Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 41

Happy 30th, $A float best policy change in post-war era

Australians aged 50 or more would recall the surprise 30 years ago – late on the afternoon of 9 December 1983 – when our mollycoddled dollar was floated.

The float is, in my view, the most significant change affecting the Australian economy - and investor choice - of the past 70 years. And that claim stands tall, even though our exchange rate to the US dollar (94 US cents at time of writing) is close to where it finished (92 US cents) on the first day of the float three decades ago.

Prior to the float, four officials (from the Reserve Bank, Treasury Finance and Prime Minister’s Department) set the daily value of our exchange rate in trade-weighted terms.   Their all-too-predictable moves made a motza for speculators at the expense of taxpayers - and set up capital flows that largely stripped monetary policy of its effectiveness.

In the run up to December 1983, many people pointed to the need for the Australian dollar to more responsive to market forces. But no-one in the market or the media expected Treasurer Paul Keating to go all the way and allow a clean float of the exchange rate. He also announced the end of the tight web of exchange controls, including on Australians wanting to invest overseas, that were introduced as emergency measures in World War II.

The surprise added to the impact of the float. As Paul Kelly wrote in the early 1990s, “The float transformed the economics and politics of Australia. It harnessed the Australian economy to the international market place – its rigours and ruthlessness. It signaled the demise of the old Australia – regulated, protected, introspective.”

In the first 20 years of the float, the Australian dollar largely moved up and down with commodity prices. These days, other influences are also at work, such as interest rate differentials, our sovereign ranking and the strength or weakness of the US dollar against the major currencies.

The floating dollar has significantly reduced the impact on Australia’s economic pulse of swings in the global economy, just like good shock-absorbers on a car smooth a drive along a bumpy road. For example, the sharp fall in our exchange rate during the Asian crises of the late nineties and in the GFC softened the impacts on our economy of those massive disruptions in the economies of our trading partners. And the currency appreciations when world growth accelerated in 2004 and particularly during the recent resource booms helped avoid the over-heating of the economy.

The float has made Australian monetary policy more effective. No longer does the Reserve Bank have to purchase or sell Australian dollars to keep the Australian dollar at the target level (or range) – transactions that would generally lessen the impact of its monetary action. The long run of low inflation, including during the recent mining booms, and the enviable record of also going more than 20 years without serious recession would not have been possible without the float.

Of course, it’s not always been easy sailing. When the Aussie dollar fell to 48 US cents in 2001 and again when it peaked a little above 110 US cents in 2012, the exchange rate moved further than the fundamental influences on the currency would seem to have required. Those extreme levels of the currency caused serious pain in some sectors of the economy. Even now, the Australian dollar is a good deal higher than a lot of people would like it to be – and is defying efforts by the Governor of the Reserve Bank to talk it down.

But what would have happened had we maintained a managed exchange rate? The answer, in part, is that events such as the strong commodity prices and mining boom of recent years would have likely have resulted in a burst of inflation that would also have hurt Australian competitiveness – and created all sorts of problems for most Australians, especially investors.

 

Don Stammer is an adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund, Altius Asset Management, Centric Wealth and Philo Capital. The views are his alone.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Keating versus Hume: where willy-nilly meets obscene

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.