Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 243

Defaults low but no room for complacency

February is ‘Groundhog Month’ for credit market nerds. Moody’s publishes its annual default study each February and for seven out of ten years, not much happens. This year was one of those, which is good because it means it's been a boring year. Nothing that was investment grade at the start of 2017 defaulted during the year and only around 3% of sub-investment grade issuers defaulted. Overall default rates were just over 1%, which is around median levels.

However, over the last few decades, the overall default and high yield default rates have been boosted by a higher proportion of lower-rated issuers who default more often. The chart below shows this with default rates of ‘Ba’ and ‘high yield’ since 1920. We have also shown the industries which were over-represented during default spikes.

Watch for the once-a-decade jump in defaults

Since the 1970s, there’s been a once-a-decade spike in defaults for investment grade and the upper end of the high yield market. Defaults in those sectors invariably coincide with recessions. For the lower end of the high yield market, there are always defaults, and they become chunky in recessions. Interestingly, there are always industry clusters of defaults. Energy is the most cyclical of industries and the large majority of defaults over the last three years have been due to energy (particularly shale energy) when the oil price fell. However, other sectors which have been disproportionately represented in high-yield defaults include media, construction and finance (during recessions).

Two of our forward indicators are indicating another sleepy year. Moody’s uses a model to predict high yield defaults and it is forecasting that default rates will fall to 1.7% in 2018. If that occurs, it will be the second lowest default rate since 1981. The chart below shows the Kamakura Troubled Company Index, which has been an excellent predictor of the default rates 12 months ahead. It forecast the GFC default avalanche over a year before it happened, and also it picked the peak of defaults in 2009 about 12 months before.

Currently, conditions are in the best 28% of observations since 1990 and it is predicting subdued default activity over the next 12 months.

So where are we?

The standard position for an investment grade credit investor is to remain invested, because the margin over risk-free rates is sufficient to compensate for the default risk. If an investor bought every 5-year ‘BBB’ bond at the start of every year, they would have outperformed the risk-free government bond for that 5-year period in every year but one since the 1950s.

The default cost on that cohort of bonds has (almost always) been less than the additional yield investors receive on ‘BBB’ bonds over the risk-free government bond rate. It's more cyclical lower down the credit spectrum, but over the long run there is always a gain. However, for anyone who can correctly forecast a recession or near recession, selling can be extremely profitable.

Notwithstanding the positive non-recession forecast, there are some issues, including:

  • The non-default cycle is now very long-lived and over the post 1970s pain-free average (but still well below the 1940 to 1970 experience)
  • There has been an overall increase in leverage and other negative debt metrics over the past few years, and valuations are expensive
  • There's no recession in sight and if that continues, we'll see little stress on investment grade or high non-investment grade debt
  • We can't see any obvious industry bubbles and the two largest debt widow-makers (energy and commercial real estate) seem within normal valuation parameters.

However, take a look at the first chart, and see those spikes in defaults every decade or so. High yield defaults around 10% and investment grade around 2% to 4% are not uncommon.

 

Campbell Dawson is Executive Director at Elstree Investment Management Limited. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual investor.

 

4 Comments
stan
March 12, 2018

1 It would help to explain what is meant by "default".
2 Given the track record of the rating agencies (remember GFC ?) why put too much credence on their opinions?
3 Well thought out covenants are potentially more significant in assessing the risks of some bonds.

Campbell Dawson
March 15, 2018

Stan
1)Default is simply if an issuer fails to pay a coupon or redeem principal on time
2) Ratings are suprisingly good at quantifying/predicting default for corporate issuers. The ratings of the so called "structured securities" were much less accurate in predicting the default behaviour of those securities in the GFC (and continue to be less valuable)
Having said that, we think that within the "corporate" realm, credit ratings agencies do better on some industries than others.
3) You may be right. Academic literature is mixed on the value of covenants (probably because they are all different enough that you can't get a big enough sample)

Doug
March 08, 2018

Campbell, good information on an overlooked topic.

This article may prove quite prophetic esp. regarding more marketed unrated and high yield (non-investment grade / junk) bonds

I worry ...
1) new to the industry, mum and dad investor-buyers of unrated and high yield bonds have no history understanding the later surprise default and illiquidity thereafter
2) the bond brokers marketing and arranging these purchases can sometimes rely too easily on general advice and wholesale investor provisions
3) trusting the same brokers as Custodian of the bonds may be Lehman-like inappropriate
4) ASIC's focus is elsewhere
5) professional investors could also be caught out too, forced to take excessive credit risk to combat ultra low interest rates and relatively high (to the cash rate) TD rates

As you said it is all fine until it isn't.

Campbell Dawson
March 15, 2018

Hi Doug,
The best way to access the benefits of high yield is as part of a diversified portfolio strategy and via a very diversified ( ie >50) securities portfolio and to have a > 5 year time frame. There may be investors who don't realise that either the quantum of defaults will increase from the current extremely low levels, or that you need to hold through the cycle.
If an investor does not understand that or is not sufficiently diversified enough, there will inevitably be issues when the next default cycle happens,
The better the credit quality of the portfolio (ie investment grade), the long investment horizon becomes less critical, and a less diversified portfolio would still do ok, although credit is an asset class where holding lots of securities is a free lunch: returns dont fall much and the risk of a single default is far less consequential

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Why would you invest in junk?

What should you look for when investing in private debt?

Tony Togher on why cash isn’t just cash

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Super changes, the Budget and 2021 versus 2022

Josh Frydenberg's third budget contained changes to superannuation and other rules but their effective date is expected to be 1 July 2022. Take care not to confuse them with changes due on 1 July 2021.

Noel's share winners and loser plus budget reality check

Among the share success stories is a poor personal experience as Telstra's service needs improving. Plus why the new budget announcements on downsizing and buying a home don't deserve the super hype.

Grantham interview on the coming day of reckoning

Jeremy Grantham has seen it all before, with bubbles every 15 years or so. The higher you go, the longer and greater the fall. You can have a high-priced asset or a high-yielding asset, but not both at the same time.

Whoyagonnacall? 10 unspoken risks buying off-the-plan

All new apartment buildings have defects, and inexperienced owners assume someone else will fix them. But developers and builders will not volunteer to spend time and money unless someone fights them. Part 1

Buffett says stock picking is too hard for most investors

Warren Buffett explained why he believes most investors should not pick stocks but simply own an S&P 500 index fund. "There's a lot more to picking stocks than figuring out what’s going to be a wonderful industry."

Should investors brace for uncomfortably high inflation?

The global recession came quickly and deeply but it has given way to a strong rebound. What are the lessons for investors, how should a portfolio change and what role will inflation play?

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

ETFs are the Marvel of listed galaxies, even with star WAR

Until 2018, LICs and LITs dominated ETFs, much like the Star Wars franchise was the most lucrative in the world until Marvel came along. Now ETFs are double their rivals, just as Marvel conquered Star Wars.

Shares

Four leading tech stocks now look cheap

There are few opportunities to buy tech heavyweights at attractive prices. In Morningstar’s view, four global leaders are trading at decent discounts to their fair values, indicating potential for upside.

Shares

Why copper prices are at all-time highs

Known as Dr Copper for the uncanny way its price anticipates future economic activity, copper has hit all-time highs. What are the forces at play and strategies to benefit from the electric metal’s strength?

Economy

Baby bust: will infertility shape Australia's future?

In 1961, Australian women had 3.5 children on average but by 2018, this figure stood at just 1.7. Falling fertility creates a shift in demographics and the ratio of retirees to working-age people.

SMSF strategies

The Ultimate SMSF EOFY Checklist 2021

The end of FY2021 means rules and regulations to check for members of public super funds and SMSFs. Take advantage of opportunities but also avoid a knock on the door. Here are 25 items to check.

Economy

How long will the bad inflation news last?

The answer to whether the US inflation increase will prove temporary or permanent depends on the rates of growth of the quantity of money. It needs to be brought down to about 0.3% a month, and that's a problem.

Economy

The ‘cosmic’ forces leading the US to Modern Monetary Theory

If the world’s largest economy adopted a true MMT framework, the investment implications would be enormous. Economic growth would be materially greater but inflation and interest rates would also be much higher.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.