Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 276

ETFs a boon, but watch the tax treatment

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) have been a boon globally for self-directed investors, offering access to a basket of underlying investments, conveniently rolled-up into one security that trades like a stock. They’re listed on public exchanges and require small minimum investments. Launched in 1993, their popularity has soared with total assets globally scraping the US$3.5 trillion mark at the end of 2017.

Australian growth has been rapid

In fact, in 2018, 21% of investors tracking their SMSFs on Sharesight bought or sold an ETF*. This is a significant increase on just 3% in 2008.

Nowadays there’s an ETF for everything: emerging markets, water scarcity, specific sectors and even cryptocurrencies. A colleague owns a cybersecurity ETF (ASX:HACK) that returned 39% in one year. I’ve personally owned ETFs that track commodity futures and one that shorted the real estate market.

But with this expanded investment menu of ready-access ETFs, Australian self-directed investors face complex realities. Despite all the positive aspects of ETFs, they can be a tax nightmare for Australian investors who’ve chosen to go off-platform or not rely on a managed service.

ETF tax in Australia

For Australian investors, ETFs create tax complications because instead of classifying them as ordinary company shares, the ATO classifies ETFs as trusts. To make things more convoluted, in 2016 the ATO changed the rules around investment trusts by creating the Attribution Managed Investment Trust (AMIT) regime.

Since the vast majority of ETFs make distributions (even those that are growth focused), investors face complex annual taxation statements. If you own an ETF and you don't know what I’m talking about, chances are your accountant or administrator is sorting it out for you.

An example of the ETF tax treatment

In our research, one purchase of Vanguard Australian Shares (ASX:VAS), which paid just four dividends throughout the year, morphed into 17 distribution and two capital gains components on the annual taxation statement. In turn these correspond to 10 items on an individual tax return, giving much complexity for just one buy.

Source: VAS annual tax statement. Click to enlarge.

Why does this happen? VAS invests mostly in ASX shares, whose companies in turn pay dividends, are subject to franking credits and undergo corporate actions. This creates different tax implications. VAS also invests in unlisted securities, derivatives and overseas companies each with their own tax nuances.

When a fund manager runs a large portfolio, they leave room at the margins for inflows, outflows, rebalancing and hedging. It’s impossible for a portfolio manager to be 100% exposed to their core mandate at all times. Portfolios change daily, which means the underlying components of each distribution will be different quarter to quarter as corporate actions occur, or the portfolio turns over. This activity affects your annual tax situation.

As time goes by, you receive VAS distributions in cash (usually quarterly or half yearly), along with a simple statement from the registry showing the net payment. At the end of the year, the registry will send you a final statement.

These final statements contain all of the component and subcomponent information and are far more detailed than what you received during the year. This information can retroactively modify your cost base and taxable dividend income, making your tax lodgement difficult. It runs the risk that investors will pay more tax than they need to.

How Fintech is easing the ETF tax problem

Fintechs like Sharesight have created the expectation for real-time investment information. Once-per-year investment statements are no longer good enough for investors seeking accurate performance data about their hard-earned investment portfolios.

Case in point: in order to provide accurate performance and tax reporting for our clients, we sought to improve the depth and accuracy of ETFs’ distribution data for our self-directed clients and partners.

We knew this would be a big undertaking, but it proved more difficult than anticipated. After beginning our journey, we realised there was a lack of information and no clear rules available to investors. No one at the ASX, the ETF providers, professional firms, or even the share registries held the answer — but all recognised the problem.

Ideally, we thought we’d license the detailed distribution data from the registries or ETF managers on an ongoing basis. This proved impossible because they don’t calculate the data as the tax year progresses. It’s just one opaque process at year-end.

Fortunately, Computershare came to the party and agreed to provide us with the detailed information for some of the most popular ETFs as soon as the financial year ended. We use this data as a basis for calculating the distribution components for the 2017 and 2018 Australian financial years.

Unfortunately, not all the registries were able to provide data for their ETFs. We have no idea how it can be that a registry can send personalised taxation statements out to millions of Australians but not be able to provide even notional data to software companies like Sharesight. In some cases, we did receive sample data, but not always in a useable format.

After months of hard work, tracking down the right people at Computershare, and even buying ETFs ourselves in a Sharesight company account just to get the statements, we managed to build a solution that simplifies ETF tax administration for self-directed investors. After months of research we could not find clear answers from the industry, so we believe our feature hits the mark in terms of both accuracy and usability. Hopefully, it will push the industry towards better reporting standards.

ETFs remain terrific investment options

ETFs have helped democratise investing. I use them myself for long- and short-term investing and we support other fintechs who use them as building blocks for their clients’ portfolios. However, it seems that the zest to market new ‘easy’ ETF investment products wasn’t matched by an ease in tax administration.

The reality is that all investments have a tax implication of some kind. For example, ASX-listed stocks are vulnerable to future franking credit decisions. Tax complexity is just a new piece of the puzzle investors must keep in mind when building and administering their portfolios.

 

Doug Morris is the CEO of Sharesight, an investment portfolio tracker that provides reliable tax and performance reporting to self-directed investors and financial professionals. Sharesight is an alliance partner of Cuffelinks.

Important Disclaimer. We do not provide tax or investment advice. The buying of shares can be complex and varies per individual. You should seek tax and investment advice specific to your situation before acting on any of the information in this article.

 

7 Comments
Peter T
October 23, 2018

Well done Sharesight in tackling this challenge of bringing transparency and greater accuracy to ETF tax reporting. With the traded volume of ETFs growing so rapidly, this issue affects a large number of investors (whether they know it or they don't). And they don't all want to be paying away fees for accountants to be doing it for them.

I note your observation that "not all the registries were able to provide data for their ETFs" - surely the ETF providers themselves (the Vanguards, iShares, etc.) should be leaning on their chosen registries to lift their game?

Doug Sharesight
October 23, 2018

Thanks Peter

Albert Uo
October 21, 2018

the more complex it appears the more likely you are to seek professional help. complexity is good for (some ) businesses.

Doug Sharesight
October 23, 2018

Perhaps true Albert, but our aim at Sharesight is to mitigate this need and hopefully bring down the cost for investors. Some complexity can be simplified with technology, some cannot.

Adrian
October 18, 2018

Yes and vanguard prefilled the numbers into my tax so it was pretty simple to cross check and click ok. The cost base tracking is a simple spreadsheet job, or a piece of paper will do it too. No different to an unlisted managed fund.

Doug Sharesight
October 23, 2018

Based on our client feedback, it would seem that not all investors are willing to do this on a spreadsheet themselves and (perhaps more important) don't have access to per unit distribution data with enough detail to back fill a spreadsheet. Not to mention how to factor in DRPs.

Interestingly in our research multiple investments in the same ETF held over similar periods produced different component break downs.

Some investors love spreadsheets, some don't!

SH
October 18, 2018

where do you get 17 components and 10 tax return items from? I can see 13 labels of which 8 are non-zero in the sample statement. plus there is the cost base possible increase or reduction.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Caveat Emptor: LICs versus ETFs

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Three retirement checks for when you have enough

Not every retiree needs to gun for higher returns, but a conservative portfolio can court its own risks, especially with bond rates so low. But some retirees prefer to settle for a lower income.

How the age pension helps retirees cope with losses

It's often overlooked how wealthier couples can fall back on the age pension if a market loss hits their portfolio. The reassurance is never greater than in a financial (and now epidemic) crisis.

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

Interview Series: Why it’s gold’s time to shine

With gold now on the radar of individual investors, SMSFs and institutions, here's what you need to know about the choices between gold bars, gold ETFs and even gold miners, with Jordan Eliseo. 

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 377

The most significant change in asset allocation by Australian investors in recent years has been the move into global equities. It's been a canny trade for those who focussed on the US, especially great companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Google. International equities experienced net inflows into ETFs of $722 million in August 2020 versus only $181 million for Australian equities. 

  • 30 September 2020
Superannuation

The elusive 12%: is superannuation at a turning point?

Such is the concern among unions and Labor about Government plans to undermine superannuation that an 'Emergency Summit' was called this week, and pioneer Bill Kelty evoked a social commitment.

Interviews

My lessons from five decades of investing

As she retires after 47 years of investing, Claudia Huntington explains the art rather than the science of the trade, the value of a great leader and culture, and the insights she gives to new colleagues.

SMSF strategies

The impact of our marriage breakdown on our SMSF

Even if a marriage ends amicably, there are complications when partners share an SMSF. You can't simply 'split' the assets on a handshake, and who takes the capital gains and what's the impact on an estate?

Investment strategies

The future is always clearest once it is in the past

It's one of those times when a case can be made that the market is expensive on some measures, but reasonable on others. Better to do what the great companies do: instead of guessing the future, they create it.

Investment strategies

Emerging markets: Should I stay or should I go?

For long-term investors, the most important factor driving returns is the price paid to acquire a stock. Emerging Markets stocks exhibit favourable valuations on both an absolute and relative basis.

Superannuation

20k now or 50k later? What’s driving decisions to withdraw super?

The amount of retirement savings withdrawn under the Superannuation Early Release Scheme has surprised many. This comprehensive survey of thousands of members of Cbus explains their motivations.

Economy

The surprising resilience of residential housing and retail

With a pandemic, a recession and high unemployment, there's every reason to expect residential property and retail sales to be collapsing. But data shows both are resilient, so what is happening?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.