Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 135

Dealing with time zones when pricing global ETFs

Many investors wonder how Exchange Traded Products (ETPs), including Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), that track international markets are priced on the ASX when the underlying offshore markets are closed. Australians often find out how the US market has performed overnight by listening to the news whilst heading to work or reading the paper with their morning coffee. This can lead to some confusion, as although a news report might say the S&P 500 or the NASDAQ has moved by a certain percentage overnight, this price change is often not exactly reflected in the opening price of funds (which aim to track these indices) when the ASX starts trading from 10.00am.

A typical question we receive is “The S&P 500/NASDAQ etc. did +% or -% last night – why isn’t my fund doing the same?”

Futures markets continue to trade when stock exchanges are closed

There is a ready answer. These differences are explained by the differing time zones in which the international exchanges around the globe operate, and the fact that futures markets operate continuously around the clock even when certain exchanges are closed.

We’ll use the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (ASX Ticker: NDQ) as an example (and ignore the effect of currency fluctuations).

When tracking its benchmark index (the NASDAQ 100 Index), NDQ has performed well since inception. The chart below shows NDQ vs. the NASDAQ 100 Index. Although you can’t see it, there are actually two lines being plotted here (the two lines are virtually indistinguishable from each other).

Period 26 May 2015 to 30 September 2015.
Source: BetaShares. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

Time zones and fund pricing

The charts below show the respective returns of the NASDAQ 100 Index and the Nasdaq 100 Futures Market on 1 September 2015 (NYC Time) and examine how these reconcile with the pricing of the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF when it opened on the ASX on 2 September 2015.

At the close of the US ‘cash’ equities markets at 4pm (New York time) 1 September 2015, the value of NASDAQ 100 Index – based on shares trading on this market – was down 3.08% on its closing value of the previous day. This is the figure typically quoted in news reports in Australia over morning coffee. These reports will say, for example, “the Nasdaq closed down 3.08% today.”

Yet it should be noted that the ASX market won’t open until 10am Sydney time, or around 4 hours (depending on daylight savings) after US equity markets have closed. Will the 3% decline in the market still be relevant? After all, market sensitive news is still being released. Indeed, it is often the case that companies release important new information after the US cash equities markets (like the New York Stock Exchange) have closed for the day.

New information is in the price when ASX opens

This new information is reflected in the NASDAQ 100 Futures Market, which continues to trade even after the US equity market has closed. The chart below shows the price of the NASDAQ 100 Futures. As might be evident, the futures price tracks the actual Nasdaq 100 cash index quite closely when US equity markets are open.

The gap between the second red line and the green line, however, shows the performance of the NASDAQ 100 Futures prices between the time of the US equity market’s close and the ASX open. As seen, on this day, the NASDAQ 100 Futures price rallied by 1.16% in this period, perhaps reflecting the release of some positive market news.

Here’s the important point: the market makers involved in the Australian-listed NDQ ETF will set opening prices for the Fund with reference to the NASDAQ-100 Futures market as at ASX’s market open. It is the best indicator of fair value while the US equity market is closed.

The opening bid-offer prices of NDQ ETF will reflect the higher NASDAQ-100 Futures price at the time the ASX opens. What’s more, the closing bid-offer prices of NDQ ETF will reflect the price of Nasdaq-100 Futures at around the ASX close at 4pm Sydney time.

It follows that the overnight percentage changes will reflect the percentage changes in the NASDAQ-100 Futures price at the time of the ASX close the day before and at ASX open the following morning. Due to the timing gaps with the opening and closing times of the NYC, these movements will often not mirror those of the actual NASDAQ physical index.

To be precise, the actual opening and closing recorded prices of NDQ ETF will depend on the time at which the first and last trades take place on that day, which should be close to 10am and 4pm respectively though not necessarily exactly at those times. That means that if, for example, the last trade of NDQ ETF takes place at 3.45pm then the closing prices will be reflective of the Nasdaq-100 Futures price at 3.45pm.

 

Matthew Leung is a Business Development Associate at BetaShares Capital, a leading provider of Exchange-Traded Products. 

 

  •   19 November 2015
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Will ETF liquidity be there when I need it?

The challenges of building a lazy portfolio

ASA’s view on the banning of LIC commissions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.