Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 135

Dealing with time zones when pricing global ETFs

Many investors wonder how Exchange Traded Products (ETPs), including Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), that track international markets are priced on the ASX when the underlying offshore markets are closed. Australians often find out how the US market has performed overnight by listening to the news whilst heading to work or reading the paper with their morning coffee. This can lead to some confusion, as although a news report might say the S&P 500 or the NASDAQ has moved by a certain percentage overnight, this price change is often not exactly reflected in the opening price of funds (which aim to track these indices) when the ASX starts trading from 10.00am.

A typical question we receive is “The S&P 500/NASDAQ etc. did +% or -% last night – why isn’t my fund doing the same?”

Futures markets continue to trade when stock exchanges are closed

There is a ready answer. These differences are explained by the differing time zones in which the international exchanges around the globe operate, and the fact that futures markets operate continuously around the clock even when certain exchanges are closed.

We’ll use the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (ASX Ticker: NDQ) as an example (and ignore the effect of currency fluctuations).

When tracking its benchmark index (the NASDAQ 100 Index), NDQ has performed well since inception. The chart below shows NDQ vs. the NASDAQ 100 Index. Although you can’t see it, there are actually two lines being plotted here (the two lines are virtually indistinguishable from each other).

Period 26 May 2015 to 30 September 2015.
Source: BetaShares. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

Time zones and fund pricing

The charts below show the respective returns of the NASDAQ 100 Index and the Nasdaq 100 Futures Market on 1 September 2015 (NYC Time) and examine how these reconcile with the pricing of the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF when it opened on the ASX on 2 September 2015.

At the close of the US ‘cash’ equities markets at 4pm (New York time) 1 September 2015, the value of NASDAQ 100 Index – based on shares trading on this market – was down 3.08% on its closing value of the previous day. This is the figure typically quoted in news reports in Australia over morning coffee. These reports will say, for example, “the Nasdaq closed down 3.08% today.”

Yet it should be noted that the ASX market won’t open until 10am Sydney time, or around 4 hours (depending on daylight savings) after US equity markets have closed. Will the 3% decline in the market still be relevant? After all, market sensitive news is still being released. Indeed, it is often the case that companies release important new information after the US cash equities markets (like the New York Stock Exchange) have closed for the day.

New information is in the price when ASX opens

This new information is reflected in the NASDAQ 100 Futures Market, which continues to trade even after the US equity market has closed. The chart below shows the price of the NASDAQ 100 Futures. As might be evident, the futures price tracks the actual Nasdaq 100 cash index quite closely when US equity markets are open.

The gap between the second red line and the green line, however, shows the performance of the NASDAQ 100 Futures prices between the time of the US equity market’s close and the ASX open. As seen, on this day, the NASDAQ 100 Futures price rallied by 1.16% in this period, perhaps reflecting the release of some positive market news.

Here’s the important point: the market makers involved in the Australian-listed NDQ ETF will set opening prices for the Fund with reference to the NASDAQ-100 Futures market as at ASX’s market open. It is the best indicator of fair value while the US equity market is closed.

The opening bid-offer prices of NDQ ETF will reflect the higher NASDAQ-100 Futures price at the time the ASX opens. What’s more, the closing bid-offer prices of NDQ ETF will reflect the price of Nasdaq-100 Futures at around the ASX close at 4pm Sydney time.

It follows that the overnight percentage changes will reflect the percentage changes in the NASDAQ-100 Futures price at the time of the ASX close the day before and at ASX open the following morning. Due to the timing gaps with the opening and closing times of the NYC, these movements will often not mirror those of the actual NASDAQ physical index.

To be precise, the actual opening and closing recorded prices of NDQ ETF will depend on the time at which the first and last trades take place on that day, which should be close to 10am and 4pm respectively though not necessarily exactly at those times. That means that if, for example, the last trade of NDQ ETF takes place at 3.45pm then the closing prices will be reflective of the Nasdaq-100 Futures price at 3.45pm.

 

Matthew Leung is a Business Development Associate at BetaShares Capital, a leading provider of Exchange-Traded Products. 

 

  •   19 November 2015
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Will ETF liquidity be there when I need it?

The challenges of building a lazy portfolio

ASA’s view on the banning of LIC commissions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.