Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 42

Fixed income investing when rates are rising

Recent financial headlines have focussed on the timing of the US Federal Reserve ‘tapering’ its purchases of long-dated US bonds. A consequence of any tapering - rising US interest rates - continues to raise it head.

The rising interest rate topic first made headlines in the US in 2010, and then again in 2011 and 2012, but only in 2013 have we seen the first sustained increase in long bond yields. For some investors, rising interest rates are a good thing, with potential for increased returns on the billions of dollars holed up in cash and short term deposits, whilst for holders of long-dated bonds, rising interest rates may be cause for concern.

Interest rates and bond prices

Bond prices and interest rates usually move in opposite directions. This means that when interest rates rise, bond prices tend to fall, and vice versa. For example, if you pay $100 for a bond with a face value of $100 paying a 5% coupon, and interest rates then rise to 6% for the same maturity, the value of your bond will fall in price to equate to 6% yield to maturity.

For the past 30 years, developed market bonds - represented in bond indices by the United States, Japan and the core Euro region which make up over 90% of traditional bond indices - have had the tailwind of falling interest rates, delivering capital gains in addition to regular income. However, with long bond rates only a little above their 30 year lows, the future expected return from long term bonds is more cautious.

But opportunities to make money in bonds still exist. Notably, one of the major changes to bond markets over the past 30 years, and especially in the last 10 years, is the significant increase in the supply of bonds from a wide variety of new issuers, including Emerging Market countries, and companies the world over.

This broadening of bond markets provides opportunities to diversify bond portfolios by investing in economies and companies not linked solely to the economic fortunes of developed markets. This is a good thing, given the limited appeal of investing in developed country bonds, where real interest rates (nominal interest rates less inflation) currently provide little, or even a negative return to bond holders.

These low rates are a deliberate policy, with Quantitative Easing (QE) initiated by the US Federal Reserve to support the US economy, and designed to exert downward influence on bond rates. The theory is that lower long term rates make companies more willing to borrow to invest and expand their businesses, resulting in economic expansion and increasing employment. The QE policy has been implemented by ‘printing’ US dollars which has also had the added benefit of lowering the US dollar.

So far our discussion has focussed mainly on government bonds, but it’s important to note that not all fixed income is created equal. Some securities are more sensitive to interest rate movements than others, and some deliver strong performance in a rising interest rate environment.

Reducing interest rate sensitivity

The following fixed income strategies tend to have lower interest rate sensitivity:

  1. Credit-oriented strategies, and in particular, non-investment grade sectors such as high yield corporate bonds and corporate bank loans tend to be more correlated to the overall economic outlook and corporate earnings than interest rates. Improved balance sheets and liquidity, healthier credit ratios and increased credit availability may reduce the impact of rising interest rates.
  2. Short-duration strategies such as short term bonds and floating rate bank loans have lower sensitivity to rates than their longer duration counterparts, and they can capitalise on the higher income from rising rates more quickly.
  3. Global fixed income strategies offer diversification through exposure to bonds and currencies which seek to capitalise on differing business cycles and economic conditions around the world. In some cases they offer not only higher yields, but also the potential for currency appreciation.

There are many different countries, yield curves, and currencies to invest in. Importantly, in the current environment, seeking strategies that can diversify away from traditional bond benchmarks, such as the Barclays Global Aggregate Benchmark, in which the most indebted nations (and potentially those will less ability to repay) of the US, Japan and core Euro region dominate, will be critical to minimise the risk of losses, and achieve positive returns for investors as global rates continue to rise.

Bonds continue to provide significant diversification benefits for investors, and in most cases offer negative correlation to equities. This reduces portfolio volatility and provides the shock absorber for portfolios in times of economic and equity market stress. These positive characteristics should not be forgotten even though the bond investing environment is more challenging looking forward.

Jim McKay is Director of Advisory Services at Franklin Templeton Investments.


December 04, 2013

"Lower long term rates make companies more willing to borrow to invest and expand their businesses, resulting in economic expansion and increasing employment..."

Interest rates are just one of the factors that govern investment decisions. A company's own debt level, access to funds, and the expected return generated by investment (the spread between the asset return vs debt liability) are major determinants.

Mostly, though, businesses invest when they are swamped with demand for their products, not the reverse.

The quote from your article above describes the trickle-down effect (or supply-side concept) that suggests, in homily fashion, that a rising tide (of investment, but mostly tax breaks for business and high income earners) lifts all boats. However, as reality has so rudely demonstrated, the returns to labour and capital are far from proportional. Trickle-down policies like QE don't work.

QE simply does not work to boost the economy because there isn't a reliable transmission mechanism. Merely trying to reduce rates by an extra 50bps or so while the private sector prefers to 'net save' and deleverage is just madness (but they're trying it anyway ... still).

And the Fed hasn't been 'printing' money as you say. It has been crediting bank reserve accounts with reserves (which aren't 'tinder' for future lending by banks), whilst taking higher income-producing bonds out of the system. It is an asset swap with no net increase in financial assets to the private sector, and which has the added effect of taking (interest) income out of the private sector (which is then remitted to the US treasury by the Fed). You could say that QE is, in fact, more contractionary than expansionary.



Warren Bird
December 02, 2013

Of course you could accept the fact that rising yields produce higher returns and just relax. I've been writing and speaking for 20 years about the misplaced fear of rising bond yields. It's a simple message: fixed interest investing is all about the interest you earn. As yields go up, you get to reinvest income or maturing bonds at those higher yields, which ratchets up your interest earnings. Bond price volatility is just that - volatility. I'll write a longer response in the new Caveat Emptor section later this week.

November 29, 2013

Do long dated inflation linked bonds help the investor in a rising interest rate environment?

(Editor comment: Thanks, Doug. We will ask a product expert to respond and include it in our new 'Caveat Emptor?' section. Thanks to everyone for the many great questions received on


Leave a Comment:



Red pill or blue pill? Navigating the matrix of fixed income

Inflation? Nothing (much) to see here

Interest rate duration: how exposed are you?


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.