Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 473

Investment opportunities in the global energy crunch

As we look across businesses exposed both negatively and positively to longer-term energy prices, we believe the risk of a prolonged energy shortage is not truly appreciated by markets. And this dislocation offers significant opportunities to investors willing to look at the whole picture.

Traditionally, high energy prices would trigger new investment in the sector creating increased supply that would bring prices back down. This conventional capital cycle in the energy sector typically takes five to 10 years to play out in full.

An extended cycle

Over the past six to eight years, however, there has been a noticeable lack of investment in the sector, as companies have either cut or not increased their capital expenditure.

The current underinvestment is the result of a number of factors.

1. In recent years investors have been more attracted to high growth companies, and as a result are valuing the future promise of cash as highly as having cash in their pocket today. This means they’ve tended to pour investment into startups that burn money to grow quickly, and drained capital from ‘old economy’ businesses – such as traditional oil and gas - that already make money but grow more slowly.

2. Increasingly urgent climate concerns have also been a headwind to traditional energy companies. The growing recognition that a clean energy transition is critical to our survival has clouded the demand outlook for new projects and the capital required to build them has become far less abundant and far more costly.

Together, these factors have created a longer and less efficient capital cycle in the energy sector that not only heightens the possibility of longer-lasting volatility and energy shortages but also presents opportunities to contrarian investors with a truly long-term mindset.

For while the fundamentals of these energy companies look better than they have in years, in our view they remain cheap. At current oil and gas prices, the sector offers an average free cash flow yield of around 20%. The challenge, however, is distinguishing the deservedly cheap from the attractively undervalued. A 20% free cash flow yield doesn’t count for much if a company has no future, and some energy companies probably don’t. But we believe some producers, like Shell, Inpex, and Chesapeake, as well as infrastructure companies like pipeline operator Kinder Morgan, will have a role to play for years to come.

Shell – relic or future leader?

Let’s take Shell as an example.

Most people see it as a fossil fuel company, but we see it more as a diversified energy business that is well-positioned to aid the energy transition. Shell has already committed to net-zero emissions by 2050 - a target that includes not only its own emissions but also the impact of the energy products it sells to customers.

A key part of this is Shell’s exposure to natural gas—a fuel that we see as key to facilitating the energy transition— but also through its renewables, its infrastructure and its petrol stations. In addition, it has a trading arm that matches energy supply and demand around the world, which could be increasingly valuable in a volatile and energy scarce environment.

On top of this, not only is it highly cash generative, but the nature of its business means it offers longer-term inflation protection and resilience against energy shocks.

Given all this, you might expect Shell to trade at a premium, especially in light of the concerns around energy security that are beginning to emerge in all corners of the global economy.

However, the market currently seems to be disregarding these issues. Shell, for example, is one of those with a double-digit free cash flow yield – a measure of how financially stable a company is – which is clearly attractive. This is demonstrated by the fact it is returning money to shareholders through share buybacks and a divided yield of around 4%, as well as earnings growth.

A bumpy ride?

Of course, there are always potential headwinds that we would be foolish not to consider. When investing in energy companies today, we are mindful about the risk of stranded assets. Particularly if the demand for oil declines sharply through recession, or from the world transitioning away from fossil fuels faster than we are expecting.

This would create uncertainty about the future and deliver a bumpy ride for investors.

The environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks associated with energy companies are also something that cannot be overlooked. While we believe Shell is responsibly running down its oil business, harvesting existing assets and investing in its transition and growth groups, which have much longer lives ahead of them, others may disagree and question our approach to responsible investing principles.

For the first time, the world is trying to optimise the global economy not just for efficiency, but also for emissions, and our challenge as responsible stewards of our clients’ capital is to understand how much of this energy transition is priced into current valuations.

Thinking differently

There are no easy answers to these issues, but ultimately, we would prefer to be an engaged shareholder of a company like Shell – holding them to account on their commitments – rather than divesting. If Shell, for example, disappeared tomorrow, demand for its products would remain and would be filled by a different producer. Potentially one that is a private or state-owned entity that is less transparent regarding ESG and climate issues such as emission reporting and targets.

Equally, there are potential economic and political headwinds that could affect some parts of the energy sector. High energy prices have resulted in bumper profits for many energy companies – Shell included – that have caught the eye of governments looking to introduce so-called ‘windfall taxes’.

The impact of these policies is still uncertain, as different jurisdictions have different approaches, but with the cost-of-living crisis unlikely to abate any time soon, this is not an area that should be ignored.

That said, even after considering these potential risks we think certain critical energy infrastructure holdings such as Shell, Sunrun (solar), Vestas Wind Systems (wind), Constellation Energy (nuclear) and Kinder Morgan (gas pipelines), among others, are in a good position - with higher margins, better capital discipline and lower debt. They are also in a cycle of harvesting healthy oil/gas prices while returning capital to investors.

We believe that is a recipe for attractive potential returns, and a good example of how our contrarian bottom-up approach can identify inefficiencies and dislocations in the market to spot interesting opportunities.

 

Shane Woldendorp, Investment Specialist, Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This report contains general information only and not personal financial or investment advice. It does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or individual needs of any particular person.

For more articles and papers from Orbis, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Why are some companies vulnerable in 2022?

Emerging market equities are ripe with opportunity

Bull and bear case for Australian equities for FY25

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Meg on SMSFs: Clearing up confusion on the $3 million super tax

There seems to be more confusion than clarity about the mechanics of how the new $3 million super tax is supposed to work. Here is an attempt to answer some of the questions from my previous work on the issue. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 566 with weekend update

Here are 10 rules for staying happy and sharp as we age, including socialise a lot, never retire, learn a demanding skill, practice gratitude, play video games (specific ones), and be sure to reminisce.

  • 27 June 2024

Australian housing is twice as expensive as the US

A new report suggests Australian housing is twice as expensive as that of the US and UK on a price-to-income basis. It also reveals that it’s cheaper to live in New York than most of our capital cities.

The catalyst for a LICs rebound

The discounts on listed investment vehicles are at historically wide levels. There are lots of reasons given, including size and liquidity, yet there's a better explanation for the discounts, and why a rebound may be near.

How not to run out of money in retirement

The life expectancy tables used throughout the financial advice and retirement industry have issues and you need to prepare for the possibility of living a lot longer than you might have thought. Plan accordingly.

The iron law of building wealth

The best way to lose money in markets is to chase the latest stock fad. Conversely, the best way to build wealth is by pursuing a timeless investment strategy that won’t be swayed by short-term market gyrations.

Latest Updates

Financial planning

Our finances should enable and not dictate our lives

Most people would prefer to have more money than less of it. But at what point do the trappings of wealth and success start to outweigh the benefits of striving for more?

Economy

This vital yet "forgotten" indicator of inflation holds good news

Financial commentators seem to have forgotten the leading cause of inflation: growth in the supply of money. Warren Bird explains the link and explores where it suggests inflation is headed.

Shares

Emerging market equities are ripe with opportunity

Emerging markets offer compelling value compared to history and the stretched valuations of developed market equities. Investors can benefit from three big tailwinds, but only if they are selective.

Taxation

Tomorrow's taxpayers pay for today's policy mistakes

Less affordable housing isn't the only thing set to weigh on Australia's younger generations. If new solutions for pension deficits and the use of resource revenue aren't found quickly, tomorrow's taxpayer will foot the bill.

How would a switch to nuclear affect electricity prices?

The Coalition's plan to build seven nuclear power stations in 15 years faces scrutiny due to high costs and slow construction. And it is unlikely the investment would yield cheaper energy for Australian households and industry.

Strategy

Reader feedback from our 2024 survey

Articles that are easy to understand, quick to read, and credible; being able to engage via the comments section; and keeping Firstlinks free and independent are just some of the features valued by our readers.

Strategy

Have your say on Firstlinks and the topics we cover

We’d love to hear your thoughts on Firstlinks and how we can make it better for you. If you’d like to help us out in a just a couple of minutes, please take our short survey.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.