Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 384

Bank scorecard 2020: when will the mojo return?

In early 2020, it seemed that this year the banks would get their mojo back. Rising profits were expected with the 2018 Royal Commission passing into the rear vision mirror along with falling compliance and remediation costs. After Commonwealth Bank reported their first-half 2020 earnings in early February, the bank's share price surged over $90 after delivering 11% profit growth. The only cloud on the horizon was the question as to how the banks would maintain profit margins with interest rates so low.

How wrong we were! In late March, a mere five weeks after reporting solid profit results, Commonwealth Bank's share price had fallen 40% (like all banks) to $54. The financial press was wondering whether the mulit billion dollar provisions each bank had taken for bad debts stemming from Covid-19 shutdowns will be enough.

In this piece, we are going to look at the themes in the approximately 800 pages of financial results released over the past two weeks including Commonwealth Bank's 1st Quarter 2021 Update, awarding gold stars based on performance over the past six months.

Uncertainty falling

In May 2020, the base case for the banks was unemployment between 10-12% and house prices falling by between 15-20% throughout 2020, with further deterioration expected in 2021. This cautious stance saw Westpac taking $1.8 billion and ANZ $1 billion in provisions and most banks declining to pay a dividend. The lack of dividends surprised many investors as Westpac even paid a dividend during its near-death experience in 1992.

November revealed cautious optimism due to the high levels of fiscal stimulus, falling levels of Covid-19 transmission and historically low interest rates. The economy in late 2020 is in better shape than was expected six months ago. Indeed instead of seeing a steep fall in house prices which could have exposed the banks to losses on their mortgage books, in October CoreLogic revealed that house prices across the five main capital cities were up +4% over the past year, with Sydney leading the pack gaining +7%.

Furthermore, in November, the banks showed that the number of stressed customers had been falling steadily. In June, Commonwealth Bank had 210,000 loans on their book deferring payments, this fell to 129,000 in September and again to 52,000 in October as borrowers returned to making full payments.

Strong capital positions

All banks have core Tier 1 capital ratios above the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) 'unquestionably strong' benchmark of 10.5%, despite the billions of dollars of provisions taken and in the case of Westpac, a $1.3 billion-dollar AUSTRAC fine. This allowed Australia's banks to enter 2020 with a greater ability to withstand an external shock than was present in 2006 going into the GFC.

From the below table you can see that the banks have been building capital particularly since 2015 when APRA required that the banks be "unquestionably strong and have capital ratios in the top quartile of internationally active banks".

Furthermore, in the lead up to the Financial Services Royal Commission, the banks have divested their wealth management and insurance businesses to varying degrees. This resulted in the banking sector remaining well capitalised despite taking heavy provisions due to expected loan losses from Covid-19.

In the November management presentations, there was again a tone of self-congratulation from bank executives at their prudence for having such high levels of capital in 2020. In the GFC all banks raised several billion dollars each, whereas in 2020 only NAB raised capital and may not have had to do so if they had been able to divest MLC Wealth in a timelier fashion. Among the banks, Macquarie came out ahead in November with the strongest capital ratio, though in fairness to the trading banks, Macquarie's business model which has a high weighting to annuity funds management income will see lower loan loss provisions that erode capital.

Net interest margins holding

Before the pandemic, the biggest issue facing the banks was maintaining net interest margins as the cash rate moved towards zero. Banks earn a net interest margin [(Interest Received - Interest Paid) / Average Invested Assets] by lending out funds at a higher rate than which they can borrow at. When the prevailing cash rate is 6%, it is much easier for a bank to maintain a profit margin of 2% than when the cash rate is 0.1% and there is nowhere to go in lowering deposit rates further. Also, falling interest rates reduce the benefit that banks get from the billions of dollars held in zero or near-zero interest transaction accounts that can be lent out.

Westpac revealed in September 2020 that it held $196 billion in accounts earning less than 0.25%, an increase of $39 billion over the previous six months that indicates that a portion of the stimulus payments is being saved and not spent. Net interest margins remained stable at between 1.6% and 2.1%, with the banks more heavily exposed to mortgages (CBA and Westpac) traditionally having higher margins. The business banks (NAB and ANZ) generally have lower margins as they face competition from international banks when lending to large corporates. In aggregate net interest margins for the banks only reduced by 0.06% over the past year, a solid outcome given falling interest rates over the past year.

Dividends

While ANZ, Westpac and NAB cut their dividends during the depression, both World Wars, the 1991 recession and the GFC, investors need to look back to the banking crisis of the 1890s to see the last time the major banks declined to pay dividends to shareholders, as they did in May 2020.

The banking crisis of 1893 was arguably more severe than what the banks faced earlier this year. After the collapse of the Melbourne land boom in 1888, a large number of Australian banks were unable to pay depositors, who saw access to their funds locked up for several years. This stressed situation saw the English, Scottish & Australian Bank and London (Chartered) Bank of Australia (precursor banks of ANZ) and National Bank of Australia suspend dividends between four and nine years. In fairness, Westpac (née Bank of New South Wales) could claim to have paid dividends during this period.

In November most of the banks returned to paying dividends from profits, following APRA's guidance of limiting dividends to 50% of statutory profits. However, Westpac's final dividend payout was underwritten by an investment bank issuing new shares, which dilutes shareholders. CBA wins the gold star for the smallest decline in the dividend and by not resorting to financial gymnastics to make the payment.

The road back to pre-COVID-19 levels of profits

While the banks will eventually see profits from banking return to pre-COVID-19 levels, the road back to the same dividends per share that we saw in 2019 will be slow. NAB and Westpac have both conducted significant equity issues over the past 12 months, which have expanded the share count. Commonwealth and ANZ are in a more fortunate position, as they entered 2020 with excess capital, courtesy of the sale of their wealth management and insurance businesses over the past year. As a result, neither of these banks issued shares at depressed prices during 2020.

We expect dividends to increase across the banking sector in 2021, as APRA has indicated that it will relax its stance on limiting bank dividends if the economy continues to improve.

History provides some clues on when the banks will return to their 2019 levels of profitability. After the GFC, the banks took roughly three years until 2011 to regain their pre-GFC level of dividends per share. Less encouraging is the historical example of bank dividends in the 1990s and the 1890s. Westpac took until 2000 to reinstate the same dividend per share that it paid shareholders in 1990.

Atlas believes that the path to restoring dividends is likely to be closer to the post-GFC experience than the 1990s. Today the banks have higher credit quality in their loan books, and no Quintex, Bond Group, ABC Learning nor poorly supervised foreign adventures. Additionally, their customers face interest rates in the low single digits, not the 18-20% mortgage rates seen in the early 1990s and enjoy high levels of fiscal stimulus. Unlike the GFC, in 2020, the banking system is not the cause of the problems we face, and the banks themselves are carrying increased levels of capital to absorb losses.

 

Hugh Dive is Chief Investment Officer of Atlas Funds Management. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. The author would like to recognise Ashley Owen's assistance in looking at historical Australian banking crises.

 

5 Comments
Rob
November 22, 2020

Material omission from the analysis is Cost to Income Ratio. While Westpac is awarded a Gold Star for best Net Interest Margin (2.1%), it has the worst Cost to Income Ratio of 61.6% (NAB 52.4%, CBA 46%, ANZ 53%). Westpac will also only provide details of its 3 year cost plan when it releases its 1st half FY21 result to 31 March 2021.
Also pays to remember that APRA's easing of responsible lending for post pandemic relief, is not permanent in relation to Interest Only switching on home loans. APRA indicated such relief changes should not exceed 12 months, so those loans must come back to P&I repayments. That will also be around the April 2021 when Jobkeeper is likely to end.

Shiraz Nathwani
November 19, 2020

SN

I have no doubt that the Banks divided yield will be maintained and with imputed credit Retirees and longtime shareholders will benefit

George
November 19, 2020

If there is one thing most analysts got wrong in 2020, it is the expectation of falling property prices and defaulting loans. Where is the second wave?

Hugh
November 20, 2020

That is correct George the expectations of 15-20% falls in house prices made in March/April don't look very robust right now with approx 5-7% gains in 2020. CBA's CEO in August gave what we thought was a good explanation on the earnings call. He said that "unlike other cycles where the cash rate is now, it means that interest-only is a very viable option for many customers. A typical loan size is approximately $350,000. So a repayment amount is like -- the interest-only is approximately $200 per week" . Where a customer can move from principal and interest to interest only and pay less what they would if they had to rent, there is minimal compulsion to default on a loan, especially in an environment where the banks are looking to rehabilitate their image by being accommodating to borrowers under stress. A very different situation to 1991 where a borrower who has lost their job would have faced interest rates of 18% and no JobSeeker/JobKeeper supplement

Paul
November 26, 2020

Which investors were surprised that banks did not pay a dividend?

APRA gave guidance to banks not to pay dividends as they were capitally constrained.

I find this comment very surprising.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Bank reporting season scorecard May 2021

Bank reporting season scorecard May 2020

Bank reporting season scorecard for FY19

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.