Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 306

Cuffelinks Firstlinks Edition 306

Welcome to the Firstlinks Newsletter Edition 306
Graham Hand

Graham Hand


We start our final election coverage with a reprise of Mark Ellem's article explaining the differences in investing and superannuation policies of the two major parties. Then we move on to fresh insights into Labor's proposals:

* Colin Lewis explains why the extra contributions tax will impact more people than is commonly understood. Do you know how to calculate the cost?

* Tony Dillon says members in pension phase should not assume the trustees of large funds will refund excess franking credits, and he quantifies the impact of the policy on capital gains tax.

* Rodney Brown believes the loss of franking credit refunds may increase corporate tax evasion.

* Finally, we bring together seven strategies to manage the impact of the loss of franking credits.

(There are no new Coalition superannuation policies proposed in the election campaign).

Regardless of whether you are for or against the basic principle of Labor's franking policy, it's a strange outcome when wealthier people are not affected. Trustees with large, diversified SMSF portfolios where the amount in accumulation will always exceed the pension tranche can use the credits to pay tax. I also have a friend who is a tenured university academic with healthy retirement savings held by Unisuper. Their website says: "Based on our current understanding, we expect to continue to use franking credits to offset our income tax liability." 

These people, including myself, are unlikely to be adversely affected, yet Labor's motivation is 'fairness' and a move against 'the top end of town'. Meanwhile, a Centrelink pensioner who established an SMSF in the last year loses the franking refund. It's likely the policy will not survive in its current form in the face of Senate opposition. Expect a minimum allowed refund of say $5,000 to satisfy the cross-benchers, which will dent the number at the top of this list.  

 


When Cuffelinks surveyed its readers on franking credits, over half the 2,000 respondents said they would change investments or super structure if Labor's policy is adopted.

Implementation of these policies has major consequences for the budget as the revenues finance new spending on cancer treatments, child care, dental care and infrastructure. By 2030, franking credit refunds alone are worth $7 billion a year.

If it's correct that industry funds will not be affected, their power will multiply across all sectors. For example, within five years, AustralianSuper expects its funds under management to double to $300 billion, and it will bring more management in-house to reduce its costs.

Moving right along ...

If you're tired of the election coverage (and yes, franking credits), let's check some research on ways to drive better investment outcomes.

Jack Gray and Steven Hall describe 10 'rules of thumb' often used by professionals to help make decisions during uncertain times.

Shane Shepherd explores with David Laibson how investors make irrational decisions, and changing their environment can be more effective than changing their behaviour.

Michael Collins looks at the ethical issues of Artificial Intelligence, or AI. We're only just starting to appreciate the consequences while AI is off and running. We're all being watched.

This week's White Paper below is a review of global ETFs from BetaShares, showing good growth while 'mutual funds' face outflows, and the rising popularity of fixed income ETFs. In Australia, the sector is close to $50 billion, a doubling in only two-and-a-half years.

The 'Additional features' section below carries a wide range of reports on hybrids, ETFs and LICs.

Congratulations to Sydney-based Andy Kuper of Leapfrog Investments, who recently closed the largest ever private equity fund by a dedicated impact fund manager. The $1 billion raising will invest in healthcare and financial services to reach 230 million people in emerging markets.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

  •   17 May 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.