Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 312

We have many world best practice companies

Overall, Australia’s businesses are way below world best practice (WBP) when it comes to profitability and have been for decades. Average returns on shareholder funds after tax (ROSF or Return on Investment, ROI) across the nation’s 2.3 million businesses have averaged just 3.7% over the past three decades (compared with the 10-year government bond rate averaging 5.5% over that period), although with a better 4.2% in 2018. Our largest 2,000 corporations averaged 6.9% ROI, and our Best 100 did a little better at 8%. The WBP level is 22%.

What do we mean by world best practice?

In this article, I have treated WBP as a company profitability level above 22% ROI, not a single 'best' as we might do with best practice in other comparisons (such as OH&S, triple bottom line, stakeholder action). Even with best practice processes and products there are often subtle if not significant differences.

It's instructive to see how WBP has evolved through the ages of economic progress.

  • The Agrarian Age, up to the late 18th century. WBP profitability was probably around the 10-year bond rate of about 5.5%.
  • The Industrial Age, up to the mid 1960s. WBP profitability was around double the bond rate, at about 11%.
  • The current Infotronics Age, to the middle of the 21st century. WBP profitability has doubled again to 22%. The added returns come from intellectual property, brand strength, culture, etc, which often remain off balance sheet although shareholders accept them as real in valuing a company. The massive change has been in the value of intellectual property ahead of the audited net assets.

Global performance comparisons

All of the ROI averages of Australian companies stated in the first paragraph are just over half the averages in the USA.

However, Australia had more than one in 10 of our largest 2,000 - that account for 46% of the nation’s $5.3 trillion revenue in 2018 - achieving WBP of 22% in ROI terms over the 3-year period to 2018. Sadly, three in 10 lost money over the same period.

We see the same performance gap in our 30 largest listed stocks (by market capitalisation) compared with the 30 largest NYSE-listed stocks (the Dow Jones Index list) below.

So, a lot of share portfolios and SMSFs have become more heavily weighted into US equities in recent times (directly or via managed funds and ETFs). That has been a no-brainer when one sees the diversity of performance between the All Ordinaries, S&P500 and NASDAQ in the next chart.

Tell us some good news about Australia

But, as always, there is good news as well as sobering news as shown below.

world best practice

Some 42 companies in the Best 100 Listed Stocks achieved or bettered the WBP of 22% ROI in the three years to 2018, and the weighted average of the 100 was a commendable 18.9%.

The good performance took place across all five industry sectors with the toughest sector - the secondary sector of manufacturing, utilities and construction - performing best. Most of the 100 Best were focused companies with only five being diversified, and even they were theme conglomerates rather than dangerous classic conglomerates which all fail eventually.

The best news of all is when we look at the Best 50 Listed companies over a 5-year period to 2018, and compare their weighted performance with the All Ordinaries Index, as below.

world best practice

A million dollars invested in the Best 50 five years ago would have yielded a capital value of $2.5 million by 2018, a 30% pa return, plus dividends. The All Ords would have been worth just $1.15 million plus dividends.

Our Best 50 not only outpaced the S&P500, but also the NASDAQ. It would seem fundamentals do matter.

 

Phil Ruthven is Founder of the Ruthven Institute, Founder of IBISWorld and widely-recognised as Australia’s leading futurist.

A full 40-page online Summary of the latest Business Performance results is available from www.ruthven.institute along with a staggering amount of other strategic information.

RELATED ARTICLES

Best-in-class, ‘pure-play’ companies give clearer focus

Changing landscape of US large and mid caps

Single-period measures do not work for great growth companies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.