Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 261

The importance of corporate culture in investing

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing has been in a structural growth phase for some years now. A report by the Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA) notes that 81% of the largest super funds have now embedded a formal commitment to responsible investment, up from 70% in 2016. Additional research conducted by the RIAA found that funds which are implementing core responsible investment strategies are outperforming equivalent Australian and international share funds and multi-sector growth funds over most time horizons.

The corporate culture advantage

Core to ESG is governance. Corporate governance upheld by a robust company culture can help organisations thrive and can become a powerful differentiator. We recently wrote about how focussed on culture the CEOs at Berkshire Hathaway are. The more we look, the more we see companies taking market share and outpacing their competition by placing focus here. A great culture may contribute to outperformance or a generation of long-term shareholder value via attracting and retaining the best staff or improving brand and reputation, whereas poor culture can be costly to a business.

Corporate culture is clearly taken seriously by the world’s leading businesses. A 2018 study published in the Harvard Business Review ‘The Leader’s Guide to Corporate Culture’ references several high-profile CEOs and their approach to culture, two of our favourite quotes being:

“Most of the greatest companies in the world also have great purposes … Having a deeper, more transcendent purpose is highly energizing for all of the various interdependent stakeholders.” —John Mackey, founder and CEO, Whole Foods

“It is incredibly important to be open and accessible and treat people fairly and look them in the eye and tell them what is on your mind.”—Bob Iger, CEO Disney

In a recent interview, one of the most successful traders in the world, Paul Tudor-Jones, made the following comments on company culture:

“If you have a motivated workforce that you pay and treat well, you produce a high quality and low-cost product that has some benefit, and you treat your customers throughout with respect, this is a winning formula and these companies are outperforming those that don’t. It’s a win-win, go look at the companies that are doing it, they’re outperforming everyone else.

The drivers of socially responsible investing

Mr Jones has gone a step further in redefining the definition of socially responsible investing, believing that capitalism may need modernising. He polled the American public on their definition of ‘just’ behaviour. The poll took 200 socially responsible metrics and combined them into 39, and then aggregated those into seven drivers. Those seven drivers in order of importance are:

  1. How do you pay and treat workers?
  2. How do you treat your customers, do you respect them individually, their privacy?
  3. Do you make high quality, low cost, socially beneficial products?
  4. Environment sustainability
  5. Community awareness
  6. Domestic job creation
  7. Do you serve your shareholders?

Using these seven socially responsible metrics, Mr Jones then created an index based on the 1,000 largest US companies and applied these criteria. Assessing the companies which performed best or in the top half of each sector, he found the following from this group:

  • These companies on average created 20% more jobs
  • These companies pay over 70% less in fines
  • They donate 2.4 times more to the local community and charities
  • And arguably the most important point for investors, these companies had on average 7% higher return on equity (ROE) than the companies in the bottom half of each sector.

Mr Jones presents a strong case for including these questions as part of the investment process or when including a new position in a portfolio.

We agree, and given the significant potential benefit to long-term shareholder returns, these considerations should be of growing importance for all investors.

 

Ben Rundle is a Portfolio Manager at NAOS Asset Management. This material is provided for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice. It does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor. Before making an investment decision, investors should consider obtaining professional investment advice that is tailored to their specific circumstances.

NAOS is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from NAOS, please click here.

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Arms stocks don’t belong in our ESG funds

Beyond the acronym, navigating important ESG choices

Elevating responsible investing to solve real world challenges

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.