Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 175

Decarbonisation, energy storage and efficiency

This paper discusses current themes in the electric utility sector, specifically in decarbonisation, energy efficiency and energy storage.

Are renewables cost competitive?

The cost of onshore wind energy declined by 65% between 1988 and 2014 (according to the International Renewable Energy Agency) due to economies of scale, technology innovations and operational and maintenance improvements. Onshore wind can compete with fossil fuels, with the levelised cost of onshore wind estimated to be below €0.05 per kilowatt hour (kWh) versus coal at €0.049 / kWh and gas at €0.041 / kWh.

The expectation is that wind will continue to get cheaper as better siting, longer blades and taller towers drive productivity gains. In the UK, load factors have risen from around 34% in 2003 to around 45% in 2014. This is set to increase due to the high levels of R&D now being spent in an industry that has gone from a standing start to having key global turbine manufacturers such as Siemens, General Electric and Vestas.

Are renewables growing as part of the energy mix?

Renewable capacity additions represented about half the world’s total capacity additions in 2014, supported by:

(1) country and state decarbonisation targets eg US renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and EU carbon targets

(2) carbon taxes and UK carbon floor

(3) tax incentives eg US production tax credits and investment tax credits

(4) the social implications of burning fossil fuels such as smog, and

(5) reduced fossil fuel subsidies in countries including India, Indonesia and Spain.

We expect renewables will represent a growing portion of new generation capacity in the future, due to the above points and a lack of economically viable clean coal plants.

Is energy storage a game changer?

In short, yes. Effective energy storage can help back up intermittent renewable power and be used to power electric vehicles. Similar to renewables, the level of investment into lithium ion storage has seen prices decline dramatically. Tesla’s Gigafactory is currently producing batteries at US$190 per kWh, with an expectation of 30% reduction coming from economies of scale, reduction of waste, a closer supply chain, vertical integration and process optimisation.

Much as RPS targets were first introduced on a state by state basis in the US, some US states are now starting to commit to targets for battery storage. So far, California and Oregon have set targets for the development of storage, with Massachusetts potentially the next to implement. California has stipulated that its three large investor-owned utilities (Edison International, PG&E, and Sempra) must commit 1,324 megawatts of storage by 2024, which is around 2% of California’s peak load.

Is energy efficiency real?

Energy efficiency is having an undeniable impact on electricity consumption. Energy intensity, a measure of energy consumption per unit of gross domestic product, declined by nearly one third between 1990 and 2015. Companies in the US are tending to report flat to negative load growth. Some US states, led by California, are promoting energy efficiency by decoupling utilities’ revenues from volume usage.

The driving force behind energy reduction is more energy-efficient homes and appliances. More homes are being insulated, efficient condensing boilers are replacing standard boilers, houses are being double glazed and appliances are more efficient. This trend in energy consumption per household will continue as buildings and appliances get smarter and more energy efficient.

Make hay whilst the sun shines

Rooftop solar has declined in cost significantly. The subsidies that many countries offer encourages residential customers to install rooftop panels on their homes.

Solar photovoltaic – lower costs, higher capacity

Source: Solar Energy Industries Association

However, a mismatch can occur between when solar energy is generated and when it is used. At these times, the distribution grid is used much like storage so that energy can be used when it is needed rather than when produced. For example, New York State is developing a system that compensates both the customer for excess energy sold to the grid, and the grid company for providing the transmission infrastructure to the household. New York aims to transform utilities such as National Grid and Iberdrola into distribution system platform providers, changing their responsibilities to include overseeing the interconnection of distributed resources. We believe this puts these utilities at the forefront of changes that could later be rolled out across other states with sunny climates.

 

Rebecca Sherlock is a Senior Investment Analyst at Colonial First State Global Asset Management. This article provides general information not specific to any investor's circumstances.

 

  •   29 September 2016
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Electricity transmission is Australia's next problem

Momentum or rupture: has demand for oil already peaked?

Ignore solar parity at your investing peril

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.