Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 178

Five types of smart beta ETFs on the ASX

Do you prefer regular or smart investing? Smart, of course, which is why fund marketers invent catchy names for investment products. ‘Smart beta’ is one such product category.

Smart beta ETFs are not new. Globally, there were 1,123 smart beta ETFs as at 30 June 2016. In Australia, there are 154 ETFs and 21 are known as smart beta, accounting for about $1.4 billion or 8.4% of the market, up 20% from a year earlier.

Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, September 2016

What are smart beta ETFs?

Smart beta is a name given to investment strategies that aim to either enhance returns or reduce risks of the existing traditional market-capitalisation-weighted indices – the most referenced one in Australia is the S&P/ASX 200. One of the simplest examples of a smart beta version of the ASX 200 is the equal-weighted version. As the name suggests, this strategy invests 1/200th in each stock on the index. Smart beta strategies differ from active strategies in that:

  • they are rules based
  • they are transparent (we know what the rules are)
  • they are typically low cost when compared with actively managed funds.

Most of these strategies aim to exploit a weakness in a market-cap index and fundamental to their investment philosophy is ‘just because a company is big doesn’t mean you should own a lot of it’. It is common to see so-called ‘factor’ ETFs – smart beta ETFs that increase the weight of smaller companies relative to larger companies or value, momentum, quality or any of the other common factors that are known to perform over time.

Main types of smart beta ETFs

There are five main types of smart beta ETFs currently available in the Australian market, with more types expected to follow:

  • Dividend screened – as the name suggests, this one seeks higher-income stocks and is currently the most popular of the smart beta ETFs available. This trend is occurring globally as yields on fixed income products fail to meet investors’ income demands.
  • Fundamental – this one typically weights or positions each stock based on company fundamentals derived from balance sheets/cashflow statements and profit/loss statements.
  • Quality – weights are determined according to the quality of each stock’s earnings.
  • Equal weighted – the name says it all.
  • Minimum variance or volatility – these are designed to exhibit lower price variability than the market capitalisation index.

Dividend seeking investment strategies are extremely popular globally

Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Fees for the smart beta products are usually cheaper than active management but dearer than the traditional market-capitalisation indexes, as shown below.

Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, September 2016

The relative performance of smart beta-style ETFs that are rules-based investment strategies are often tied to the investment cycle. For example, those based on value or fundamental factors can underperform the market-capitalisation-weighted index for a period of time – such is the nature of value investing. Likewise, those screening for dividends also will have periods where they will underperform the market. The chart below shows periods where smart beta strategies can overshoot to the downside as well as the upside.

Source: Factset, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Rules-based funds, such as smart beta funds offered on the ASX, straddle the spectrum between active and passive investment management. Like active funds there is the possibility of outperformance, but also underperformance when the ‘rules’ are not favoured by prevailing market conditions. However, compared to their passively managed peers, net of fees beating the market is still possible. Smart beta strategies offer access to a form of active management without the need to filter through the vast array of mixed-performing stock pickers.


Leah Kelly is a Portfolio Manager at Owners Advisory. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.



Thematic ETFs: is the juice worth the squeeze?

Know your fund types and structures – an acronym odyssey

ETFs are the Marvel of listed galaxies, even with star WAR


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.