Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 169

Australia’s mid-caps are fertile territory

The ASX is one of the largest 15 stock markets in the world, with a market capitalisation of $1.5 trillion. What investors might not be aware of, however, is how top-heavy it is. The largest 20 stocks account for 60% of the S&P/ASX300 Index, while financial and mining companies comprise more than two-thirds of the top 20. Banks and miners dominate the local market.

These companies are facing challenging times. Banks are now required to retain more capital on their books, crimping credit growth and putting pressure on returns. At the same time, interest rates are on a downward trend, which has negative impact on their margins. Additionally, they will need to set aside more money in provisions for bad debts, which can only rise from historic lows. All this will cut into their profitability.

Meanwhile, mining companies are being hurt by the decline in commodity prices and a slowdown in the economic growth of China, Australia’s largest trading partner.

Greater investment options

This makes a strong case for investing in the mid- and small-cap companies that comprise the remaining 40% of the ASX and that derives its earnings from more varied sources. This diversity is important, because you don’t want all your stocks exposed to the same growth drivers, nor do you want your returns to be highly correlated.

Once you exclude the top 20 stocks, as the table below demonstrates, the weighting of financial companies falls from 59% to 24%, making it far more balanced and diversified.

Sector breakdown for ASX300 ex-20

Table 1 Sector breakdown for ASX300 ex-20

Table 1 Sector breakdown for ASX300 ex-20

If we consider mid-caps alone, they generally have more developed governance and risk frameworks than small companies, their cash flows are more stable and replicable, and their share prices less volatile.

Still, defining what constitutes a mid-cap company is not an exact science. A good starting point is the S&P/ASX Midcap 50 Index, which comprises all stocks listed on the S&P/ASX 100 excluding the top 50 – in other words, numbers 51 to 100. But this is a narrow definition, and fund managers tend to have their own interpretations. At Aberdeen, we think of mid-caps more broadly as future leaders in their sectors with the right foundations to become the next blue chips: it’s more about potential than position in an index.

This potential is reflected in their returns. Over the past five years, the ASX Mid-Cap 50 Index has consistently outperformed the larger ASX100, 200 and 300 ex-20 indexes.

Performance of large cap vs mid cap

Table 2 Performance of large cap vs mid cap

Reasons mid-caps may outperform

There are a number of reasons for this.

Firstly, mid-caps have more capacity to grow than blue chips, which are constrained by their size in the sectors they already dominate. Average growth in earnings per share for companies in the S&P/ASX300 ex-20 is forecast to be 14.9% over the next 12 months and 9.4% for the following year, versus 7.05% and 8.9% for the S&P/ASX200 Index, according to Bloomberg data.

Secondly, mid-caps have greater flexibility to disrupt the industries they operate in. For example, NIB Holdings, which offers low-cost health insurance products, is competing against market leaders Bupa and Medibank Private. Its comparative nimbleness and lack of bureaucracy allows it to make quick decisions, enabling it to deliver above-average growth consistently. NIB is also diversifying into new markets.

Thirdly, compared to small companies, mid-caps have greater access to capital to drive their expansion. It means they can gain more exposure to larger and/or faster-growing economies, reducing their dependence on domestic earnings. A good example of this is in the health-care sector. Cochlear, Ramsay Healthcare, ResMed and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare are all mid-caps that derive a strong proportion of their earnings outside Australia.

Cochlear makes implants for the hearing impaired. Initially it focused on infants domestically but has since broken into the market for adults and now sells products in more than 100 countries, becoming a global leader in its field.

Similarly, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, which designs and manufactures products to treat sleep-disordered breathing conditions, has innovated constantly to extend its range of equipment. In a world of rising obesity levels, it now sells its systems in more than 120 countries.

Be wary of sector titles

As an active manager, the sector a company operates in is not a factor in our investment decision-making. We want to understand if a business can generate returns in excess of its cost of capital. Having said that, we are mindful of avoiding overlapping exposures in our portfolio and we prefer to invest in industries with strong tailwinds.

While we take a company-by-company approach, generally we see industrials as asset-intensive and carrying significant amounts of debt, so we are underweight. Aurizon and Asciano, for example, are leveraged to trading volumes driven by mining and agriculture, creating cash-flow uncertainty.

At the same time, some sector titles are misleading. Consumer discretionary firms, which provide non-essential goods and services such as entertainment and leisure, make up 13% of the ex-20 index. Because they deal in discretionary goods, demand tends to fluctuate. However, Invocare is a mid-cap in this sector that provides funeral services, and we don’t see them as discretionary at all. In a similar vein, wagering and lotteries operator Tatts Group has produced consistent cash flows across investment cycles.

It is this diversity that makes mid-caps such a fertile ground for active managers to find value. They have a wider dispersion of returns than blue chips and offer greater opportunities to uncover mispricing.

These companies don’t have the inherent bias that comes with large index weightings, or the volatility of the smaller end of the market. There’s a lot to like about them. They’re not too big and not too small, just right, as Goldilocks might say.


Michelle Lopez is a senior investment manager on the Australian equities team at Aberdeen Standard Investments (formerly Aberdeen Asset Management), including sharing responsibility for the Aberdeen Ex-20 Australian Equities Fund. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.