Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 247

What is happening with LIC dividends?

For investors in managed investments, it is important to focus on the total returns achieved. We use two measures of performance for listed managed investments (or listed investment companies, LICs). They are the ‘share price return’, which reflects movements in the share or unit price of the LIC, plus dividends, and the ‘NTA return’ which measures movements in the NTA after tax but before tax on unrealised gains. We generally refer to this as ‘pre-tax NTA plus dividends’. We prefer this measure as we believe it gives a better indication of the underlying portfolio performance after allowing for cash taxes paid, expenses, and manager fees. These returns can be directly influenced by the manager, whereas managers have limited control over the share price movement.

However, we do recognise that many investors in LICs are looking for attractive, stable and steadily growing, dividends or distributions. In this case, it is important to focus on the profits generated by LICs, as dividends can only be paid out of profits and profit reserves. In this report, we look at how the LIC sector fared in the latest reporting season. We also review the LICs under our coverage that offer the highest dividend yields and assess the sustainability of those dividends.

During the recent reporting season, 21 of the 29 LICs we cover that reported results for the six months to 31 December 2017 increased their profits over the prior comparable period. This reflected growth in income from their underlying portfolios, including higher dividend income and capital appreciation.

LIC dividends remain attractive

The solid profit reporting season was positive for dividends, with no LICs reducing dividends. Of those paying dividends for the half, 16 increased dividends, albeit some were very modest increases, and 10 held dividends steady. Four of the five largest LICs increased dividends with AFI the only one to hold its dividend steady. The sector continues to offer attractive yields with the five largest LICs offering an average yield of 4%, broadly in line with the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries yield of 4.1%. Dividends from the top five are fully franked, whereas the average franking of the All Ordinaries is lower.

In the table above, we have shown the 10 highest yielding LICs in our coverage universe. We have based our calculations on the last 12 months dividends payments. We have included special dividends only if we believe they are paid regularly. In order to be able to pay dividends, LICs need to generate profits. However, it is possible for LICs to pay out more than they generate in profits in a given year by dipping into retained profit or dividend reserves from prior years. LICs can smooth dividend payments to their shareholders by retaining profits rather than simply paying out 100% of earnings each year.

The table above shows our estimates (based on published accounts at 31 December 2017) of the number of years each LIC could retain its current dividend payments without generating any additional profits. We think this is a good indicator of dividend sustainability when markets turn down. Coverage of one means that a LIC could maintain its current dividend payout for one year without generating any profit in the current year. The five largest LICs (not shown in the table above) all have coverage of at least two years, except BKI which has coverage of one year. This means they are well-placed to maintain dividends at current levels unless the markets experience a sharp and prolonged downturn.

Pengana has the highest dividend cover

Pengana International Equities (ASX:PIA) maintains the highest dividend reserves coverage level at six years, which should continue to support its high payout levels. However, we note that given it invests in global shares, maintenance of franking at 100% will depend on its ability to continue to generate sufficient realised profits (on which it pays Australian tax) from its portfolio.

Resources recovery boosts Westoz profit reserves

Westoz Investment Company (ASX:WIC) has significantly increased its dividend coverage over the past six months given strong returns from its portfolio which has benefited from exposure to the rebound in resources. Coverage has increased from 3.3 years to 5.8 years meaning it is well placed to maintain its current dividend of six cents per share. However investors should remain mindful of the fact that, with the portfolio exposed to the West Australian resources driven economy, returns and earnings can be volatile. The board is targeting a dividend of six cents per share for FY2018.

WAM Research maintains strong cover and WAM Active increases cover

WAM Research (ASX:WAX) continues to maintain strong dividend reserve cover at 3.8 years and Perpetual Investment Company (ASX:PIC) has built up strong coverage in its short period since listing. Cadence Capital (ASX:CDM) has managed to increase its reserve cover from one to two years over the past six months.

We note that WAM Active (ASX:WAA), which was forced to significantly cut its dividends in 2015 after becoming too aggressive with it payouts, has rebuilt its dividend cover to a slightly more comfortable level of 1.8 years. This should be able to support its current approach of steadily and progressively increasing its dividend in the absence of weaker market conditions.

Highest yielding LICs have lowest reserve cover

It is worth noting that the two highest yielding LICs, Contango Income Generator (ASX:CIE) and WAM Capital (ASX:WAM) also have the lowest coverage. Provided markets continue to perform reasonably well, we do not see an immediate threat to the dividends from these LICs. However, in a material and sustained downturn, when it is more difficult to generate portfolio gains, dividends would most likely come under pressure.

Continue to focus on total return

We encourage investors to focus on LIC total portfolio returns, not just dividends, and before investing in individual LICs, ensure they meet their individual portfolio needs.

 

Peter Rae is Supervisory Analyst at Independent Investment Research. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   5 April 2018
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

LIC reporting season wrap for 2017

Why LIC discount harvesting is a buy-and-hold decision

Four ways to invest in the same fund and save money

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.