Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 366

International LICs can have a fully franked future

The international equity listed investment company (LIC) proposition is under siege, with almost all trading for extended periods at material discounts to their net tangible asset (NTA) values. The March 2020 market crash, subsequent evaporation of liquidity and widening of the discount has driven a further nail in the coffin, giving ammunition to critics who claim the LIC structure (and listed investment trusts, or LITs) is a negative in the value equation.

So where to from here? Undoubtedly, many fund managers will put their heads in the sand and ignore the problem. Others, running small sub-scale funds will use this as an opportunity to throw in the towel and liquidate or transition to complicated and untested structures.

Dividends in global and local stock markets

But there is another solution for the crème of the crop of international LICs that has the potential to transform the sector and enable it to flourish. This solution can be found in the structural advantages of the LIC as well as the insatiable demand from Australian investors for fully franked dividends.

Historically, most of these LICs have offered meagre and volatile yields, reflecting the generally low level of dividends paid by offshore companies and the erratic nature of realising net capital gains.

Conversely, Australian investors have prized stable, higher-yielding, fully franked dividends stocks above all else, focusing on Australian ‘blue chips’. However, with so many of these stocks now slashing dividends, investors recognise the need for alternative and more secure ways of generating fully franked dividends.

Bizarre as it may seem, it is possible to transform the way in which the ‘better’ international equity LICs operate, so that these vehicles become some of the most reliable fully franked dividend-yielding stocks. It may enable them to be used as a replacement for the blue chips that have disappointed.

Why are LICs well placed to pay stable dividends?

The only requirement for a LIC to pay dividends is to have sufficient liquidity, which is extremely unlikely to be a constraint for LICs that invest in liquid stocks and have no debt. This is unlike many other companies that are limited in their ability to pay dividends due to capital constraints, illiquidity or debt covenants such as banks, infrastructure and property vehicles.

However, many LIC managers are reluctant to commit to paying out consistent ongoing dividends as this reduces size, thereby negatively impacting their fees. This is compounded by a fear of being required to pay out dividends in periods where the LIC has suffered large negative return.

However, fund managers who not only provide strong returns to investors but also focus on capital preservation during market falls should be able to meet this commitment.

In order to pay fully franked dividends, a LIC must satisfy two tests.

Firstly, it must generate profits in a specific tax-paying period or alternatively to have profit reserves, to cover the dividend.

Secondly, it must pay sufficient tax from realising net capital gains.

It is impossible to guarantee having profits in a particular tax-paying period. However, some LICs have accumulated large profit reserves, enabling them to satisfy the first test over many years to come.

Obviously LICs cannot be guaranteed to satisfy the second test, but for fund managers who generally hold their positions over multiple years and invest in liquid stocks (that make it easy to recognise capital gains by trading in-and-out of) this should be relatively straightforward to achieve.

Global equities offer more opportunities

Finally, generating stable fully franked dividends is not sufficient, as managers must also deliver good long-term performance. This should not pose a huge problem in an international equity universe which is awash with a diverse range of opportunities.

There is a risk that proceeding down the path of stable, fully franked dividends could negatively impact fund manager fees and business models. However, we believe this is a risk worth taking, especially considering the long-term benefits of strong investor demand and retaining some of the benefits of the LIC structure.

Pengana International Equities Limited (PIA) recently 'relaunched' by changing its mandate to become the first international equities LIC to aim for stable fully franked dividends as well as good long-term returns. PIA has already built up profit reserves and is managing the portfolio to take additional profits when stocks hit our price targets. 

Local investors usually turn to Australian shares to generate franking credits, but an international fund can be run with the same aspiration. In an environment where investors are desperate for fully franked dividends, it remains to be seen which other global managers have the opportunity and inclination to follow.

 

Russel Pillemer is co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Pengana Capital Group. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Managing LIC discounts and premiums

The merits of investing in LICs at a discount

A checklist for buying LICs at a discount

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.