Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 129

Electing for a pension payment to be taxed as a lump sum

It is important to understand the different tax treatment of ‘superannuation income streams’ and ‘superannuation lump sums’. Whilst in most instances, the tax free component will be received tax free whether a lump sum or income stream, the treatment of the taxable component can vary greatly. It is often advantageous for this component to be taxed as a lump sum.

Accessing $195,000 tax free before age 60

For those pension recipients at least 60 years of age at the time of the pension payment, there will be no tax applicable, irrespective of the components. However, those aged between preservation age and 59, the taxable component, if taxed as a ‘superannuation income stream’, will be taxed at their marginal tax rate (MTR), plus Medicare Levy, less a 15% tax offset.

In contrast, those aged between preservation age and 59, if they have satisfied a relevant condition of release, can receive the first $195,000 of the taxable component as a lump sum tax free.

A payment made from a pension can be treated as a lump sum for income tax purposes. Under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and associated regulations, payments from superannuation are defined as follows:

  • Superannuation lump sums (taxed using the low rate cap/maximum rate of 17% (above the low rate cap) for those between 56 and 60), and
  • Superannuation income stream benefits (taxed at normal marginal rates less the 15% tax offset for those between 56 and 60).

The default position is that any payment from a superannuation income stream is a pension. Regulation 995-1.03 of the Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 (ITAR 1997), however, states that a payment is not a superannuation income stream benefit if it comes from an income stream that allows flexible payments and the person to whom the payment is made elects, before a payment is made, for that payment not to be treated as a superannuation income stream benefit. Any payment not considered a superannuation income stream benefit is by default a superannuation lump sum (s307-65 ITAA (1997)).

Therefore, a payment can be treated as a lump sum and taxed as such. An important requirement is this election must be made prior to the payment being made. An election made after the date of the payment will not be valid and the benefit will be treated as a superannuation income stream.

The superannuation legislation implications

From a superannuation perspective (SIS Regulations), the payment will be considered a partial commutation of the income stream, but counts against the minimum pension requirements set out in the SIS Regulations. For clients under the age of 60, it is possible to use this interpretation to provide a lower rate of tax when compared with the benefit being taxed as an income stream (or even zero tax).

Of crucial importance is the taxpayer must have satisfied a condition of release, making their benefit in the SMSF Unrestricted Non-Preserved. Such a condition of release would be retirement on or after preservation age. This then begs the question – can this strategy be used for a Transition to Retirement Income Stream (TRIS)?

The answer to this question is yes, provided the TRIS pension has Unrestricted Non-Preserved benefits at least equivalent to the amount of the partial commutation. Many TRIS pensions are usually commenced with benefits that are Preserved; which means they can only be cashed as a lump sum (partial commutation) when the member satisfies a condition of release with a nil cashing restriction.

Let’s look at an example

Sandy is 56 and is looking to start a TRIS pension. She has a member balance in her SMSF of $600,000, all a taxable component. She has an Unrestricted Non-Preserved benefit of $105,000 and she has not used any of her low rate taxable threshold. If Sandy draws the minimum amount from her TRIS pension (4% or $24,000), how much tax does she have to pay?

The table below illustrates the outcome if the benefit is taxed as an income stream at various marginal tax rates, or taxed as a lump sum (this applies to the taxable component only).

*In Sandy’s case no tax is payable, as she has not used any of her low cap taxable threshold.

As can be seen from the table above, if an income stream benefit can be taxed as a lump sum, the tax savings can be significant, especially if the low cap taxable threshold is available. In fact, as Sandy has not used any of the $195,000 cap, she can draw the full $105,000 Unrestricted Non-Preserved benefit from the fund and pay no tax.

Financial planning opportunities

This creates the following opportunities for Sandy:

  • The $105,000 taxable component withdrawn as a pension but taxed as a lump sum can be re-contributed to the SMSF as a non-concessional contribution. Sandy has turned $105,000 taxable component to $105,000 tax free. This would then preclude the 17% lump sum tax payable if these funds were to be paid to independent adult children on Sandy’s death.
  • Sandy could reduce her overall tax by increasing her salary sacrifice contributions to superannuation, replacing her wage taxed at her marginal tax rate with tax free pension payments. The salary sacrifice contributions are only subject to the 15% concessional contributions tax.
  • The assets in the fund used to pay the pension will become exempt from tax. This could be considerable if the fund realises assets held for a significant period of time to help fund the pension payments.
  • The $105,000 re-contributed as a non-concessional contribution could be quarantined into a second 100% tax free pension, where all earnings will also be considered a tax free component. This could provide valuable tax savings if the benefit was paid to independent adult children on Sandy’s death.

Issues to watch with this strategy

Special care is needed with this strategy:

  • To have the benefit not treated as a superannuation income stream benefit, the election must be made before the payment.
  • The election is only effective whilst the income stream is in place. If the income stream is fully commuted to a lump sum, the payment will not count towards the minimum pension requirements.
  • There was some confusion as to whether this strategy applied to TRIS pensions, but the ATO has clarified the view that a member can make the election but only if they have an Unrestricted Non-Preserved benefit in their account.
  • The payment will be considered a partial commutation of the pension, so any Unrestricted-Non Preserved benefit in the member account will need to be at least the value of the payment made.
  • The account balance of the TRIS pension account immediately after the partial commutation must be greater than or equal to the remaining required minimum payment for that financial year (less pension payments already made) for the lump sum to be counted against the minimum pension standards.

Whilst this strategy has some distinct advantages, it is important clients seek advice with regard to their own personal circumstances. For example, it may be of benefit to only apply the Preserved benefit in the member account to the TRIS pension, leaving the Unrestricted Non-Preserved benefit to be maintained for other purposes (such as an account based pension or lump sum). It is also important the fund’s governing rules provide flexibility with regard to pension payments (such as the ability to make an 'in-specie' lump sum from a TRIS).

 

Nicholas Ali is Head of Technical Services & Education at SuperIQ and SuperConcepts. The strategies described in this article are complex and should only be attempted using professional advisers with the requisite skills. It is accurate at the time of writing but rules or interpretations may change.

For more articles and papers from SuperConcepts, a sponsor of Firstlinks, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Are you paying tax by not starting a super pension?

Are death bed benefit super withdrawals effective?

Applying CGT relief for SMSFs and TTR pensions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.