Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 308

What now for SMSFs and hybrids?

Well, that was unexpected. The election delivered a revolt against Labor's franking credit policy. Prior to the election, we thought there would be little influence on the hybrid market because there was sufficient demand outside the affected investors to soak up the next few years of supply. If and when SMSFs did react to the policy, their biggest issue was their franked equity portfolio. Equity allocations are much larger in most SMSF portfolios.

At time of writing, the bank component of the Elstree Hybrid Index is up around 0.5% compared to the 9% increase in the S&P/ASX200 Bank Index. The hybrid return is only just in the top 5% of two-day returns over the last 10 years. Given that the election outcome was clearly unexpected, it indicates there are not yet a lot of pension SMSF investors returning to the market.

Ignore us and think long term

When it comes to hybrids, investors should consider our short-term guesses as next to useless for the simple reason that we believe hybrids should be a component of most income portfolio. Investors should be insensitive to 1%-2% price movements because of the favourable characteristics hybrids bring to portfolios:

  • Cash rates are going to 1% and term deposit rates will be around 1.5% in a few months.
  • The hybrid return of cash rates +3% or so is close to equity market returns over the long term and equivalent to income returns from high yield bonds or loan funds.
  • Hybrids are not volatile except in big equity market drawdowns. Since the GFC, we’ve seen 20% decreases in equity markets and a maximum 3% drawdown in hybrids.
  • Hybrid return weakness is short term.
  • The risk factors and pattern of returns are uncorrelated to both equities and other income categories. High yield bonds and loan funds are more highly correlated to equities in a statistical and fundamental sense and if (and when) we do get a recession, they are more likely to fall by more than 10%.
  • Hybrids are liquid, with a few exceptions. Other higher-yielding income categories have unproven liquidity and are probably lobster pots (easy to get into, impossible to get out of). In stress, they will trade below their doubtful NAVs.

It's worth understanding Sharpe ratios

We’ll get a bit techie here, but the concept of risk-adjusted return is easy to understand. You want to earn more for investing in risky investments, if only because lots of volatility upsets investors and they sell at the wrong time. The Sharpe ratio measures the extra return for extra risk and is expressed as a ratio. If it is positive, it means that you have received extra return for the extra risk and the more positive the better. In the chart below, we show the Sharpe ratios for the Elstree Enhanced Income Fund (including franking credits but excluding fees) and the All Ords Accumulation Index over the past 10 years. We use the rolling 3-year ratio as a good timeframe over which to judge investments.

So, what does that tell us?

Since the GFC (when hybrid margins rose from the 1% pre GFC to average about 3.5% since), equities have returned 7.7% per annum compared to the Elstree Enhanced Income Fund (EEIF) return of 6.8% p.a. But because hybrids don’t have the annual 10% ups and downs that equities experience, the Fund has a Sharpe ratio of 1, which is twice as good as Australian equities.

Investors considering hybrids should take comfort from the following features:

  • Sustainable returns that aren’t much below prospective equity returns and well above cash.
  • Structurally lower risk than equities, and reasonable prospective risk (although lower than senior debt and subordinated debt in the capital structure).
  • Structurally different risk factors than other non-cash and bond asset classes.

Hydrids can be complex in structure and investors should consider the features of any instrument or fund before committing capital, but at least the threat of a removal of franking credit refunds from SMSFs has been removed.

 

Campbell Dawson and Norman Derham are Executive Directors of Elstree Investment Management, a boutique fixed income fund manager. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual investor.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The fascinating bank hybrid journey of the last year

Let's refocus the active v passive debate

Hybrids: the good, the bad and the ugly

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Super changes, the Budget and 2021 versus 2022

Josh Frydenberg's third budget contained changes to superannuation and other rules but their effective date is expected to be 1 July 2022. Take care not to confuse them with changes due on 1 July 2021.

Noel's share winners and loser plus budget reality check

Among the share success stories is a poor personal experience as Telstra's service needs improving. Plus why the new budget announcements on downsizing and buying a home don't deserve the super hype.

Grantham interview on the coming day of reckoning

Jeremy Grantham has seen it all before, with bubbles every 15 years or so. The higher you go, the longer and greater the fall. You can have a high-priced asset or a high-yielding asset, but not both at the same time.

Whoyagonnacall? 10 unspoken risks buying off-the-plan

All new apartment buildings have defects, and inexperienced owners assume someone else will fix them. But developers and builders will not volunteer to spend time and money unless someone fights them. Part 1

Buffett says stock picking is too hard for most investors

Warren Buffett explained why he believes most investors should not pick stocks but simply own an S&P 500 index fund. "There's a lot more to picking stocks than figuring out what’s going to be a wonderful industry."

Should investors brace for uncomfortably high inflation?

The global recession came quickly and deeply but it has given way to a strong rebound. What are the lessons for investors, how should a portfolio change and what role will inflation play?

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

ETFs are the Marvel of listed galaxies, even with star WAR

Until 2018, LICs and LITs dominated ETFs, much like the Star Wars franchise was the most lucrative in the world until Marvel came along. Now ETFs are double their rivals, just as Marvel conquered Star Wars.

Shares

Four leading tech stocks now look cheap

There are few opportunities to buy tech heavyweights at attractive prices. In Morningstar’s view, four global leaders are trading at decent discounts to their fair values, indicating potential for upside.

Shares

Why copper prices are at all-time highs

Known as Dr Copper for the uncanny way its price anticipates future economic activity, copper has hit all-time highs. What are the forces at play and strategies to benefit from the electric metal’s strength?

Economy

Baby bust: will infertility shape Australia's future?

In 1961, Australian women had 3.5 children on average but by 2018, this figure stood at just 1.7. Falling fertility creates a shift in demographics and the ratio of retirees to working-age people.

SMSF strategies

The Ultimate SMSF EOFY Checklist 2021

The end of FY2021 means rules and regulations to check for members of public super funds and SMSFs. Take advantage of opportunities but also avoid a knock on the door. Here are 25 items to check.

Economy

How long will the bad inflation news last?

The answer to whether the US inflation increase will prove temporary or permanent depends on the rates of growth of the quantity of money. It needs to be brought down to about 0.3% a month, and that's a problem.

Economy

The ‘cosmic’ forces leading the US to Modern Monetary Theory

If the world’s largest economy adopted a true MMT framework, the investment implications would be enormous. Economic growth would be materially greater but inflation and interest rates would also be much higher.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.