Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Bond investing as rates rise

Last week, Jim McKay argued there is limited appeal of investing in developed country bonds, where real interest rates (nominal interest rates less inflation) currently provide little, or even a negative, return to bond holders.

Warren Bird, formerly Co-Head of Global Fixed Interest and Credit at Colonial First State Global Asset Management, responds:

Of course you could accept the fact that rising yields produce higher returns and just relax. I've been writing and speaking for 20 years about the misplaced fear of rising bond yields. It's a simple message: fixed interest investing is all about the interest you earn. As yields go up, you get to reinvest income or maturing bonds at those higher yields, which ratchets up your interest earnings. Bond price volatility is just that - volatility.

The best example is the return from Australian bonds to investors who entered the market just before the sell off in 1994. They bought a portfolio yielding about 6%. Over the next 3 years they actually earned 8% pa. How, when 1994 was so terrible? Well, although they earned about -5% in 1994, the reinvestment income from putting maturing money back to work at 9, 10 and 11% lifted the returns during 1995 and 1996. Yields were back around 6% after 3 years, so there's no capital gain involved - just higher reinvestment earnings. If the bear market of 1994 hadn't happened, then returns over the 3 years to 1997 would have been lower, at around 6% pa.

There's a very good reason why fund managers advise you to look at investing in bonds over a 3-5 year time frame. Because that's when the short term volatility of bond prices mostly washes out and you earn the income you expect to when you make your investment.

Sure, if you knew that a rise in yields was coming you would be sensible to shorten up your duration, avoid the mark to market loss, and then put your money back into those higher yields. But can we be so sure that yields must rise from now? They've already backed up by well over 1% during 2013 and frankly a ten year government guaranteed income stream of 4.25% pa, that will rise if yields go up, doesn't actually look too bad if you have even the slightest concerns about the health of the world economy.

Therefore, I believe that a perfectly valid strategy in a rising yield environment is simply to reinvest your cash flows and enjoy the higher returns you end up earning.

  •   3 December 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Your bond questions answered

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.