Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 241

Ensure death benefit nominations are upheld

When a superannuation fund member dies, the fund trustee pays the death benefit to their eligible dependants or to their estate. This is one area of super where there have not been incessant changes to the rules in recent years. However, super fund members are often not familiar with the requirements on death benefit nominations. The main issues relate to the types of nominees and the classes of nominations.

Types of nominees

Superannuation law provides that a super death benefit can only be paid to a legal personal representative or a dependant.

The legal personal representative (LPR) is the person responsible for ensuring that various tasks are carried out on behalf of the estate for a person who has died. A person may be appointed to the role by being named as the executor in the will or where there is no will, by being appointed as administrator of the estate by the Supreme Court.

A dependant includes a spouse, a child, a financial dependant or any person with whom the deceased had an interdependency relationship.

A spouse is the surviving partner of a legally married couple or a de-facto couple (either same sex or opposite sex).

A child may be:

  • an adopted child, a stepchild, or an ex-nuptial child of a person
  • a child of a person’s spouse, or
  • a child within the meaning of the Family Law Act (mainly covering artificial conception).

Whilst a stepchild is included in the definition of a child, note that the dissolution of the relationship between the parent and the stepparent severs the stepchild relationship. That is, if the natural parent dies or separates from the stepparent, the stepchild/parent relationship ceases at that time. The child may however still qualify as a financial dependant or under an interdependency relationship.

Two people have an interdependency relationship if:

  • they have a close personal relationship, and
  • they live together, and
  • one or each of them provides the other with financial support, and
  • one or each of them provides the other with domestic support and personal care.

Two people may still have an interdependency relationship if they have a close personal relationship but do not live together due to disability or temporary absence (for example if one person lives overseas for work). Otherwise, it is important to note that all four of the interdependency conditions must be met.

It is up to the trustee’s discretion to determine the recipient of a member’s death benefit. The two exceptions to this rule are member-directed nominations for small funds and binding death benefit nominations.

Classes of nominations

The nomination options include:

1. Member-directed nominations

SMSFs and small APRA funds (SAFs) are exempt from the provisions of superannuation law which prohibit a person who is not a trustee from exercising a discretion as to who will receive the death benefit.

Members of SMSFs and SAFs are able to incorporate certainty in the nomination of beneficiaries using a clause in the fund’s trust deed. Such a clause would typically state that:

  • if a member nominates a valid dependant, the benefit shall be paid to them.
  • if there is no nomination, or the nomination is invalid, the benefit shall be paid to the LPR.

2. Reversionary pensions

Upon the death of the pensioner, payments from reversionary pensions revert to the reversionary beneficiary. If the reversionary beneficiary pre-deceases the pensioner, the benefit would ordinarily pass to the pensioner’s estate. From 1 July 2017, the maximum amount that can revert to a spouse is generally $1.6 million.

These types of nominations generally provide certainty and peace of mind for clients. In most situations, the surviving spouse simply needs to notify the trustee of the death and a new bank account number.

Since 1 July 2007, death benefits cannot be paid in the form of an income stream to children over the age of 25 unless they are disabled. Accordingly, adult children cannot generally be nominated as reversionary beneficiaries.

3. Binding nominations

A binding nomination can provide certainty as to who receives the member’s death benefit based on a nomination of the person(s) to whom the death benefit will be paid. This nomination is an exception to the rule that no one other than the trustee can exercise a discretion.

Before this exception is granted, the following conditions must be met:

  • The trustee must give the member sufficient information to understand the nature of a binding nomination.
  • The nomination must nominate a superannuation law dependant.
  • The nomination must be in writing.
  • The nomination must be signed and dated in the presence of two witnesses.
  • The witnesses must be over 18 and not a nominated dependant or LPR.
  • The nomination must be clear and unambiguous.
  • If the nomination is not clear, the trustee must seek clarification as soon as practicable.
  • The nomination expires after three years.
  • The nomination may be amended or revoked.

The fund’s trust deed must also permit binding nominations. If a trustee accepts a nomination that meets the criteria stipulated in superannuation law, the trustee is bound to make the payment in accordance with the nomination.

However, a binding nomination can never bind a trustee to make a payment to a person who does not meet the definition of a dependant.

4. Nominated beneficiaries

A beneficiary nomination is an expression of wishes which is not binding on trustees. As with all other types of nominations, a nominated beneficiary must meet the superannuation law definition of a dependant.

With the exception of SMSFs and SAFs, once discretion has been exercised as to the intended recipients of the death benefit, the trustee is required to undertake a claim staking process to identify potential beneficiaries and inform them of their intentions as to how the benefit will be distributed.

Potential beneficiaries include anyone who meets the superannuation law definition of dependant. The potential beneficiaries have 28 days to object to the trustee’s intention. If a potential beneficiary objects to the intended distribution, the trustee must obtain further information about the potential beneficiaries’ level of dependency, reassess their decision, and re-commence the claim staking process.

If potential beneficiaries are dissatisfied with the trustee’s decision, they may lodge a formal complaint through the fund’s internal complaints process. If they remain dissatisfied, they can refer their complaint to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal.

Obtaining certainty

Issues continue to arise when people are nominated who do not meet the definition of a dependant, such as where a member wishes to nominate their parents to be the recipients of their death benefit, but they are not living with their parents nor are they providing them with financial support. In this instance, the member would need to prepare a will and direct the superannuation to the LPR. The trustee would not be able to make the payment to the member’s parents.

In retail, corporate, or industry super funds, certainty is obtained by completing binding nominations or reversionary pensions. The most certain outcome for SMSFs and SAFs is to include the requirement to pay a nominated dependant in the fund’s trust deed.

Members should review their death benefit nominations to ensure no issues arise later.

 

Julie Steed is Senior Technical Services Manager at Australian Executor Trustees. This article is in the nature of general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

RELATED ARTICLES

Limits to a will’s power over an SMSF

SMSFs can lend to some relatives

Watch SMSF borrowing rules for separate assets

4 Comments
Sally Ann Lineburg
September 18, 2018

Hi Julie,

Thank you for a clear & consise article regarding an area for which, seemingly even the Legal representatives are confused. I am awaiting a hearing before the ombudsman in Queensland where a super funds's Trustees are insisting on paying my son's deceased father's estate to his second wife.

They had been separated for over 2 years, financial settlement had been agreed and finalised by the courts and divorce procedings had commenced, however were not finalised prior to his passing.

She does not meet with any of the listed criteria within the binding nomination conditions of validity thus I am at a loss as to why or how they have made the decision to pay 100% of the death benefit and the super fund balance to her?

I am wondering if this is a case that you have come accross before?

Warm regards,

Sally-ann

Neil
February 25, 2018

Thanks Julie.

Julie
February 23, 2018

Hi Neil,
The description you provide seems very clear that the nomination is binding on the trustee provided that their active consent is given to the nomination.

This can be achieved by the fund having a specific clause in the trust deed to facilitate this type of nomination, together with a process for actively consenting to the nomination.
Regards
Julie

Neil
February 23, 2018

Hi Julie, thanks for your succinct article.

I have a super account with a large public offer fund. It offers a non-lapsing nomination (requiring two witnesses as you describe), which I understood to be binding. If so, it can obviously last more than three years.

On examination though, I notice the word "Binding" is not present on the form.
However, it does include the following paragraphs:

"We are required to follow your nomination if, prior to your death,
you complete and we receive your valid non-lapsing death benefit
nomination, and we consent to that nomination.
The nomination remains valid until you revoke or make a new
nomination. This can provide you with greater certainty on who
will receive your death benefit when you die."

Are you able to say if this is technically (and legally) a non-lapsing binding nomination?


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you caught in the ‘retirement trap’?

Our retirement savings system is supposed to encourage financial independence but there is a ‘Retirement Trap’ due to the reduction of age pension entitlements as assets and income rise.

The power of letting winners run

Handling extreme winners is a complex task. Conventional wisdom such as “you never go broke taking a profit” often leaves a lot of money on the table as strong growth stocks continue to run.

Tony Togher on why cash isn’t just cash

An active manager of cash and fixed interest funds can achieve higher returns than the cash rate through a selection of other securities while managing both liquidity and income for clients.

NAB hybrid: one says buy, one says sell, you decide

Differences of opinion make a market, and hybrid specialists disagree on the likelihood that NAB will call one of its hybrids early. It makes a major difference to the expected return on NABHA.

Watch your SMSF’s annual return this year

The best way to preserve your SMSF’s favoured status is to make sure the fund’s annual return reaches the ATO on time. There are new rules this year that every SMSF trustee should know.

Worshipping at the altar of alternative assets

Investors worried about an overvalued sharemarket and low interest rates on term deposits and bonds are focusing on alternatives. What are they and how are they used by leading asset allocators?

Latest Updates

Interviews

Kunal Kapoor on different paths to investor success

The Morningstar CEO on democratising investing, why saving in your youth is crucial, and why most investors care more about paying off their debts than comparing their results against benchmarks.

Investment strategies

Do sin stocks really give your portfolio the edge?

Should sin stocks, those companies who engage in activities that are considered unethical or immoral, be excluded from a portfolio, or would this compromise potential performance?

Economy

What is the likely effect of COVID-19 on the Australian economy?

Our close links to China mean the impact of the virus could tip the local economy into recession and certain sectors such as resources, education and travel will be harder hit than others.

Insurance

Poor pricing of life insurance products and the impact on Australians

The use of discounted pricing by insurers to attract new business is unsustainable and leaves existing policyholders on higher premiums for what is essentially the same product.

Retirement

Spotting signs of trouble in a retirement portfolio

Do you risk paying a lot of tax in accumulation phase? Or, if you're in retirement phase, do you face the risk of outliving your asset pool? Two key things to consider in the low-rate world of today.

Sponsors

Alliances