Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 77

Why the FSI should interest SMSF members

Everyone with an SMSF should be taking an interest in David Murray’s Financial System Inquiry (FSI) because it asks some fundamental questions, like should there be any limitations on the establishment of SMSFs? And it makes some interesting observations, such as: The majority of superannuation tax concessions go to the top 20% of income earners.

Tax breaks and tax payments

Let’s start with this one.

It’s true that the majority of super tax breaks go to the top income earners. The FSI’s Interim Report has a chart showing the top 20% of earners receive 56% of the superannuation tax breaks. But that’s only half the picture. The report should also include another chart, based on ATO data, that would show the top 20% of earners pay 63% of all income tax collected. So, in fact, the top earners are more than paying for the super tax breaks they receive.

It’s important for policy makers, and those advising them, to look at the whole picture and not be swayed by the emotional arguments of people who see the world in simplistic terms like rich versus poor, terms which tend to be defined by individual perspective and ideology.

The Interim Report also notes that a small number of accounts (12%) hold a high proportion (60%) of superannuation assets. They are talking about SMSFs and the picture is hardly surprising. On average, SMSFs have much higher account balances than retail or industry funds. SMSF members tend to have higher incomes than members of managed funds and so are able to make larger compulsory and voluntary contributions. Many also make non-concessional contributions, while others have been able to transfer assets, such as business property, into their SMSFs.

Some commentators think that’s unfair and that SMSFs with high balances should be heavily taxed. They believe everyone should have a standard pension and pay tax on their retirement income. That may be how it is done in some other countries, but it’s not the way the retirement incomes system has been set up in Australia over the past two decades.

Superannuation drives many economic and social benefits

Superannuation helps Australians to save enough to support themselves financially throughout their years in retirement and into old age and to be independent of taxpayer-funded pensions. It is not a mechanism for the redistribution of wealth. That is achieved via the income tax and welfare payment systems.

The Government provides tax incentives to encourage people to save for retirement through the compulsory Superannuation Guarantee levy and via voluntary contributions up to set limits. The incentives are economically sensible, returning a dividend in the form of lower public pension costs in the future. Our research shows that the basic tax break given on the SG levy will be repaid three times over in reduced age pension costs.

Other economic and social benefits include creating a large pool of capital to be invested in the productive economy and giving people the security of knowing that they will be able to live decently in retirement and old age. As the Treasurer noted at the time of the last budget, only 20% of Australians are self-sufficient and 80% rely on some level of taxpayer support and this would still be the situation in 2050. Indeed many Australians don’t pay any net tax.

Superannuation gives people an opportunity to lift themselves out of a state of dependency on other taxpayers and super tax incentives, particularly voluntary contributions above the SG rate, encourage and enable them to do that.

Of course, there is some immediate cost to the budget, but there are some offsets. If the super tax breaks are removed or reduced, less money will flow into super and more people will ultimately have to rely on the pension. If the flow of money into super is reduced, the tax collected from fund earnings will be reduced. And people will use other tax effective ways, such as negative gearing, to invest.

We are not saying the present superannuation system is perfect – far from it. It is falling short of the objective of enabling most Australians to be financially independent in retirement, though the gap will be reduced if people work longer before retiring.

More flexible contribution caps

One change that should be made is to move towards a more flexible regime on contributions with the overall limit averaged over a cycle or maybe over a whole working life so people can pump more money into superannuation when they are able to do so. Many people don’t have the capacity to turbo charge their super savings until they have paid off their house and educated their children. A more flexible system would help people with broken work patterns, such as women taking time off to raise a family.

Another significant structural change may be to move, over time, from the current TTE system (tax on contributions and earnings but not on retirement pensions) to an EET system (no tax on contributions and earnings but pension income is taxed) as applies in other countries.

These are big policy questions that need to be tackled in a far-sighted and clear-headed way. When change is made, it must be implemented carefully, without haste and without disadvantage to people who have saved and planned their retirement under the existing rules. If there’s one thing that damages confidence in the superannuation system, it’s unexpected, arbitrary and piecemeal changes to the rules, particularly to taxation. This may be driven by governments’ need for revenue because they haven’t managed the budget well or in response to emotive arguments about fairness. These issues are no doubt near the top of the list for David Murray and his Inquiry.

 

Duncan Fairweather is Executive Director of the SMSF Owners’ Alliance (SMSFOA), which was set up to provide a voice for the one million Australians who are trustees of their own super funds. SMSFOA is a member of the ATO’s Consultation Hub and ASIC’s Consumer Advisory Panel.

The Editor of Cuffelinks, Graham Hand, will be presenting on SMSF Portfolio Construction at an SMSFOA Workshop on 9 October 2014. 

3 Comments
Graeme
August 30, 2014

“I shudder to think what our national savings rate would be without the Superannuation tax environment.”

That raises an interesting theoretical question. What if all the varying investment tax incentives were removed? Obviously chaos in the short to medium term, but what would actually happen in the long term? Probably as much a question for the psychologists as for the economists.

If you’re well off, would you buy more expensive ‘toys’ and take more overseas trips? Or would you simply continue to invest in the same underlying assets and securities. Perhaps a ‘level playing field’ would improve investment efficiency?

At the other end of the income scale, does compulsory super divert consumption spending to saving? Or does it effectively mean it takes longer to both save for a deposit and then pay off your home loan? May this actually reduce saving over a life time? Or is it a transfer of wealth from bank customers to bank shareholders, with no net savings change

The mind boggles.

Graeme
August 29, 2014

I’m not convinced of the validity of the argument that 20% of earners pay 63% of all income tax collected justifies the current superannuation tax breaks. Firstly, although I don’t have the figures, I would suspect that the top 20% of earners probably earn around 63% of all income anyway. Furthermore, as we supposedly live in a civilised society, might it not be fairer to compare what tax is paid on income after essential living costs have been taken out?

For instance, someone on $70,000 will pay (incl. medicare) $15,333 tax. If essential living expenses are $50,000, then their ‘real’ tax rate is $15,333 divided by $20,000 which equals 76%. If you’re on $170,000 tax is $53,883, so your ‘real’ tax rate is $53,883 divided by $120,000 which equals 45%. Hardly justifies better tax breaks for the latter. Sure it’s simplistic, but it just shows how you can selectively choose figures to prove any position you want.

I also have problem with the justification that reducing super tax breaks will drive more people into negative gearing. Some would say the solution for that is obvious! Hopefully the FSI will live up to its title and treat the system as a whole.

Jon B
August 29, 2014

Someone once made an observation about "lies, damn lies and statistics".

I suspect the hard core Treasury Superannuation skeptics are thinking of better ways of presenting the data in the most negative way possible.

I shudder to think what our national savings rate would be without the Superannuation tax environment.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Bring on the Council of Superannuation Custodians

How a sidecar can keep super motoring along

Minister Jane Hume on SMSFs and superannuation reform

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How to manage the run down in your income in retirement

The first of five articles on modern retirement income products that aim for an increasing pension that lasts for life and on average should not decline in real terms. They are not silver bullets but worth a look.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require trustees - even SMSFs - to offer a retirement income product to protect longevity risk.

Superannuation

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.

Retirement

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.