Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 386

Three areas SMSFs should consider outsourcing

Just under one-third of SMSF assets (31%) are currently invested in direct shares, according to the 2020 Vanguard/Investment Trends SMSF Report. Direct property accounts for 16% of SMSF assets, while 27% of assets are currently held in cash and cash products.

By comparison, just 19% of SMSF assets are held in managed investments (11% listed, 8% unlisted). The bias towards direct ownership is understandable given the stated desire of SMSF trustees to have more control over their investments.

Here are three areas where it may make sense for SMSFs to outsource to external managers.

1. Global equities

SMSFs are often criticised for being underweight global equities relative to APRA-regulated funds. One often-cited reason is that international equities don’t receive the franking credits that are applied to Australian shares, leading to an outsized ‘home bias’ to domestic equities among SMSFs. While franking credits certainly have value, there are broader diversification benefits to having exposure to share markets outside Australia.

For SMSFs that want to invest in global equities, it makes more sense to use an external manager than purchase shares directly (indeed, there is evidence trustees are already doing this). First, a well-diversified portfolio of international shares can be cumbersome and difficult to manage for an individual investor. Second, it can be tricky to get exposure across all markets. Finally, currency fluctuations need to be considered and managed.

2. Small and microcaps

Small caps have the potential to deliver higher returns to investors but, inevitably, the trade-off is higher risk. So it pays to choose a small cap manager with a proven track record of identifying under-researched and undervalued companies.

For example, the technology sector – including biotechnology or software – requires a nuanced understanding of the intellectual property behind the company. But more important is how the company will monetise the technology and what value the market will ultimately ascribe to it.

Professional managers have the time and resources to research and monitor many of the 2,000 stocks that sit outside the S&P/ASX200. So while it might make sense to go direct for the large cap end of the market, it could reduce headaches for SMSFs if they enlist fund managers to help with small and microcap stocks.

3. Responsible investment

This approach to investing money has performed strongly in recent years, particularly during the volatility of the first half of 2020. However, it is a resource-intensive approach to investment management that can be tricky for DIY investors to replicate.

Responsible investing is referred to by many different names: ethical investing, sustainable investing, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing – just to name a few.

While each strategy has its own features, most responsible investors are united by their decision to sign the international Principles of Responsible Investment. The principles begin by declaring that professional investors “have a duty to act in the best long-term interests of their beneficiaries”.

Furthermore, responsible investors agree that traditionally non-financial issues related to the environment, society and corporate governance can affect the performance of investment portfolios.

SMSFs looking to make a positive impact with their investments as well as achieving strong returns should consider a responsible investment manager. But with the flurry of activity in this sector in recent years it can be hard to identify the right fund for you.

In fact, one of the difficulties for investors when choosing a responsible investment manager is deciphering how they implement non-financial analysis into their process, and how much impact this analysis actually has on the portfolio.

Morningstar’s ESG Commitment Level

Helpfully, a new white paper from Morningstar has laid out the level of ESG commitment of 40 asset managers and 107 investment strategies. It aims to distinguish funds that “truly focus on sustainable investing” from those that incorporate ESG factors but in a limited way.

Morningstar’s new qualitative ESG Commitment Level is entirely separate from the Morningstar Analyst Rating and is designed to be read in conjunction with the existing (quantitative) Morningstar Sustainability Rating. Many investors, according to the report, “feel confused about the claims they hear and read in sales materials and are unsure about the many different approaches to sustainable investing”.

It is pleasing to see Australian Ethical named as one of only six asset managers worldwide – and the only Australian investment manager – to receive the highest ESG Commitment Level of ‘leader’. Fund managers in this category have been identified by Morningstar as having a long history of commitment to ESG investing, with these considerations “ingrained and pervasive” across the firms.

When outsourcing is your best bet

Many SMSFs relish the ability to control all their investments. For some asset classes that can make some sense, but when it comes to areas like international equities, small caps and responsible investment it’s worthwhile to consider outsourcing to professional fund managers.


David Macri is the Chief Investment Officer of Australian Ethical Investment, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This information is of a general nature and is not intended to provide you with financial advice or take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from Australian Ethical, please click here.


December 08, 2020

Many of us SMSF trustees have diverse experience in business too. My own fund which is now 25 years along, has seen a lot. I am absolutely aware that there are funds and advisors who have a better track record than me. Compound growth exceeding 20% p.a. for the life of my fund is something that I am happy with and there it is! I don't want the best, I want to understand what I invest in and I enjoy the research. My one employed expert is my accountant who ensures that I meet the regulatory requirements. So yes, some of us like to be in control, (if there is such a thing), and yes, we might pay a price for that. With some active fund managers finding ways to creep their take using out-performance bonuses and the like, I am also confident that many funds probably do worse than I do too.

Jerome Lander
December 06, 2020

The most valuable components of a portfolio are worth outsourcing given the high level of expertise and time required to manage these successfully. These are:
(1) Asset allocation and portfolio construction - to a genuinely active and skilled portfolio manager
(2) Active strategy and manager selection requiring skilled manager selection and dynamic allocations (e.g. which strategies to use, how much, when to change weightings?). This includes the use of Alternatives.

Of course, finding a proven manager to outsource these aspects to isn't that easy, as these skill sets are rare indeed. It requires the identification of a highly focussed and experienced person and investment capability.

December 05, 2020

I trade global shares on a local platform. A little bit of effort to set it all up but easy and cheap to use. Highly recommended.

December 04, 2020

Control in SMSFs must be calibrated to trustees' knowledge, skills and time allocation. The three areas make sense in this sense. Those who are unwilling and or unable to directly invest in Australian equities, bonds, hybrids or property might take recourse to ETFs in these sectors, as costs are a certainty while earnings are at best iffy.
Assets uncorrelated to traditional classes (gold, infrastructure, derivatives) might also be accessed through outsourcing, as long as the trustees understand the risks and expected rewards.
Beyond ESG, a moralistic perspective (about alcohol; tobacco; gambling; slave labour...) adds another dimension to filter out undesirables.

December 04, 2020

On global equities, accessing funds and ETFs is easy but it's also now not difficult to open an account to transact on foreign exchanges or local versions such as TraCRs.


Leave a Comment:



SMSFs the new battleground in family disputes

ATO confirms SMSF global allocation “strongly understated”

6 quick SMSF tips for the 2021/22 financial year


Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates


10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?


Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?


D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.


Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.


Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.