Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 106

Income-seekers: these 'myths' could come back to haunt you

It’s late in a decades-long bond rally, and it’s safe to say that the current, ultra-low interest rate environment is messing with our heads.

Who, at the outset of 2014, would have guessed that bonds would put on such a rally? And fewer still predicted that long-term government bonds – deeply unloved by most investors for their extreme sensitivity to interest rate changes – would be one of the best-performing categories, gaining more than 20% in the US in 2013 and 12% in Australia. With interest rates so low, you need to whip out an electron microscope to see the yield on your core bond fund, never mind cash. Low interest rates have left many income-oriented investors scrambling for yield and given rise to a lot of questions. If interest rates rise, where should bond investors go for insulation? Will individual bonds, dividend paying stocks or cash be safer than the core bond funds that so many investors have been counselled to hold?

The answers aren't clear-cut, which in turn leaves plenty of room for confusion. Here are a few of the myths that are swirling around income-producing securities. Granted, not all are out-and-out falsehoods; some of them may hold up in certain situations. But at a minimum, investors shouldn't accept them without first thinking through their own situations, especially their time horizons.

Myth 1: if rates are going to rise, you're always better off buying individual bonds than bond funds

This one comes up a lot, and it's not as though there isn't some truth to it. If you buy an individual bond at the time of issuance and hold it until maturity, you will get your money back in the end, as well as your interest payments along the way, assuming you bought the bond from a creditworthy issuer.

By contrast, you won't always get the same amount back from your bond fund that you put in. For example, say you put money into a long-term bond fund and interest rates shot up by two percentage points between the time of your purchase and the time you sell. It's very likely the bonds in the portfolio would have declined in value over your holding period, even if the yield on your fund perked up. (Of course, the opposite can also happen; rates can go down, as they did in 2014, and the bond fund holder may see his or her principal value grow, even as the fund's yield has declined.)

For some investors, that may seem like an out-and-out indictment of bond funds, especially given the likely rising long-term direction of interest rates. But while buying and holding individual bonds may help you circumvent one type of risk that the bond fund holder would confront head-on, you could still face an opportunity cost, which is also a risk.

If rates rise and you're determined to not take a loss on your bond, you're stuck with it until maturity. Meanwhile, as the various bonds in a fund's portfolio mature (and even if they don't), the bond fund can take advantage of new, higher-yielding bonds as they come to market. That helps offset any principal losses the fund incurs as rates go up.

Individual bond buyers can do something similar by building bond ladders, purchasing bonds of varying maturities to help ensure they can take advantage of varying interest rate environments. But it may take a lot of money to both ladder a bond portfolio and obtain adequate diversification across varying bond types. And by the time the investor does, the portfolio may look an awful lot like – you guessed it – a bond fund. Individual bond buyers may also face sizable trading costs. Of course, an individual may still opt to buy individual bonds rather than a bond fund but it's not true to say that doing so is automatically less risky than buying a fund. It's a trade-off.

Myth 2: high dividend-paying stocks are safer than bonds

In a related vein, some investors have dumped bonds altogether, supplanting them with high dividend-paying stocks. As well as the dividend stream, they may also gain some capital appreciation if the stock increases in value over the holding period and the company may also increase its dividend.

But as with buying individual bonds, there's a trade-off. Of course, stocks, even high-quality dividend payers, have much higher volatility than bonds, making them poor choices for investors who may need to pull their money out in less than 10 years. Moreover, stocks won't be impervious to interest rate increases and because investors increasingly have been using dividend payers as bond substitutes, they may be vulnerable to selling if rates head up and bonds become a more compelling alternative. Finally, it's worth noting that companies can cut their dividends in times of distress, as was painfully apparent to many dividend-dependent investors during the financial crisis.

Myth 3: cash is safer than bonds

This one, of course, technically is true. If you have money you can't afford to lose because you're going to use it next year to pay a big bill, it's best not to nudge out on the risk spectrum and into bonds. That holds true regardless of the prospective direction of interest rates.

But if your time horizon is longer, sinking too much into cash means you're virtually guaranteed to lose money once inflation is factored in. Investors might say that they'll steer their bond money to cash for only so long as it takes interest rates to go back to more meaningful levels and the threat of an interest rate shock has subsided. But how will they know when that is? As with any market inflection point, there won't be clanging bells letting you know it's OK to get back into bonds. Instead, a better strategy is to match your time horizon to the duration of your bond holdings: very short-term assets in cash, intermediate-term assets (with a time horizon of, say, three to 10 years) in core bond types and long-term assets in a diversified equity portfolio.


Christine Benz is Director of Personal Finance at Morningstar. This article was first published by Morningstar and is reproduced with permission. The information contained in this article is for general education purposes and does not consider any investor’s personal circumstances.


Leave a Comment:



Are you in fixed interest for the duration?

Global credit valuations: are we there yet?

Busting the bond myth


Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates


10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?


Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?


D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.


Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.


Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.