Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 240

Asset class and portfolio management skills are different

Technology is having a profound impact on our access to information and our ability to transact has made investing easier, yet ironically, more difficult.

Our expectations of investment managers are higher, our reliance on their professionalism increasing. Mandatory superannuation means that balances are getting larger, mandates are broader, and institutional investors are shouldering increasing responsibility for investor outcomes.

Endowments, charities, and family offices are required to be more transparent and longer term focussed. At the same time, we are living longer, while average super balances are low, which means self-funding is imperative for many of us.

The problem is that, as in any field of endeavour, with evolution comes the need for greater specialisation. And one of the most important specialist skills is the ability to manage a portfolio as a whole, in many cases via multiple investment managers. This is different from the ability to successfully invest in different asset classes individually.

It is often argued that portfolio management, in the form of asset allocation, is the largest determinant of long-term investment performance. The question now is whether investment managers have the skills required to successfully navigate a sea of changing financial imperatives. And whether asset owners have the skills to oversee them.

What standard should you expect of investment managers? And how do we define and monitor standards?

Portfolio management goes well beyond financial advice or analysis

The challenge of successfully managing an investment portfolio goes beyond making a series of good individual investment decisions. Analysts analyse data and risks and give opinions based on the results. This is a fundamentally different skill from the ability to think about overall risk the right way. That is the job of the portfolio manager, who must be able to identify risks including externalities such as material environmental, social, and governance risks.

The skill of the portfolio manager lies in the ability to structure a portfolio so that unforeseen events do not result in the loss of the entire, or even a significant portion, of the fund. And that can mean managing interactions between a number of underlying managers to ensure diversification and correlation.

Portfolio management skills require specialist training, including tracking the progress of investments, knowing when to sell and how to get the mix right at any point in time. More of us are assuming we can take on this role of building portfolios. The major superannuation funds obviously do it, but so do SMSF trustees, Family Offices, and even individual investors.

We all have a responsibility to make good decisions. In the case of institutional investors, decisions have far-reaching consequences - the influence on corporate Australia, the performance of individual asset classes, and on individual investor outcomes can’t be overstated.

How do we achieve the necessary level of professionalism?

The short answer is a robust qualification with the requirements for ongoing maintenance and work.

Qualifications such as CFP and CFA remain vital, but a portfolio management qualification is needed to fill the gap:

  • The qualification should be international and set the bar for investment managers involved in any aspect of constructing multi-manager portfolios.
  • It must require rigorous ongoing CPD points.
  • Ethics must be a major part of the qualification, as ethics drive conduct and conduct drives outcomes.
  • ESG is no longer a ‘nice to have’; climate change, for example, is increasingly posing a real risk to financial stability.

We are at a point in the evolution of portfolio management and portfolio governance. Specialisation is now essential. With investors living longer and usually relying on retirement savings for many decades, the consequences of poor decisions are serious and the expectations of stakeholders higher than ever.

 

Pauline Vamos is the chair of CIMA Society of Australia (formerly IMCA Australia) and also the CEO of Regnan Governance Research & Engagement. She was CEO of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) between 2007 and 2016.

8 Comments
Jonathan Hoyle
February 25, 2018

Pauline, a couple of observations.
i) You are right to separate the need for specialist portfolio management skills from the current debate to raise the education standards of financial advisers. ASIC has surprisingly made few comments on the minimum portfolio construction skills needed by a financial adviser.

ii) The CFA is the gold-standard qualification for portfolio managers. It is hard and has a high failure rate. No other designation or qualification is required. The CFP is the gold standard for financial advisers; but it is not a rigorous money management designation.

iii) Regulatory overkill reduces supply and raises prices for consumers. We should think carefully before we all advocate more qualifications.

iv) The primary job of a portfolio manager running money for their clients is to maximise returns for a given level of risk. This is done by investing in companies that abide by the laws and ethics of the land. ESG/SRI/Green investing etc muddies these waters. For example, the most cost effective and proven way to deal with the very real issue of climate change is to build nuclear reactors. But with nuclear power, comes many other risks.

Angus McLeod
February 18, 2018

I agree with Steve that the CIMA is unfortunately named.

I am both CFA- and CIMA-qualified and on many occasions I've been asked about my "time in the UK". Additionally I have recommended the CIMA course to colleagues and then seen them looking at the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants web site for information.

I'm not sure that much can be done to rectify this situation now that CIMA has started to attain a foothold locally and its society has just formalised its name.

Pauline Vamos
February 15, 2018

CIMA is very much positioned between a CFP and CFA qualification. There is a growing number of planners who are constructing portfolios for retired clients, family offices and endowments and need more than a CPA. The qualification is quite flexible and suits the increasing range of people involved in multi manager portfolio governance (trustees and investment committees) and portfolio risk assessors including ESG risks. The world is changing rapidly, so the qualification evolves in line with changes in the investment landscape. Not many qualifications require on-going qualification - CIMA's remain relevant because only certified continuing education is accepted. CFP Certification and CFA Certification remain vital, but a portfolio management qualification to fill the gap is needed,

DAVID HANCOCK
February 15, 2018

For my two bobs worth, I have experienced the benefits and disasters of a portfolio manager/financial adviser.

Subsequent to the GFC, I learnt that anyone with a bit of insight in the share market, could make money from shares. However, during a bear market, these people dropped down to the same level of share market investing knowledge as myself - very little. They increased share buying and selling due to falling low prices, having no idea of when to put the breaks on.

I would rather a portfolio manager/financial adviser to have a plan B and be willing to sacrifice their own brokerage profits by having safeguards on their clients money.

It is good to read someone with portfolio manager concern: 'The skill of the (proven) portfolio manager lies in the ability to structure a portfolio so that unforeseen events do not result in the loss of the entire, or even a significant portion.' This is more important than having a portfolio manager/financial adviser making a portfolio gain of a few percentage points above their peers. I would add 'proven' to this statement.

Steve
February 14, 2018

What qualification is desired outside of a CFA? It's practically designed for portfolio managers. The CFP on the other hand, is for financial advisers who like to outsource the investment decision.

Todd
February 15, 2018

Following on from Pauline's comment...CIMA certification fits uniquely in the clear and uncluttered space between the CFA program – which is perhaps best suited to those who primarily design portfolios of individual securities – and the CFP program – which is perhaps best suited to those who give broad-based financial planning advice.

In other words, CIMA certification is specialised and is ideally suited to investment management analysts/advisers - both practitioners and advocates - involved in any aspect of constructing multi-manager portfolios. Check it out here: https://portfolioconstructionforum.edu.au/cima/about-cima/

Steve
February 16, 2018

I must say, when you mentioned CIMA my first thought was of the very well-known Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, which while it is a very significant qualification, obviously has nothing to do with portfolio management. Have you considered changing it to something else?

David
February 14, 2018

Agree formal qualifications in portfolio management may be useful. So would qualifications in retirement outcomes, being a CEO of a super fund, member engagement and education, and so on ...

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

10 checkpoints before setting up an SMSF

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.