Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 162

Index inclusion delayed for China but positives abound

China is one of the world’s most dynamic economies and the opportunities for investors to benefit from its growth story are tantalising.

While there was a degree of disappointment at MSCI's (a leading provider of global indexes) recent decision to delay the inclusion of China A-shares in its emerging markets and other indexes, investors are keeping their eye on the bigger picture. The long-term impact of the latest delay is likely to be minimal. The momentum is on China’s side: it’s a matter of ‘when’ China A-shares are included and not ‘if’.

MSCI recognises progress and changes

As a long-term investor in China (we’ve been there since 1997 and were the first Australian institution to secure a Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) quota), it was positive to see MSCI recognise the ongoing reform efforts in China and the progress that has already been made to make China A-shares more accessible for global investors. MSCI noted the ‘clear commitment’ by the Chinese authorities to bring the accessibility of China A-shares closer to international standards.

The improvements made during the last 12 months include the resolution of issues regarding beneficial ownership, trading suspensions and some capital mobility policies.

MSCI's announcement clarified areas requiring further improvements, such as the abolition of China’s quota system, liberalisation of capital mobility restrictions, and alignment of international accessibility standards. The 20% monthly repatriation limit of the prior-year net asset value remains a significant hurdle for investors that may be faced with redemptions, such as mutual funds. This must be satisfactorily addressed for MSCI inclusion.

How investors would benefit

Investors are already benefiting from the process towards inclusion. The moves undertaken by China to improve accessibility have made the China A-share market more efficient and attractive to international investors. The weighting in various indexes will be minimal to start, at about 5% of the China index, which equates to a 1.1% weighting in the emerging markets index.

Even a small initial partial inclusion will attract greater flows to the China A-share market, particularly from institutional investors. These investors, such as pension funds, are also more likely to invest for the long term compared with the local retail investors that make up the bulk of China A-shareholders. Retail investors are notoriously focused on the short term and, given their weighting in the China A-share market, this contributes to some of the market’s volatility. Diluting the retail shareholding will hopefully have the added bonus of making it a less volatile place to invest.

When a 100% inclusion factor is applied, China A-shares would represent approximately 18.2% of the emerging market index, according to MSCI, making it the largest constituent within the index, exceeding even Korea. But it will be a gradual process. For instance, it took six years for Korea to go from 20% to full inclusion and nine years for Taiwan to go from 50% to full inclusion.

Ultimately, MSCI has stated that the future pace at which China's partial inclusion factor is raised will depend solely on the development and further reform of the Chinese market. Given the speed at which China develops and the commitment towards addressing the remaining accessibility issues, China’s growth path may be faster than other countries.

China A-shares will remain on MSCI's 2017 review list for partial inclusion but it may happen sooner than June next year. MSCI has flagged it may bring forward a decision before the scheduled timeframe if significant positive developments occur ahead of time.

 

Patrick Ho is Head of Asian Equities at AMP Capital. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   30 June 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.