Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 41

Companies that fear innovation risk stagnating

Some years ago, the Harvard Business Review ran a must-read article called, 'Countering the Biggest Risk of All'. It talks about seven major classes of strategic risk, that is, industry, technology, brand, competitor, customer, project and stagnation. The concept of stagnation risk is not often discussed.

The article defines market stagnation as ‘the inability to find new sources of growth’. It says that the best countermeasure for dealing with this class of risk is ‘demand innovation’, which involves ‘redefining your market by looking at it through the lens of the customers’ economics and expanding the value you offer your customers …'

In my experience, I’ve seen two types of stagnation risk.

Stagnation risk I: fear of radical change

Take the scenario of a strategic discussion where a course of action that involves radical change is being considered. The actuaries and other risk professionals will thoroughly analyse the risks of proceeding with a course of action. However the risks of not proceeding are not often given as much emphasis. That is: what happens if we don’t do this? What if we delay and don’t do it now? And what do we lose by not acting?

As a result bold decisions may be deemed too risky, or pared back and dumbed down, without proper consideration of the costs of inaction. This is the stagnation associated with lack of innovation. It is particularly prevalent in large organisations with dominant market shares, which feel safe in their current operating mode. A perception can grow that ‘everything is OK and we have a lot to lose by implementing a radical change’. However, when an organisation does not innovate, competitors step in and fill the gaps.

In product development, there is always the dilemma of whether and when to introduce a radically new product, especially if it is a lower cost, lower margin product that will cannibalise the organisation’s existing (and profitable) book of business. Then once it is launched there is the moral dilemma of how the new product is marketed to the existing customers. Does the organisation proactively tell them that they would be better off switching to the new, lower cost product? Or leave them paying more and hope they don’t notice?

If the organisation looks through the customer lens, there is an argument that it should definitely market the new product to the existing book, recognising that if it doesn’t, then eventually a competitor will. However in superannuation, with a disengaged customer base, it’s not always an easy call to cannibalise profits, as organisations know that a large part of the customer base in the old product may stay there for many years.

If customers are left consuming outdated products for years without being offered the more competitive alternatives, once they do find out (and they will, eventually), they are likely to become disgruntled and lost to a competitor. There is also the risk of reputational damage to the organisation from a large portion of existing customers becoming net detractors, possibly with a spill-over into consumer advocacy and negative publicity. This risk should be fully costed and be part of the decision-making process.

Stagnation risk II: taking your eye off the ball

Take the example of an organisation that is busy implementing responses to legislative changes, as pretty much every super fund in Australia has been for the last five or more years. Everyone has their heads down and bottoms up, and the whole organisation puts in long hours on tight deadline projects. Everyone takes the view that ‘we’re all exhausted but we really feel like we’re achieving something’. This is a classic set-up with all the elements necessary for deep stagnation.

In such busy workplaces, the widely-held view is:

We are simply running to stand still. We’re bogged down and spinning the wheels. All that action gives us the illusion of progress but we’re stagnating. We can’t remember the last time we innovated because all the leadership, strategists and product development teams are completely consumed in a reactive, fire-fighting mode facing new legislation and changes to our processes. We don’t have the time and space to think.

It’s difficult for busy people to innovate. Creativity requires being out of the madness of day to day activities. As someone who has been outside the super industry for the last few years looking in, the lack of innovation is clear, especially in the post-retirement space. That's easy for me to say, because I didn’t have to implement the FOFA and Stronger Super changes!

How many organisations take their best people out of the busy yet distracted day-to-day workforce and give them space to be creative – for example, an innovation ‘skunk works’? We’re starting to see Chief Innovation Officers appointed now, so perhaps this is coming.

So can we change? Yes, we can. But to do so, we need to take the time and space to look for a vision of the future, where we can drive growth in our business by stimulating demand. We’ll need to look at issues through our customers’ eyes and expand the value proposition we offer them. This will involve radical change. We need to weigh the downside of not acting along with the risks and rewards of acting. And believe that if we build it, they will come (misquoted, with apologies, from 1989 movie Field of Dreams).

 

Melinda Howes is an actuary, a financial services executive and a non-executive director.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Australian house price speculators: What were you thinking?

Australian housing’s 50-year boom was driven by falling rates and rising borrowing power — not rent or yield. With those drivers exhausted, future returns must reconcile with economic fundamentals. Are we ready?

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 627 with weekend update

This week, I got the news that my mother has dementia. It came shortly after my father received the same diagnosis. This is a meditation on getting old and my regrets in not getting my parents’ affairs in order sooner.

  • 4 September 2025

Latest Updates

Shares

Why the ASX may be more expensive than the US market

On every valuation metric, the US appears significantly more expensive than Australia. However, American companies are also much more profitable than ours, which means the ASX may be more overvalued than most think.

Economy

No one holds the government to account on spending

Government spending is out of control and there's little sign that Labor will curb it. We need enforceable rules on spending and an empowered budget office to ensure governments act responsibly with taxpayers money.

Retirement

Why a traditional retirement may be pushed back 25 years

The idea of stopping work during your sixties is a man-made concept from another age. In a world where many jobs are knowledge based and can be done from anywhere, it may no longer make much sense at all.

Shares

The quiet winners of AI competition

The tech giants are in a money-throwing contest to secure AI supremacy and may fall short of high investor expectations. The companies supplying this arms race could offer a more attractive way to play AI adoption.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Infrastructure

Renewable energy investment: gloom or boom?

ESG investing has fallen out of favour with many investors, and Trump's anti-green policies haven't helped. Yet, renewables investment is still surging, which could prove a boon for infrastructure companies.

Investing

The enduring wisdom of John Bogle in five quotes

From buying the whole market to controlling emotions, John Bogle’s legendary advice reminds investors that patience, discipline, and low costs are the keys to investment success in any market environment.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.