Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 308

What now for SMSFs and hybrids?

Well, that was unexpected. The election delivered a revolt against Labor's franking credit policy. Prior to the election, we thought there would be little influence on the hybrid market because there was sufficient demand outside the affected investors to soak up the next few years of supply. If and when SMSFs did react to the policy, their biggest issue was their franked equity portfolio. Equity allocations are much larger in most SMSF portfolios.

At time of writing, the bank component of the Elstree Hybrid Index is up around 0.5% compared to the 9% increase in the S&P/ASX200 Bank Index. The hybrid return is only just in the top 5% of two-day returns over the last 10 years. Given that the election outcome was clearly unexpected, it indicates there are not yet a lot of pension SMSF investors returning to the market.

Ignore us and think long term

When it comes to hybrids, investors should consider our short-term guesses as next to useless for the simple reason that we believe hybrids should be a component of most income portfolio. Investors should be insensitive to 1%-2% price movements because of the favourable characteristics hybrids bring to portfolios:

  • Cash rates are going to 1% and term deposit rates will be around 1.5% in a few months.
  • The hybrid return of cash rates +3% or so is close to equity market returns over the long term and equivalent to income returns from high yield bonds or loan funds.
  • Hybrids are not volatile except in big equity market drawdowns. Since the GFC, we’ve seen 20% decreases in equity markets and a maximum 3% drawdown in hybrids.
  • Hybrid return weakness is short term.
  • The risk factors and pattern of returns are uncorrelated to both equities and other income categories. High yield bonds and loan funds are more highly correlated to equities in a statistical and fundamental sense and if (and when) we do get a recession, they are more likely to fall by more than 10%.
  • Hybrids are liquid, with a few exceptions. Other higher-yielding income categories have unproven liquidity and are probably lobster pots (easy to get into, impossible to get out of). In stress, they will trade below their doubtful NAVs.

It's worth understanding Sharpe ratios

We’ll get a bit techie here, but the concept of risk-adjusted return is easy to understand. You want to earn more for investing in risky investments, if only because lots of volatility upsets investors and they sell at the wrong time. The Sharpe ratio measures the extra return for extra risk and is expressed as a ratio. If it is positive, it means that you have received extra return for the extra risk and the more positive the better. In the chart below, we show the Sharpe ratios for the Elstree Enhanced Income Fund (including franking credits but excluding fees) and the All Ords Accumulation Index over the past 10 years. We use the rolling 3-year ratio as a good timeframe over which to judge investments.

So, what does that tell us?

Since the GFC (when hybrid margins rose from the 1% pre GFC to average about 3.5% since), equities have returned 7.7% per annum compared to the Elstree Enhanced Income Fund (EEIF) return of 6.8% p.a. But because hybrids don’t have the annual 10% ups and downs that equities experience, the Fund has a Sharpe ratio of 1, which is twice as good as Australian equities.

Investors considering hybrids should take comfort from the following features:

  • Sustainable returns that aren’t much below prospective equity returns and well above cash.
  • Structurally lower risk than equities, and reasonable prospective risk (although lower than senior debt and subordinated debt in the capital structure).
  • Structurally different risk factors than other non-cash and bond asset classes.

Hydrids can be complex in structure and investors should consider the features of any instrument or fund before committing capital, but at least the threat of a removal of franking credit refunds from SMSFs has been removed.

 

Campbell Dawson and Norman Derham are Executive Directors of Elstree Investment Management, a boutique fixed income fund manager. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual investor.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The fascinating bank hybrid journey of the last year

Hybrids alongside corporate bonds a good balance

Let's refocus the active v passive debate

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.