Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 306

Cuffelinks Firstlinks Edition 306

Welcome to the Firstlinks Newsletter Edition 306
Graham Hand

Graham Hand


We start our final election coverage with a reprise of Mark Ellem's article explaining the differences in investing and superannuation policies of the two major parties. Then we move on to fresh insights into Labor's proposals:

* Colin Lewis explains why the extra contributions tax will impact more people than is commonly understood. Do you know how to calculate the cost?

* Tony Dillon says members in pension phase should not assume the trustees of large funds will refund excess franking credits, and he quantifies the impact of the policy on capital gains tax.

* Rodney Brown believes the loss of franking credit refunds may increase corporate tax evasion.

* Finally, we bring together seven strategies to manage the impact of the loss of franking credits.

(There are no new Coalition superannuation policies proposed in the election campaign).

Regardless of whether you are for or against the basic principle of Labor's franking policy, it's a strange outcome when wealthier people are not affected. Trustees with large, diversified SMSF portfolios where the amount in accumulation will always exceed the pension tranche can use the credits to pay tax. I also have a friend who is a tenured university academic with healthy retirement savings held by Unisuper. Their website says: "Based on our current understanding, we expect to continue to use franking credits to offset our income tax liability." 

These people, including myself, are unlikely to be adversely affected, yet Labor's motivation is 'fairness' and a move against 'the top end of town'. Meanwhile, a Centrelink pensioner who established an SMSF in the last year loses the franking refund. It's likely the policy will not survive in its current form in the face of Senate opposition. Expect a minimum allowed refund of say $5,000 to satisfy the cross-benchers, which will dent the number at the top of this list.  

 


When Cuffelinks surveyed its readers on franking credits, over half the 2,000 respondents said they would change investments or super structure if Labor's policy is adopted.

Implementation of these policies has major consequences for the budget as the revenues finance new spending on cancer treatments, child care, dental care and infrastructure. By 2030, franking credit refunds alone are worth $7 billion a year.

If it's correct that industry funds will not be affected, their power will multiply across all sectors. For example, within five years, AustralianSuper expects its funds under management to double to $300 billion, and it will bring more management in-house to reduce its costs.

Moving right along ...

If you're tired of the election coverage (and yes, franking credits), let's check some research on ways to drive better investment outcomes.

Jack Gray and Steven Hall describe 10 'rules of thumb' often used by professionals to help make decisions during uncertain times.

Shane Shepherd explores with David Laibson how investors make irrational decisions, and changing their environment can be more effective than changing their behaviour.

Michael Collins looks at the ethical issues of Artificial Intelligence, or AI. We're only just starting to appreciate the consequences while AI is off and running. We're all being watched.

This week's White Paper below is a review of global ETFs from BetaShares, showing good growth while 'mutual funds' face outflows, and the rising popularity of fixed income ETFs. In Australia, the sector is close to $50 billion, a doubling in only two-and-a-half years.

The 'Additional features' section below carries a wide range of reports on hybrids, ETFs and LICs.

Congratulations to Sydney-based Andy Kuper of Leapfrog Investments, who recently closed the largest ever private equity fund by a dedicated impact fund manager. The $1 billion raising will invest in healthcare and financial services to reach 230 million people in emerging markets.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

  •   17 May 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.