Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 312

We have many world best practice companies

Overall, Australia’s businesses are way below world best practice (WBP) when it comes to profitability and have been for decades. Average returns on shareholder funds after tax (ROSF or Return on Investment, ROI) across the nation’s 2.3 million businesses have averaged just 3.7% over the past three decades (compared with the 10-year government bond rate averaging 5.5% over that period), although with a better 4.2% in 2018. Our largest 2,000 corporations averaged 6.9% ROI, and our Best 100 did a little better at 8%. The WBP level is 22%.

What do we mean by world best practice?

In this article, I have treated WBP as a company profitability level above 22% ROI, not a single 'best' as we might do with best practice in other comparisons (such as OH&S, triple bottom line, stakeholder action). Even with best practice processes and products there are often subtle if not significant differences.

It's instructive to see how WBP has evolved through the ages of economic progress.

  • The Agrarian Age, up to the late 18th century. WBP profitability was probably around the 10-year bond rate of about 5.5%.
  • The Industrial Age, up to the mid 1960s. WBP profitability was around double the bond rate, at about 11%.
  • The current Infotronics Age, to the middle of the 21st century. WBP profitability has doubled again to 22%. The added returns come from intellectual property, brand strength, culture, etc, which often remain off balance sheet although shareholders accept them as real in valuing a company. The massive change has been in the value of intellectual property ahead of the audited net assets.

Global performance comparisons

All of the ROI averages of Australian companies stated in the first paragraph are just over half the averages in the USA.

However, Australia had more than one in 10 of our largest 2,000 - that account for 46% of the nation’s $5.3 trillion revenue in 2018 - achieving WBP of 22% in ROI terms over the 3-year period to 2018. Sadly, three in 10 lost money over the same period.

We see the same performance gap in our 30 largest listed stocks (by market capitalisation) compared with the 30 largest NYSE-listed stocks (the Dow Jones Index list) below.

So, a lot of share portfolios and SMSFs have become more heavily weighted into US equities in recent times (directly or via managed funds and ETFs). That has been a no-brainer when one sees the diversity of performance between the All Ordinaries, S&P500 and NASDAQ in the next chart.

Tell us some good news about Australia

But, as always, there is good news as well as sobering news as shown below.

world best practice

Some 42 companies in the Best 100 Listed Stocks achieved or bettered the WBP of 22% ROI in the three years to 2018, and the weighted average of the 100 was a commendable 18.9%.

The good performance took place across all five industry sectors with the toughest sector - the secondary sector of manufacturing, utilities and construction - performing best. Most of the 100 Best were focused companies with only five being diversified, and even they were theme conglomerates rather than dangerous classic conglomerates which all fail eventually.

The best news of all is when we look at the Best 50 Listed companies over a 5-year period to 2018, and compare their weighted performance with the All Ordinaries Index, as below.

world best practice

A million dollars invested in the Best 50 five years ago would have yielded a capital value of $2.5 million by 2018, a 30% pa return, plus dividends. The All Ords would have been worth just $1.15 million plus dividends.

Our Best 50 not only outpaced the S&P500, but also the NASDAQ. It would seem fundamentals do matter.

 

Phil Ruthven is Founder of the Ruthven Institute, Founder of IBISWorld and widely-recognised as Australia’s leading futurist.

A full 40-page online Summary of the latest Business Performance results is available from www.ruthven.institute along with a staggering amount of other strategic information.

RELATED ARTICLES

Why stock prices are a distraction

Is the speculative fever in 'hot stocks’ over?

Gullible travels, or are Aussies more sceptical?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.