Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 207

High or low price, future returns will be low

The higher the price you pay, the lower your returns. This is a fundamental truth of investing, a law, like gravity, and an impost that cannot be escaped. And yet it is always the case that when future returns are the least attractive, enthusiasm for assets is highest. The dichotomy is best explained by author and economist John Kenneth Galbraith’s definition of a bubble at the beginning of section VII of his 1955 book, The Great Crash 1929:

“At some point in the growth of a boom all aspects of property ownership become irrelevant except for the prospect of an early rise in price. Income from the property, or enjoyment of its use, or even its long run worth is now academic … What is important is that tomorrow or next week market values will rise – as they did yesterday or last week – and a profit can be realised.”

It is when the present value of a future income stream (intrinsic value) is ignored and ‘investing’ is replaced with uninformed speculation about (unjustified) price increases that we should be most concerned.

The conventional understanding of risk is that higher returns require the adoption of higher risks. But when share prices are low, as they were at the bottom of the GFC in late 2008, real risk is relatively low. It’s only the perception of risk that is high.

To complete the circle, I note that Seth Klarman from Baupost Group recently observed:

“When securities prices are high, as they are today, the perception of risk is muted, but the risks to investors are quite elevated.”

Risk today, and why this time is not different

It’s worth putting some numbers around the extent of risks in the market today. While many may respond by suggesting low interest rates justify the numbers, let’s remember that this time is never different. The following chart reveals the S&P/ASX100 is now at its greatest premium, above our intrinsic value estimate, in a decade. This alone suggests that a dose of caution is warranted.

Indicative premium to intrinsic value S&P/ASX100 ex-resources

Source: Montgomery Investment Management Pty Limited

The next chart plots the Cyclically Adjusted Price/Earnings (CAPE) Ratio for the US market, using data from Robert Shiller’s website. This time series goes back to the late 1800s, and being based on 10-year inflation-adjusted trailing average earnings, it removes some cyclical ‘noise’.

Shiller CAPE Ratio S&P500

It also shows a market that looks expensive. Only twice since 1881 has the Shiller CAPE been above the current level; the first time just prior to the Great Depression, and the second time just prior to the Tech Wreck.

What about Jeremy Grantham’s ‘new plateau’ statement?

Jeremy Grantham, of GMO fame, recently looked at the S&P500’s PE ratio and proffered the suggestion that this time is indeed different: “very, very different.” A close examination reveals the appearance of a regime change. Between 1970 and 1997, the PE averaged 13.95, but since 1997 the average PE has been 23.36 with higher highs and higher lows being recorded than the pre-1997 period.

In the Shiller CAPE chart above, prior to 1994, a PE above 20 looked to have been the level at which valuation became a concern, with the market mean-reverting and then trading below that level almost 90% of the time.

Since 1994, however, things have been different. In fact, during the post-1994 period the CAPE has been above 20 times for more than 90% of the time. Even in the depths of the GFC, it did not approach the low points seen regularly during the earlier period, and barely recorded any time below its longer-term average.

Grantham’s regime change suggests that we might have a new average – one drawn from the data since 1994 or 1997 – depending on which version of the PE is used – and one that is much higher than any drawn from taking into account the entire period. Such a conclusion is tantamount to what might be described as a new ‘permanently high plateau’. If that expression sounds familiar, it is because the last person who said it was Yale economist Professor Irving Fisher.

It was October 17, 1929 in the New York Times that Fisher wrote;

“Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau. I do not feel there will be soon, if ever, a 50 or 60 point break from present levels, such as (bears) have predicted. I expect to see the stock market a good deal higher within a few months.”

That was October 17. Black Thursday occurred on October 24, and the market dropped by 11%, followed four days later by Black Monday, when it fell another 13%, and the next day, Black Tuesday, it lost a further 12%.

As an aside, Fisher was back at it again on November 14, 1929 suggesting:

“The end of the decline of the stockmarket will probably not be long, only a few more days at most.”

As we end financial year 2016/2017, where is Australia?

I am not suggesting we are headed for anything like the circumstances during the Great Depression. I am suggesting that current valuations in Australia are not justified by near-term economic conditions, and more importantly, prospects for profit growth. It does not follow that overvaluation is immediately followed by a crash. However, flying in the face of conventional wisdom, it pays to be more cautious because real risks are higher than perceived risks.

Forward P/E ratio, ASX200 excluding banks and resource companies

This chart shows at the end of May 2017, the average PE for the group of Australian companies mapped was 18 times. Worryingly, growth in forecast earnings has contributed just 19% of the appreciation in stock prices over the last five years. Fully 81% of the market’s performance over the last five years has simply been due to PE expansion, that is, investors’ willingness to pay more for the same dollar of profits. If the outlook for longer-term earnings growth has improved materially over the same period, such optimism might be warranted. However, like many of our wealthy and experienced business and entrepreneur clients, we see darker tinges to the clouds forming on the horizon.

The average PE today is 7% higher than at the end of October 2007, the pre-GFC peak. Additionally, there are parallels to that period with global interest rates starting to rise following a period of aggressively accommodative monetary policy, and record high levels of debt in the Australian household sector.

The big difference for Australia this time however is that a slowing China, and contracting investment in resources sector capacity growth, will fail to rescue the Australian economy from any broader economic slowdown.

Prior to the GFC, forecast earnings growth was 10% higher than the prior corresponding period, underpinning the PE ratios investors were willing to pay. Today, not only is the market paying 7% more for each dollar of earnings than it was prior to the GFC, but earnings forecasts are only 3% higher than the same time a year ago.

It follows that caution may well be premature but it is nevertheless well founded because the higher the price you pay, the lower your returns and locking in low returns is in nobody’s interest.


Roger Montgomery is Chairman and Chief Investment Officer at Montgomery Investment Management. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.



Redefining risk for income investors

Should you be a value or growth investor?

Unwinding is warning of late stages of boom


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.


Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.