Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 436

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

Every quarter, the ATO releases an SMSF statistical report. It is usually followed by an influx of commentators, usually non-SMSF specialists, deriding the SMSF sector for asset class concentration and lack of diversification, particularly in relation to international exposure.

These claims are usually based on false assumptions that are not from the ATO but by the commentators. 

The key mistakes made by some analysts are that:

1. the data is as at the quarterly publication date

2. the ATO is reporting actual asset allocation

3. all superannuation asset allocations have been reported in the same way.

Here is the latest ATO data published in September 2021, supposedly effective for 30 June 2021.

Source: ATO SMSF statistical report 30 June 2021

So why should these assumptions be looked at more closely and why is care needed when using the data for determining how SMSFs invest?

We need to examine where the data comes from and what is its real use.

What date applies to the data?

The ATO’s source of SMSF investment data is Section H the SMSF regulatory return that is lodged each year. The timing of the actual lodgement will depend on the SMSF which may mean its return may not be lodged until May the following year.

As a consequence, the primary source of data now is still the FY2020 returns, not the 2021 returns. We also know that the ATO does take some time to analyse each year's regulatory return data as they publish an annual statistical summary and the latest was published in March 2021 based on the 2018-19 data, which suggest there is still a wait before the 2020 data will be ready.

This means the statistical report published in September 2021 is at best an extrapolation of the 30 June 2020 data. At its worst it is extrapolation of FY2019 data only which means some data is 27 months out of date by September 2021. 

SMSF cash holdings overstated

The time delay in reporting means any actual investment decisions made by all SMSF trustees since 1 July 2020 are not directly reflected in the September 2021 publication. This is most obviously reflected in the cash holdings for SMSFs.

Most contributions received by the SMSF sector are NOT employer contributions, particularly Superannuation Guarantee (only 20% of all super contributions received by SMSFs) as is the case for APRA funds (80% of all contributions made to these funds) which are required to be paid quarterly throughout the year (APRA funds are the large institutional funds).

Most SMSF member contributions are made in the June quarter each financial year and often not invested by 30 June each year (but may well be invested after 30 June) resulting in an overstatement of the level of cash in SMSFs.

In addition, 45% of SMSFs are partially or fully in pension phase compared with about 15% of the amount in APRA funds. SMSFs have negative cashflow from contributions versus benefit payments compared with APRA funds and thus hold a higher amount in cash to meet their pension obligations.

The combination of accumulation funds having year-end contribution receipts and pension-paying funds holding cash to make payments results in a higher than average cash level on the 30 June reporting date.

The classifications are not even asset classes

The categories in the SMSF regulatory return are not asset classes but structures. That is, how does the SMSF hold its assets and where are the structures based.

The major classifications are Australian managed investments, Australian direct investments and overseas direct investments. While some of the direct investment classifications align with asset classes (such as real property) this is not the case for others.

For example, in the case are listed and unlisted trusts (of which managed investment schemes such as managed funds are the most common), the classification does not reflect the type of assets in the trust. Allocating these funds to a specific asset class is speculation. Managed funds can invest in a range of different asset asset classes from diversified funds (balanced or growth funds), sector or even sub sector specific (international equities, small caps, mortgage) or even specific purpose funds (income funds, absolute return etc).

Listed trusts are vehicles investing in real property, ASX-listed shares, international shares, private equity and specialist assets or business sectors. The listed share category includes Listed Investment Companies (LICs) and ETFs in this category.

This results in commentary, particularly about underexposure to international markets, based on the tiny percentage of directly-held international assets. The reality is that most international assets are held through vehicles such as managed funds and more recently, ETFs.

The ATO data is also significantly different from the categories APRA uses to collect investment data about those funds, which is not sourced from those funds' tax returns.

What is the ATO really reporting?

So, this begs the question why does the ATO classify the investments this way?

The rationale for this classification is about data matching of fund income. As anyone who has seen e-tax, the ATO can pre-populate a significant range of income sources for a taxpayer and that potentially includes an SMSF, even if the ATO does not provide this.

This is achieved as investment providers are required to collect the Tax File Number of the investor. These bodies then provide information to the ATO about the income they earn and pay to each investor.

So, if you earn interest from an investment then the bank, note or debenture issuer will advise the ATO the amount of interest you were paid along with your name and TFN. For listed securities, the registry provides the dividend details (cash dividend and franking amount) as well as your details.

If you invest in a managed fund, a wrap platform or managed account, the product provider has a similar obligation to provide an Annual Investment Income Report to the ATO. It outlines the underlying taxable transaction that gave rise to a taxable income for the investor. This includes interest, dividends (including franking credits) and realised capital gains.

Even small entities have reporting obligations that allow this data matching, and trusts must provide trustee beneficiary statements attached to the trust tax return.

It's little use for asset allocation

All this data does is enable the ATO to verify both where the SMSF holds its investments and the taxable income it declares in its tax return against information already provided to the ATO.

So next time an analyst or commentator uses this asset allocation data, think again about what it really is.


Philip La Greca is Executive Manager of SMSF Technical and Strategic Solutions at SuperConcepts, a leading provider of SMSF services.


andrew brown
December 07, 2021

always someone chasing your funds in SMSF and the easiest way is to get ATO to restrict allocations to satisfy private sector funds. The idea behind the SMSF is investing freedom so risk kevel is at descretion of SMSF. I had a portion in higher risk area and return was 400% in 12 months never to be achieved with industry or private sector funds. Investor choice of SMSF is is at trustees choice which is why i have a SMSF. if i wanted a typical investor industry fund return of 10-20% it would take many ears more than 10 years to achieve same result.

SMSF Trustee
December 07, 2021

andrew brown, I think you've misunderstood the point of the article. The ATO does not restrict allocations, this is just data collection for a particular purpose and the article points out that the purpose isn't all that useful for most people wanting to know how SMSF's are investing their funds.

Bully for you getting 400% return, but please come back and let us know after the year in which you go down by 75%, resulting in an annual average return about the same as every one else is getting. Which will surely happen, unless you now lock in your windfall gain and invest more conservatively.

Ross Clare
December 06, 2021

It is always good to see analysis unravelling published numbers. However, even when you adjust the cash holdings of SMSFs for any personal contributions not yet invested the cash percentage remains high. Personal contributions for the entire 2018-19 were around $12 billion, around 1.5% of the total assets of SMSFs. According to the ATO data, around 20% of SMSFs had cash and term deposit holdings amounting to more than 50% of the total assets of each fund.
There are challenges as well in estimating the percentage of assets of APRA regulated funds that are invested overseas. There is a published split for most categories, but not for some categories such as property and listed infrastructure.

John Wilson
December 05, 2021

Well said!
I would go a further step in regards to the % international shares in a portfolio. CSL, James Hardie, Peninsula Energy etc are largely, if not wholly, overseas businesses even though listed in Australia. Some investments, such as WAM Global and Pengana International are, as their names indicate, invested in international companies but are listed in Australia.
Such shares are affected by business conditions and subject to exchange rates in their overseas investments. If one seeks to diversify, these shares do in fact provide exposure to international markets.
The simplistic classification into Australian and overseas listings is nonsense.

Jesse Nihill
December 02, 2021

Well written Philip.

This has been a bug bear of mine for many years.


Leave a Comment:



ATO confirms SMSF global allocation “strongly understated”

Three areas SMSFs should consider outsourcing

Worried about low rates, SMSFs drop banks and diversify


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.