Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 641

Don’t rush to sell your home to fund aged care

For years, the mantra around aged care and the family home was simple: think twice before you sell. But in a post-November 1 world with changing rules and financial implications that reach well beyond emotional ties, that advice has shifted to thinking three times.

Many people believe selling the family home is the only way to fund aged care, particularly when faced with the refundable accommodation deposit (RAD) that is normally hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The fact that any unpaid RAD incurs interest at 7.61% per annum can make it seem like a no-brainer – after all, a $750,000 RAD equates to $57,075 a year. The numbers are big and selling the house feels like a simple way to make it all work.

But in numerous instances, keeping your home can provide significant financial advantages, ones you can’t get from any other asset.

One of the biggest misconceptions is that the family home is fully assessed for aged care fees. It’s not. When you move into aged care, the value of your home is only counted in the means test up to a capped value of $210,555. This cap can make a dramatic difference.

Most homes are worth substantially more than the cap. If you have a $1.2 million home then the cap effectively exempts $1 million of it. If you sell the home and pay the RAD, all the money you put into the RAD is included in your aged care assets and any money left over counts towards your aged care and pension means tests.

Selling the family home can feel like the simplest solution – but simple isn’t always smart.

There’s a second consideration: your RAD is exempt from your pension assets test. If you keep your home, it’s not counted towards the pension assets test for two years after you move into aged care. If you are a couple, the clock starts ticking only when the second person leaves.

However, there is a new piece of the puzzle – the exit fee on your RAD. Before November 1, paying a refundable accommodation deposit meant exactly that: all of your money was refunded when you left. Now, there is an exit fee of up to 10 per cent if you stay for five years or more.

Paying by RAD could see a significant portion of your capital disappear; on a $750,000 RAD you would lose $75,000 after five years. While there are certainly no guarantees, keeping your home could preserve the value of your capital and potentially grow it.

Keeping the home isn’t free and doesn’t suit everyone, but the point is that you have options. And it’s worth seeking advice to work out which one is best for you. Selling the family home can feel like the simplest solution – but simple isn’t always smart. The capped value for aged care, two-year pension exemption, and new RAD exit fees mean the financial scales have shifted.

In such a complex environment, it’s literally a case of thinking three times before you act.

 

Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of advisers dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including best-seller 'Aged Care, Who Cares?' and 'Downsizing Made Simple'.

 

  •   10 December 2025
  • 8
  •      
  •   
8 Comments
Dudley
December 11, 2025


"Where are the nurses cleaners and cooks etc that I need to look after me in a care facility going to get affordable housing":
In your home could be a good outcome.

5
Graham W
December 11, 2025

I believe that the average stay in age care is only two years, so paying the RAD seems to not be answer. It will not be an option to sell the house for me and my wife as in a few years we will be sharing our house with family.Meeting the interest will be met from combined investments.

Jack
December 15, 2025

I’m confused. In one sentence “all the money you put into the RAD is included in your aged care assets”
In the next sentence “your RAD is exempt from your pension assets test”
So which is it?

AJ
December 15, 2025

Both are true Jack.
Any RAD is assessable for Aged Care fee calculation purposes (for fees determined by income and assets like the Non-Clinical Care Contribution for example).
And, any RAD is exempt for Age Pension means testing puposes.

Steve
January 01, 2026

Believe me people, I have just done it and the crooks in aged care stack it against you, I thought the RAD was exempt and it is for the pension but its not for the meas test on the fees they charge you, eg my dad paid the full RAD sold his house so someone else has somewhere to live, and now he is getting hit over $8000.00 per month in accomodation fees made up of 4
$45 dollars a day extra service fee, that the government lets them charge+ $65 dollars a day aged care service fee+ get this the kicker up to 80k over the first 2 years because thats the average life expectancy once your in there, so that another $8500 per month, My father is currently paying $12000 per month on top of the RAD, stinks

Dudley
January 02, 2026


"My father is currently paying $12000 per month on top of the RAD":

Not obvious how to compute from your numbers. Could you re-state?

Why does not he buy a home and hire help?
= 12 * $12,000
= $144,000 / y.

2
Lynette
March 23, 2026

Steve I’m so sorry that your father is vulnerable and being taken advantage of. Aged care is so hard to navigate when you think your doing the right thing

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Seniors living is becoming a mainstream investment

Super is catching up, but ageing is a triple-threat

10 things I learned about dementia and care homes from close range

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.