Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 222

What do investors value in financial advice?

Challenged on one front by robots and on the other by a general reluctance among the wider public to pay for advice, some financial planners have been experiencing an existential crisis in recent years.

One obvious response among advice firms has been to fight the technology-led commodification of advice by going for scale, cutting costs and industrialising processes as much as feasible. A second response has been for advisers to stop and ask themselves exactly what it is that investors (or at least those willing to pay for financial advice) feel they value most from the human side of the service. A third response, and one pursued in a new global survey, is to ask investors themselves what they value.

The survey of almost 19,000 investors (clients of 436 participating firms in eight countries) by Dimensional Fund Advisers offers insights for firms reflecting on what they can offer and charge for beyond what’s available in an app.

Investment returns rank below security and peace of mind

The most notable outcome of the survey, which covered Australia, New Zealand, the US, Canada, the UK and Europe, was that investment returns rank well below other more qualitative factors for end investors. Asked how they primarily measure the value they receive from their adviser, investors’ most cited benefit was a sense of security and peace of mind, which was the top value among 35% of respondents. Second on the list was the adviser’s knowledge of their personal financial situation (23%), followed by a sense of making progress toward their goals (20%). Investment returns came in fourth among the key benefits at 14%. While all this might seem predictable at first glance, it’s arguable whether many financial planning firms really position themselves primarily in that light, as wealth counsellors and behavioural mentors.

While advisors may be tempted to promote their value as ‘generating good returns’, the real value they offer is getting clients to where they want to go. Returns are part of that, of course, but the advisor’s main value-add is keeping clients focused on the areas within their control. Promising ‘good returns’ only means having to explain when markets don’t deliver.

For instance, a financial plan that involves taking big risks in volatile assets whose ups and downs are more than the client can comfortably live with is probably not going to be a successful plan in delivering on the goal. In contrast, a plan that works within the clients’ risk preferences that allows them to sleep at night and that is built according to their own lifestyle and circumstances may be more successful, even if short-term returns are less eye-catching.

In other words, the destination is more achievable if the journey is tolerable. And that’s the value proposition for advisers that surfaced in this survey.

What can be controlled?

According to Dimensional’s co-CEO and Head of Global Financial Adviser Services, Dave Butler, the value that investors place on a sense of security is really an outcome of advisers setting the right expectations with each client. “By helping clients understand what they can and cannot control, advisers can create a different experience to help ease their concerns,” Butler says. The importance of the day-to-day experience also came through in answers to the question about what attribute investors consider most important in the adviser relationship. Of the survey sample, 31% cited the client service experience, while 26% said they ranked the adviser’s experience with clients like themselves.

With Australia’s superannuation system moving away from a lump sum to a retirement income goal, the survey’s findings were revealing. Asked to identify the most valuable retirement planning information they receive, 28% of respondents cited knowing how much they will be able to afford to spend each year, ranking ahead of the total amount they will have for retirement (22%). Correspondingly, the single most cited fear about personal finances was not having enough to live on comfortably in retirement (37%), followed by experiencing a significant loss in a market downturn (31%).

 

Jim Parker is Regional Director, Communications, for Dimensional Fund Advisors in Sydney. Dimensional has 12 offices in eight countries and global assets under management of AUD675 billion as at 30 June 2017.

 

  •   12 October 2017
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Super is catching up, but ageing is a triple-threat

Work still needed to close the financial gender gap

The link between financial and mental health

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.