Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 641

Don’t rush to sell your home to fund aged care

For years, the mantra around aged care and the family home was simple: think twice before you sell. But in a post-November 1 world with changing rules and financial implications that reach well beyond emotional ties, that advice has shifted to thinking three times.

Many people believe selling the family home is the only way to fund aged care, particularly when faced with the refundable accommodation deposit (RAD) that is normally hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The fact that any unpaid RAD incurs interest at 7.61% per annum can make it seem like a no-brainer – after all, a $750,000 RAD equates to $57,075 a year. The numbers are big and selling the house feels like a simple way to make it all work.

But in numerous instances, keeping your home can provide significant financial advantages, ones you can’t get from any other asset.

One of the biggest misconceptions is that the family home is fully assessed for aged care fees. It’s not. When you move into aged care, the value of your home is only counted in the means test up to a capped value of $210,555. This cap can make a dramatic difference.

Most homes are worth substantially more than the cap. If you have a $1.2 million home then the cap effectively exempts $1 million of it. If you sell the home and pay the RAD, all the money you put into the RAD is included in your aged care assets and any money left over counts towards your aged care and pension means tests.

Selling the family home can feel like the simplest solution – but simple isn’t always smart.

There’s a second consideration: your RAD is exempt from your pension assets test. If you keep your home, it’s not counted towards the pension assets test for two years after you move into aged care. If you are a couple, the clock starts ticking only when the second person leaves.

However, there is a new piece of the puzzle – the exit fee on your RAD. Before November 1, paying a refundable accommodation deposit meant exactly that: all of your money was refunded when you left. Now, there is an exit fee of up to 10 per cent if you stay for five years or more.

Paying by RAD could see a significant portion of your capital disappear; on a $750,000 RAD you would lose $75,000 after five years. While there are certainly no guarantees, keeping your home could preserve the value of your capital and potentially grow it.

Keeping the home isn’t free and doesn’t suit everyone, but the point is that you have options. And it’s worth seeking advice to work out which one is best for you. Selling the family home can feel like the simplest solution – but simple isn’t always smart. The capped value for aged care, two-year pension exemption, and new RAD exit fees mean the financial scales have shifted.

In such a complex environment, it’s literally a case of thinking three times before you act.

 

Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of advisers dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including best-seller 'Aged Care, Who Cares?' and 'Downsizing Made Simple'.

 

  •   10 December 2025
  • 7
  •      
  •   
7 Comments
Dudley
December 11, 2025


"Where are the nurses cleaners and cooks etc that I need to look after me in a care facility going to get affordable housing":
In your home could be a good outcome.

4
Graham W
December 11, 2025

I believe that the average stay in age care is only two years, so paying the RAD seems to not be answer. It will not be an option to sell the house for me and my wife as in a few years we will be sharing our house with family.Meeting the interest will be met from combined investments.

Jack
December 15, 2025

I’m confused. In one sentence “all the money you put into the RAD is included in your aged care assets”
In the next sentence “your RAD is exempt from your pension assets test”
So which is it?

AJ
December 15, 2025

Both are true Jack.
Any RAD is assessable for Aged Care fee calculation purposes (for fees determined by income and assets like the Non-Clinical Care Contribution for example).
And, any RAD is exempt for Age Pension means testing puposes.

Steve
January 01, 2026

Believe me people, I have just done it and the crooks in aged care stack it against you, I thought the RAD was exempt and it is for the pension but its not for the meas test on the fees they charge you, eg my dad paid the full RAD sold his house so someone else has somewhere to live, and now he is getting hit over $8000.00 per month in accomodation fees made up of 4
$45 dollars a day extra service fee, that the government lets them charge+ $65 dollars a day aged care service fee+ get this the kicker up to 80k over the first 2 years because thats the average life expectancy once your in there, so that another $8500 per month, My father is currently paying $12000 per month on top of the RAD, stinks

Dudley
January 02, 2026


"My father is currently paying $12000 per month on top of the RAD":

Not obvious how to compute from your numbers. Could you re-state?

Why does not he buy a home and hire help?
= 12 * $12,000
= $144,000 / y.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Seniors living is becoming a mainstream investment

10 things I learned about dementia and care homes from close range

Are lifetime income streams the answer or just the easy way out?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, 2025 edition

Two years ago, I wrote an article suggesting that the odds favoured ASX shares easily outperforming residential property over the next decade. Here’s an update on where things stand today.

Australia's retirement system works brilliantly for some - but not all

The superannuation system has succeeded brilliantly at what it was designed to do: accumulate wealth during working lives. The next challenge is meeting members’ diverse needs in retirement. 

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

The 3 biggest residential property myths

I am a professional real estate investor who hears a lot of opinions rather than facts from so-called experts on the topic of property. Here are the largest myths when it comes to Australia’s biggest asset class.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Investment strategies

21 reasons we’re nearing the end of a secular bull market

Nearly all the indicators an investor would look for suggest that this secular bull market is approaching its end. My models forecast that the US is set for 0% annual returns over the next decade.

Property

13 million spare bedrooms: Rethinking Australia’s housing shortfall

We don’t have a housing shortage; we have housing misallocation. This explores why so many bedrooms go unused, what’s been tried before, and five things to unlock housing capacity – no new building required.

Investment strategies

Market entry – dip your toe or jump in all at once?

Lump sum investing usually wins, but it can hurt if markets fall. Using 50 years of Australian data, we reveal when staging your entry protects you, and when it drags on returns. 

Investment strategies

The US$21 trillion question: is AI an opportunity or excess?

It has been years since the US stock market has been so focused on a single driving theme, and AI is unquestionably that theme. This explores what it means for US and global markets in 2026.

Economy

US energy strategy holds lessons for Australia

The US has elevated energy to a national security priority, tying cheap, reliable power to economic strength, AI leadership, and sovereignty. This analyses the new framework and its implications for Australia.

Strategy

Venezuela’s democratic roots are deeper than Trump knows

Most people know Maduro was a dictator and Venezuela has oil. Few grasp the depth of suffering or the country’s democratic history - essential context as the US ousts Maduro and charts Venezuela’s future. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.