Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 84

Deposit guarantee bill passes but not for super funds

The government guarantee on deposits seems to have been around forever, but it finally cleared its last legislative hurdle on 18 September 2014. The so-called Financial Claims Scheme (FCS) was introduced during the GFC in 2008, but the list of ‘protected accounts’ covered by the guarantee was formally regulated only a few weeks ago in the Banking Amendment (Financial Claims Scheme) Regulation 2014. It’s worth knowing which types of accounts are not covered, including accounts at a foreign branch of an Approved Deposit-Taking Institution (ADI) and foreign branches of Australian ADIs.

For completeness, the protected accounts include: savings, at call, cash management, cheque, current, debit cards, farm management, first home saver, mortgage offsets, pensioner deeming, term deposit, transaction accounts and trustee accounts.

Last week APRA also released a revised FAQ summary on technical issues. It includes Section 5, which states:

Are products marketed as superannuation or retirement products, such as accounts held by SMSFs, protected products?

If a product, which is used for superannuation purposes, satisfies the definition of a protected product account, it is covered under the Financial Claims Scheme … the definition does not depend on what the account is used for, provided it has the legal features of a protected account.”

So that sounds fine for superannuation, but there is a point most commentators are missing.

Lack of coverage of most superannuation deposits

A number of articles on the FCS have appeared in recent weeks making statements such as, “All deposits with Australian ADIs up to $250,000 are covered.” One article then went on to say all term deposits and government bonds are exactly the same credit risk since the government backs both. In seeking the best deal, investors should just find the best rate from an ADI for any particular maturity.

Depositors believe this means that if they place up to $250,000 in a bank (or any ADI) deposit in a public super fund, they will be protected for the full amount. This is incorrect, and here is why.

(This point has been explained in more detail in Cuffelinks previously here, but it is repeated because of the recent passing of the legislation and the incorrect interpretation in other places).

All superannuation money must be invested through a trust that complies with the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. A superannuation fund is a trust controlled by a trust deed. When an investor chooses a deposit option in a superannuation fund, it is the superannuation fund’s trustee which invests with the bank (or ADI). The contract is between the bank and the trust, not the bank and the customer (the 'natural person'), and the trust is a single entity. This is unlike when an investor places a deposit directly with a bank, which is a contract between the customer and the bank.

The FCS applies per account holder per ADI. An account holder is defined as an entity, and both trusts and superannuation funds are entities. Therefore, the $250,000 cap applies to the entire trust, which might have several billion dollars of ‘deposits’ in a single trust. A recovery of $250,000 under the guarantee may make a meaningless contribution to recovering money for an individual depositor if the underlying ADI cannot honour its obligations. The deposit is not effectively covered by the government guarantee.

In other words, there is no ‘look through’ from the trust to the end investor.

This can have important consequences. Any depositor placing $250,000 into a deposit with a public super fund should know which ADI the money is then placed with. If it is a second-tier ADI, the security may not be as good as the investor expects, and there may be little protection from the government guarantee, notwithstanding the super fund placed the money with an ADI.

In fact, if you check the website of various financial institutions, you will find much fanfare about the government guarantee on 'normal' deposits, but no mention of it for deposits in their super fund offerings.

One day, money will be lost in a super fund deposit

The full implications of this difference will only be felt when an ADI is unable to honour its obligations and the government covers the bank deposits but not the superannuation deposits. To make matters worse for public super funds, SMSFs can access the full $250,000 per ADI.

 

Graham Hand was General Manager, Capital Markets at Commonwealth Bank; Deputy Treasurer at State Bank of NSW; Managing Director Treasury at NatWest Markets and General Manager, Funding & Alliances at Colonial First State. Comments are for general purposes and not personal financial advice.

RELATED ARTICLES

APRA imposes Single Customer View (SCV) for government guarantee

Super misses out on government deposit guarantee

3 Comments
Rob
October 20, 2014

So to be clear, if a SMSF has, say, 6 deposits of 250k with each of 6 independent ADIs, all 6 deposits will be guaranteed. Is this correct?

Graham Hand
October 21, 2014

Rob, as you know, we don't offer personal advice, so I'll take this as a general question. Since the guarantee is 'per account holder per ADI', and the SMSF has only $250,000 with each independent ADIs, then all six deposits should be covered.

Kevin
October 19, 2014

Thanks Graham, to me this illustrates once again the calibre and value of articles at Cuffelinks. It took me a great deal of research to conclude that cash holdings in super funds (inc term deposits) were not covered by FCS. Worse still, as you mention the super funds are actively silent and the “experts” are vocally wrong, so I questioned my conclusion until I read your article ‘Super misses out on government deposit guarantee’ in 2013. Although SMSFs seem to be the vehicle of choice, Retirement Savings Accounts are a simple, no fee alternative.

Also worthy of note is the $250K guarantee limit is per ADI, this is important when considering the big banks and their many subsidiaries. APRA list the big banks as ADI’s (ie. their subsidiaries are not listed as separate ADIs), so the $250K limit is spread across that bank and ALL of its subsidiaries.

Examples:

“The FCS applies to deposits held in Westpac Banking Corporation, including its Divisions - RAMS, St.George Bank, Bank of Melbourne, and BankSA.”

“Your deposit(s) with us and the NAB are guaranteed up to a total of $250,000.
The limit applies per customer per institution. That is, the limit applies to the combined total amount of funds you have with both NAB and UBank.”


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you caught in the ‘retirement trap’?

Our retirement savings system is supposed to encourage financial independence but there is a ‘Retirement Trap’ due to the reduction of age pension entitlements as assets and income rise.

The power of letting winners run

Handling extreme winners is a complex task. Conventional wisdom such as “you never go broke taking a profit” often leaves a lot of money on the table as strong growth stocks continue to run.

Tony Togher on why cash isn’t just cash

An active manager of cash and fixed interest funds can achieve higher returns than the cash rate through a selection of other securities while managing both liquidity and income for clients.

NAB hybrid: one says buy, one says sell, you decide

Differences of opinion make a market, and hybrid specialists disagree on the likelihood that NAB will call one of its hybrids early. It makes a major difference to the expected return on NABHA.

Watch your SMSF’s annual return this year

The best way to preserve your SMSF’s favoured status is to make sure the fund’s annual return reaches the ATO on time. There are new rules this year that every SMSF trustee should know.

Worshipping at the altar of alternative assets

Investors worried about an overvalued sharemarket and low interest rates on term deposits and bonds are focusing on alternatives. What are they and how are they used by leading asset allocators?

Latest Updates

Interviews

Kunal Kapoor on different paths to investor success

The Morningstar CEO on democratising investing, why saving in your youth is crucial, and why most investors care more about paying off their debts than comparing their results against benchmarks.

Investment strategies

Do sin stocks really give your portfolio the edge?

Should sin stocks, those companies who engage in activities that are considered unethical or immoral, be excluded from a portfolio, or would this compromise potential performance?

Economy

What is the likely effect of COVID-19 on the Australian economy?

Our close links to China mean the impact of the virus could tip the local economy into recession and certain sectors such as resources, education and travel will be harder hit than others.

Insurance

Poor pricing of life insurance products and the impact on Australians

The use of discounted pricing by insurers to attract new business is unsustainable and leaves existing policyholders on higher premiums for what is essentially the same product.

Retirement

Spotting signs of trouble in a retirement portfolio

Do you risk paying a lot of tax in accumulation phase? Or, if you're in retirement phase, do you face the risk of outliving your asset pool? Two key things to consider in the low-rate world of today.

Sponsors

Alliances