31/03/1998 – 31/03/2018

Chart 1 shows that the volatility of capital returns has been high over the last 20 years, which is not surprising perhaps as it contains periods such as the tech boom and bust, the GFC, and the Eurozone crisis. However, the volatility of the dividends for an investor in the S&P/ASX300 has been very low.

This trend is true also on a year on year basis. Chart 2 shows the breakdown of the level of returns from the S&P/ASX300. The level of dividends paid (the orange bar) has been much less volatile than the level of capital returns (the blue bar) over the last 20 years.

Chart 2: Returns to shareholders over the past 20 years

Click to enlarge. Source: IML and Morningstar Direct, S&P/ASX 300 01/01/1998 – 31/12/2017

Regardless of share price performance, the vast majority of companies in the S&P/ASX300 continue to pay dividends which to some extent compensates sharemarket investors for a share price often beholden to the whims of the market.

3. The dividend yield on stocks can act as a ‘safety net’

The movement in the sharemarket – particularly over shorter periods of 6 to 12 months - is often driven by market sentiment. This in itself is affected by predictions as to the future level of economic activity, inflation, and interest rates, as well as perceptions of geopolitical stability.

Often, minor events in hindsight from an economic standpoint can cause the mood of investors to sour markedly and lead to large declines in the sharemarket. For example, Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1991 led to gloomy predictions about an impending global recession by many market analysts and economists.

A perceived crisis can cause many investors to panic, and the prices of shares can fall heavily initially, often indiscriminately and independent of their quality. Once the panic subsides, companies with sustainable earnings that can support a healthy dividend stream are often the shares that can recover the quickest.

The reason for this is fairly obvious. Rational long-term investors are always attracted to companies that pay a healthy dividend from a sustainable earnings stream. Once shares in quality companies fall to a level where the dividend yield is attractive, long-term investors buy these shares to ‘lock in’ attractive dividend yields, despite a volatile sharemarket.

Conclusion

Dividends provide sharemarket investors with a consistent part of their total return and can also act as a ‘safety net’ in down markets.

While the proposed changes to the tax-effective treatment of dividends in Australia via franking credits is potentially a negative development, dividends will remain an important factor when investing in the sharemarket. They will continue to provide investors with a relatively stable part of returns through the delivery of real cash flow, irrespective of the market cycle.

Fundamentals should remain crucial to deciding which companies ought to be included in a portfolio - mainly the quality and transparency of the earnings, cash flow generation, gearing levels, or balance sheet strength – which ultimately determines the level of dividends.

 

Anton Tagliaferro is Investment Director at Investors Mutual Limited. This information is general in nature and has been prepared without taking into account of the objectives, financial situation, or needs of any investor.

 

  •   3 May 2018
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Doubling down on dividends

Not all income is created equal

The role of shareholder yield in a portfolio

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.