Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 178

Five types of smart beta ETFs on the ASX

Do you prefer regular or smart investing? Smart, of course, which is why fund marketers invent catchy names for investment products. ‘Smart beta’ is one such product category.

Smart beta ETFs are not new. Globally, there were 1,123 smart beta ETFs as at 30 June 2016. In Australia, there are 154 ETFs and 21 are known as smart beta, accounting for about $1.4 billion or 8.4% of the market, up 20% from a year earlier.


Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, September 2016

What are smart beta ETFs?

Smart beta is a name given to investment strategies that aim to either enhance returns or reduce risks of the existing traditional market-capitalisation-weighted indices – the most referenced one in Australia is the S&P/ASX 200. One of the simplest examples of a smart beta version of the ASX 200 is the equal-weighted version. As the name suggests, this strategy invests 1/200th in each stock on the index. Smart beta strategies differ from active strategies in that:

  • they are rules based
  • they are transparent (we know what the rules are)
  • they are typically low cost when compared with actively managed funds.

Most of these strategies aim to exploit a weakness in a market-cap index and fundamental to their investment philosophy is ‘just because a company is big doesn’t mean you should own a lot of it’. It is common to see so-called ‘factor’ ETFs – smart beta ETFs that increase the weight of smaller companies relative to larger companies or value, momentum, quality or any of the other common factors that are known to perform over time.

Main types of smart beta ETFs

There are five main types of smart beta ETFs currently available in the Australian market, with more types expected to follow:

  • Dividend screened – as the name suggests, this one seeks higher-income stocks and is currently the most popular of the smart beta ETFs available. This trend is occurring globally as yields on fixed income products fail to meet investors’ income demands.
  • Fundamental – this one typically weights or positions each stock based on company fundamentals derived from balance sheets/cashflow statements and profit/loss statements.
  • Quality – weights are determined according to the quality of each stock’s earnings.
  • Equal weighted – the name says it all.
  • Minimum variance or volatility – these are designed to exhibit lower price variability than the market capitalisation index.

Dividend seeking investment strategies are extremely popular globally


Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Fees for the smart beta products are usually cheaper than active management but dearer than the traditional market-capitalisation indexes, as shown below.


Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, September 2016

The relative performance of smart beta-style ETFs that are rules-based investment strategies are often tied to the investment cycle. For example, those based on value or fundamental factors can underperform the market-capitalisation-weighted index for a period of time – such is the nature of value investing. Likewise, those screening for dividends also will have periods where they will underperform the market. The chart below shows periods where smart beta strategies can overshoot to the downside as well as the upside.


Source: Factset, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Rules-based funds, such as smart beta funds offered on the ASX, straddle the spectrum between active and passive investment management. Like active funds there is the possibility of outperformance, but also underperformance when the ‘rules’ are not favoured by prevailing market conditions. However, compared to their passively managed peers, net of fees beating the market is still possible. Smart beta strategies offer access to a form of active management without the need to filter through the vast array of mixed-performing stock pickers.

 

Leah Kelly is a Portfolio Manager at Owners Advisory. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   20 October 2016
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

It pays to look under the hood of ETFs

What is smart beta and why is it growing in popularity?

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.