Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 41

Companies that fear innovation risk stagnating

Some years ago, the Harvard Business Review ran a must-read article called, 'Countering the Biggest Risk of All'. It talks about seven major classes of strategic risk, that is, industry, technology, brand, competitor, customer, project and stagnation. The concept of stagnation risk is not often discussed.

The article defines market stagnation as ‘the inability to find new sources of growth’. It says that the best countermeasure for dealing with this class of risk is ‘demand innovation’, which involves ‘redefining your market by looking at it through the lens of the customers’ economics and expanding the value you offer your customers …'

In my experience, I’ve seen two types of stagnation risk.

Stagnation risk I: fear of radical change

Take the scenario of a strategic discussion where a course of action that involves radical change is being considered. The actuaries and other risk professionals will thoroughly analyse the risks of proceeding with a course of action. However the risks of not proceeding are not often given as much emphasis. That is: what happens if we don’t do this? What if we delay and don’t do it now? And what do we lose by not acting?

As a result bold decisions may be deemed too risky, or pared back and dumbed down, without proper consideration of the costs of inaction. This is the stagnation associated with lack of innovation. It is particularly prevalent in large organisations with dominant market shares, which feel safe in their current operating mode. A perception can grow that ‘everything is OK and we have a lot to lose by implementing a radical change’. However, when an organisation does not innovate, competitors step in and fill the gaps.

In product development, there is always the dilemma of whether and when to introduce a radically new product, especially if it is a lower cost, lower margin product that will cannibalise the organisation’s existing (and profitable) book of business. Then once it is launched there is the moral dilemma of how the new product is marketed to the existing customers. Does the organisation proactively tell them that they would be better off switching to the new, lower cost product? Or leave them paying more and hope they don’t notice?

If the organisation looks through the customer lens, there is an argument that it should definitely market the new product to the existing book, recognising that if it doesn’t, then eventually a competitor will. However in superannuation, with a disengaged customer base, it’s not always an easy call to cannibalise profits, as organisations know that a large part of the customer base in the old product may stay there for many years.

If customers are left consuming outdated products for years without being offered the more competitive alternatives, once they do find out (and they will, eventually), they are likely to become disgruntled and lost to a competitor. There is also the risk of reputational damage to the organisation from a large portion of existing customers becoming net detractors, possibly with a spill-over into consumer advocacy and negative publicity. This risk should be fully costed and be part of the decision-making process.

Stagnation risk II: taking your eye off the ball

Take the example of an organisation that is busy implementing responses to legislative changes, as pretty much every super fund in Australia has been for the last five or more years. Everyone has their heads down and bottoms up, and the whole organisation puts in long hours on tight deadline projects. Everyone takes the view that ‘we’re all exhausted but we really feel like we’re achieving something’. This is a classic set-up with all the elements necessary for deep stagnation.

In such busy workplaces, the widely-held view is:

We are simply running to stand still. We’re bogged down and spinning the wheels. All that action gives us the illusion of progress but we’re stagnating. We can’t remember the last time we innovated because all the leadership, strategists and product development teams are completely consumed in a reactive, fire-fighting mode facing new legislation and changes to our processes. We don’t have the time and space to think.

It’s difficult for busy people to innovate. Creativity requires being out of the madness of day to day activities. As someone who has been outside the super industry for the last few years looking in, the lack of innovation is clear, especially in the post-retirement space. That's easy for me to say, because I didn’t have to implement the FOFA and Stronger Super changes!

How many organisations take their best people out of the busy yet distracted day-to-day workforce and give them space to be creative – for example, an innovation ‘skunk works’? We’re starting to see Chief Innovation Officers appointed now, so perhaps this is coming.

So can we change? Yes, we can. But to do so, we need to take the time and space to look for a vision of the future, where we can drive growth in our business by stimulating demand. We’ll need to look at issues through our customers’ eyes and expand the value proposition we offer them. This will involve radical change. We need to weigh the downside of not acting along with the risks and rewards of acting. And believe that if we build it, they will come (misquoted, with apologies, from 1989 movie Field of Dreams).

 

Melinda Howes is an actuary, a financial services executive and a non-executive director.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Chinese steel - building a Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes

China's steel production, equivalent to building one Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes, has driven Australia's economic growth. With China's slowdown, what does this mean for Australia's economy and investments?

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Super crosses the retirement Rubicon

Australia's superannuation system faces a 'Rubicon' moment, a turning point where the focus is shifting from accumulation phase to retirement readiness, but unfortunately, many funds are not rising to the challenge.

Economy

Should Australia follow Trump's new brand of capitalism?

A new brand of capitalism may be emerging - one where governments take equity in private companies. Is it state overreach, or a smarter way to fund public goods without raising taxes?

Gold

Why gold may keep rising - and what could stop it

Central banks are buying, Asia’s investing, and gold’s going digital. The World Gold Council CEO reveals the structural shifts transforming the gold market - and the one economic wildcard that could change everything. 

Investment strategies

Fact, fiction and fission: The future of nuclear energy

Nuclear power is back in the spotlight, including in Australia. For investors exploring the sector, here are four key factors to consider in this evolving energy landscape. 

Taxation

The myth of Australia’s high corporate tax rate

Australia’s corporate tax rate is widely seen as a growth-killing burden. But for most local investors, it’s a mirage - erased by dividend imputation. So why is it still shaping national policy? 

Taxation

Should we change the company tax rate?

The headline 30% corporate tax rate masks a complex system of dividend imputation and franking credits that ensures Australian shareholders are taxed only once, challenging traditional measures of tax competitiveness. 

Investing

Noise cancelling for investors

A lot of the information at an investor's fingertips today has little long-term value. The modern investing greats are not united by access to faster information, but by their ability to filter out what doesn’t matter.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.