Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 162

Index inclusion delayed for China but positives abound

China is one of the world’s most dynamic economies and the opportunities for investors to benefit from its growth story are tantalising.

While there was a degree of disappointment at MSCI's (a leading provider of global indexes) recent decision to delay the inclusion of China A-shares in its emerging markets and other indexes, investors are keeping their eye on the bigger picture. The long-term impact of the latest delay is likely to be minimal. The momentum is on China’s side: it’s a matter of ‘when’ China A-shares are included and not ‘if’.

MSCI recognises progress and changes

As a long-term investor in China (we’ve been there since 1997 and were the first Australian institution to secure a Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) quota), it was positive to see MSCI recognise the ongoing reform efforts in China and the progress that has already been made to make China A-shares more accessible for global investors. MSCI noted the ‘clear commitment’ by the Chinese authorities to bring the accessibility of China A-shares closer to international standards.

The improvements made during the last 12 months include the resolution of issues regarding beneficial ownership, trading suspensions and some capital mobility policies.

MSCI's announcement clarified areas requiring further improvements, such as the abolition of China’s quota system, liberalisation of capital mobility restrictions, and alignment of international accessibility standards. The 20% monthly repatriation limit of the prior-year net asset value remains a significant hurdle for investors that may be faced with redemptions, such as mutual funds. This must be satisfactorily addressed for MSCI inclusion.

How investors would benefit

Investors are already benefiting from the process towards inclusion. The moves undertaken by China to improve accessibility have made the China A-share market more efficient and attractive to international investors. The weighting in various indexes will be minimal to start, at about 5% of the China index, which equates to a 1.1% weighting in the emerging markets index.

Even a small initial partial inclusion will attract greater flows to the China A-share market, particularly from institutional investors. These investors, such as pension funds, are also more likely to invest for the long term compared with the local retail investors that make up the bulk of China A-shareholders. Retail investors are notoriously focused on the short term and, given their weighting in the China A-share market, this contributes to some of the market’s volatility. Diluting the retail shareholding will hopefully have the added bonus of making it a less volatile place to invest.

When a 100% inclusion factor is applied, China A-shares would represent approximately 18.2% of the emerging market index, according to MSCI, making it the largest constituent within the index, exceeding even Korea. But it will be a gradual process. For instance, it took six years for Korea to go from 20% to full inclusion and nine years for Taiwan to go from 50% to full inclusion.

Ultimately, MSCI has stated that the future pace at which China's partial inclusion factor is raised will depend solely on the development and further reform of the Chinese market. Given the speed at which China develops and the commitment towards addressing the remaining accessibility issues, China’s growth path may be faster than other countries.

China A-shares will remain on MSCI's 2017 review list for partial inclusion but it may happen sooner than June next year. MSCI has flagged it may bring forward a decision before the scheduled timeframe if significant positive developments occur ahead of time.

 

Patrick Ho is Head of Asian Equities at AMP Capital. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   30 June 2016
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.