Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 608

Duration: Friend or foe in a defensive allocation?

Before the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC), duration – a measure of a bond portfolio’s sensitivity to interest rates – was the bedrock of defensive allocations in investor portfolios.

However, in more recent times, this has changed - duration has been in the doghouse with Australian investors. And for good reason.

Low bond yields meant traditional fixed rate bonds paid very little income.

Low bond yields also weakened the defensive qualities of duration; the negative stock-bond correlation became less reliable. 2022 encapsulated these concerns, with bonds selling off in tandem with equities. Bonds failed to deliver on their defensive promise exactly when it was needed the most.

But one thing we know for sure is that markets are always evolving. And today, an important question investors should be asking is whether duration is still something to be feared.

A new era for duration: Learning from 2022

Many investors were understandably scarred by 2022. US equities declined by 18% and, while bonds did better, they too saw a decline of 13%.

It is important to put this in historical context – this was the first time in almost 50 years that both equities and bonds declined in the same year. And going back to 1977, there have only been 5 years in which bonds delivered negative returns. 2022 was unusual!

What drove negative returns for bonds that year? One of the most aggressive interest rate hike cycles we’ve seen in modern history. The Federal Reserve hiked the US cash rate by 4.25% (equivalent of 17 standard hikes!); the RBA was not far behind raising the cash rate by 3%.

Though this experience remains fresh in our minds, it is important to understand that a repeat of 2022 is very unlikely today. Our starting point is a much higher cash rate. Though a little above central bank targets, US inflation also sits in a comfortable range. The Federal Reserve sees rates as overly restrictive and expects to cut down to a 3% cash rate over the coming years. This would be positive for bond returns – a far cry from what we saw in 2022.

2022 was the first time in nearly 50 years that stocks and bonds both delivered negative returns

Past results are not a guarantee of future results. As at 31 December 2022 in USD terms. Returns above reflect annual total returns for all years. Stocks represented by the MSCI World Index. Bonds represented by the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Sources: Capital Group, Bloomberg Index Services Ltd., MSCI.

The often-overlooked benefits of duration

We believe that in stable market environments duration can be valuable in investor portfolios.

Firstly, duration has historically provided investors additional yield (or income) in portfolios. This benefit can be proxied by looking at the difference in yield between longer-duration bonds (e.g. 10 Year US Treasuries) and equivalent quality short-duration bonds (e.g. 3 Month Treasuries). As shown in the chart below, over the last 30 years this gap has averaged at 1.3%. In other words, an investor would have earned an additional 1.3% p.a. by allocating to fixed rate, duration exposed bonds.

The last two years have been quite unusual in that yield curves have been flat or even inverted. This has been normalising in recent quarters, and we expect to see term premia gradually return to levels closer to historical ranges.

Duration has provided additional income in most environments

Past results are not a guarantee of future results. As at 31 January 2025 in USD terms. Source: Bloomberg.

Secondly – and potentially more importantly today - duration has historically been a good diversifier of equity risk (don’t forget this key role of fixed income in a portfolio context).

In every significant equity drawdown over the last 25 years except for 2022, “hard duration” (proxied by US Treasuries) has provided positive returns, as shown in the chart below. In the uncertain times we now find ourselves in, this diversification benefit is critical. It allows investors to lean into their growth assets (e.g. equities, private credit etc.) with confidence, knowing that there is a strong defensive ballast there to provide potential protection in an unexpected downturn.

Historically, duration has been a good diversifier of equity risk

Past results are not a guarantee of future results. Data from January 2000 to December 2024, in USD terms. Source: Bloomberg. US equities represented by the S&P 500 Index. US Treasuries represented by the Bloomberg US Treasury Index. Analysis looks at equity market drawdowns greater than +10% since 2000.

When thinking about the diversification benefits of bonds, it is worthwhile considering floating rate credit – now a ‘go-to’ fixed interest allocation for Australian investors.

Stating the obvious, floating rate bonds have negligible duration exposure. This means that their price is not impacted by interest rate moves. For example, if a central bank cuts rates in response to an economic downturn, floating rate bonds would not benefit from capital appreciation. This means the diversification benefit of floating rate bonds is limited.

This is illustrated clearly in the chart below, comparing the return of fixed vs. floating rate bonds during equity market downturns. Fixed rate bonds (with approx. 5 years of duration) have generated much stronger returns during equity market downturns compared to floating rate. If we exclude 2022 – an unusual ‘one-in-fifty-year’ occurrence – the diversification benefit of fixed rate bonds is even more pronounced.

While floating rate credit can add value in a portfolio, its role as a defensive ballast is not necessarily a strength.

Fixed rate bonds have provided stronger diversification benefits compared to floating rate

Past results are not a guarantee of future results. Data from December 2000 to December 2024, in AUD terms. Source: Bloomberg. AU fixed rate bonds represented by the Bloomberg AusBond Composite Index. AU floating rate bonds represented by the Bloomberg AusBond Composite Index. AU equities represented by the ASX200 Index.

Duration’s diversification benefits are more reliable today

More so than the last few years, fixed rate bonds today are well placed to provide this diversification within an equity dominated portfolio. Higher cash rates mean there is more room for bond yields to fall, which can provide greater capital appreciation during risk-off events.

Moreover, central banks now have both the ability and the willingness to cut rates when economic conditions worsen. This was less feasible in 2022 when cash rates were near zero and fighting inflation was the main priority.

This shift in the Fed’s reaction function (and the market’s anticipation of what the Fed might do) was clearly illustrated in early August 2024. At that time, a weaker-than-expected labour report in the US and lower market liquidity led to a correction in equity markets and increased expectations for Fed rate cuts. As equity markets sold off, higher quality bonds partially offset this with positive returns. With inflation now under better control, the Fed’s dual mandate of managing inflation and employment has enabled it to shift its focus towards supporting the labour market.

Diversification in action

Past results are not a guarantee of future results. Data from 30 June 2024 to 12 August 2024, in USD terms. The investment results shown here are for S&P 500 Index (net dividends reinvested) and Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Total Return USD Hedged Index. Source: Bloomberg. Fed: Federal Reserve. IG: Investment grade.

A time to be on friendlier terms with duration

Two years on from 2022 and investors remain cautious about duration.

However, we think now is the time to reconsider your biases. With heightened geopolitical uncertainty, having a strong ballast is crucial in a portfolio. And duration can play a key role in delivering that.

A combination of higher bond yields and a change in the macroeconomic environment means duration can now bring several potential benefits back to bond portfolios.

  • Additional yield compensation: Comparable to pre-GFC levels
  • Returning diversification benefits: Providing stability during market downturns
  • Lower risk of a 2022-style intervention from central banks: Reduced likelihood of aggressive rate hikes

As a result, we think investors could benefit from adding a moderate amount of duration back into portfolios.

Doing this within a wrapper of a high-quality global credit strategy could be particularly attractive given the potential to earn additional income and take advantage of mispricing across this very broad universe.

 

Haran Karunakaran is an Investment Director at Capital Group (Australia), a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Please seek financial advice before acting on any investment as market circumstances can change.

For more articles and papers from Capital Group, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Red pill or blue pill? Navigating the matrix of fixed income

Fixed income investing when rates are rising

Fixed income solutions in a rising rate environment

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.