Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 283

Australia tops Asia-Pacific for property investment

Melbourne and Sydney have placed first and third as the most popular destinations to invest in commercial property in the Asia-Pacific region in 2019.

Australia’s strong underlying economic growth combined with high yields relative to other Asia-Pacific markets, good prospects for rental growth and market transparency are driving continued domestic and global investor interest in the Melbourne and Sydney commercial property markets according to the latest results from the ULI/PwC 2019 industry survey[1].

Relative yields are important

Although yields in Australia are close to record lows (circa 4.75% - 5.0% for high quality office and retail, and 5.5% for high quality industrial), they remain higher than those in other Asia-Pacific gateways. Hong Kong and Tokyo yields are now below 3.0% while Shanghai yields hover just above 3.0% and Singapore yields are circa 3.5%.

Melbourne has overtaken Sydney as the best prospect in the Asia-Pacific region for both investment and development (see Figure 1), with Sydney slipping from No. 1 to No. 3 this year. The top four markets for investment in 2019 are:

  • Melbourne (first in investment, first in development) – Melbourne offers a constrained office supply pipeline, a good yield spread over the cost of debt and sovereign bonds, a deep, liquid, core market and good prospects for rental growth
  • Singapore (second in investment, eighth in development) – an improvement in Singapore’s office market has caused the city to take second spot as it rebounds from cyclical lows
  • Sydney (third in investment, third in development) – Sydney offers the same reasons as Melbourne, and is a favourite of global investors due to relatively high returns and as a safe-haven play. Competition for assets has helped sustain pricing, while low vacancies and growing demand for space suggest rents will continue to rise.
  • Tokyo (fourth in investment, fourth in development) – Tokyo’s move to fourth is somewhat surprising after last year’s drop. This reflects cheap finance, attractive leverage, a good spread over other interest rates and a large stock of investment-grade assets.

Figure 1: City investment and development prospects: 2019

Source: ULI/PwC

With abundant capital seeking a home in the Asia-Pacific region, it’s not surprising that Australia continues to be a beneficiary of cross-border money flows. Most of the capital being deployed into Australia is coming from both high net worth families and Asian-based funds domiciled in Singapore and Hong Kong, US real estate equity funds and insurance companies, and the Chinese (see Figure 2).

Despite restrictions on Chinese capital flows, more than $3 billion of Australian assets have been acquired in the first nine months of 2018. This is well down on the $6.7 billion invested in 2016 but is set to pass the $3.4 billion invested in 2017. Recent Chinese investing has largely been driven by corporates and high net worth private investors who have capital reserves outside of China.

Figure 2: Capital flows into Australia: 2016 - 2018

2018 YTD – as at 30 September 2018. Source: Perpetual/Real Capital Analytics

Logistics tops shopping list of sectors

Logistics topped the list in the ULI/PwC survey as the most preferred property sector to invest across the Asia-Pacific region in 2019. For most institutional investors, industrial remains a small component of their investment portfolios, well behind office and retail. This is changing as investors re-rate industrial and some are now seeing it as the retail of the future in their portfolios.

Demand for industrial space is being driven by businesses looking for greater efficiency through the optimisation of their supply chains and warehouse footprints. There is a rise of e-commerce logistic players wanting large, state of the art distribution centres located at major transport hubs. More recently, demand has also spread to last-mile delivery hubs, which provide smaller fulfillment facilities strategically located nearer to, or in, city centres allowing retailers and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) to offer next day, or even inter-day (two hour) delivery.

Investors have responded by driving down industrial yields to enter the sector. The yield spread between industrial and both office and retail property has compressed more over recent years than in previous cycles. According to JLL, prime Sydney industrial yields currently average 5.38%, just 0.63% higher than prime Sydney CBD office yields at 4.75% and 0.56% higher than prime retail yields at 4.82%.

Focus on income in future

2019 is set to be a pivotal year for Australian commercial property. If the ULI/PwC survey is any guide, Australia will remain an attractive destination for foreign capital. Competition for assets will remain high, with the office and industrial sectors being particularly attractive. Yet at this point in the cycle, after eight plus years of yield compression and strong capital growth, income is set to become the main driver of investment returns. Investors will be well served seeking quality assets with long-term leases underpinned by strong tenant covenants. It is these assets that will provide the best protection against any turbulence stemming from disruptions in the broader capital markets.

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Capital & Product Development at Charter Hall, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Charter Hall (and previously, Folkestone), please click here.

 

[1] The ULI/PwC 2019 Emerging Trends in Real Estate Asia Pacific Report is based on the opinions of 350 real estate professionals, including investors, developers, and lenders who were surveyed on the prospects for both property investment and development markets and property finance and capital markets in the Asia-Pacific region.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Seven property depreciation tips for EOFY

David Harrison on the hot spots in property

Four tips on what makes a good commercial property

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.