Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 222

What do investors value in financial advice?

Challenged on one front by robots and on the other by a general reluctance among the wider public to pay for advice, some financial planners have been experiencing an existential crisis in recent years.

One obvious response among advice firms has been to fight the technology-led commodification of advice by going for scale, cutting costs and industrialising processes as much as feasible. A second response has been for advisers to stop and ask themselves exactly what it is that investors (or at least those willing to pay for financial advice) feel they value most from the human side of the service. A third response, and one pursued in a new global survey, is to ask investors themselves what they value.

The survey of almost 19,000 investors (clients of 436 participating firms in eight countries) by Dimensional Fund Advisers offers insights for firms reflecting on what they can offer and charge for beyond what’s available in an app.

Investment returns rank below security and peace of mind

The most notable outcome of the survey, which covered Australia, New Zealand, the US, Canada, the UK and Europe, was that investment returns rank well below other more qualitative factors for end investors. Asked how they primarily measure the value they receive from their adviser, investors’ most cited benefit was a sense of security and peace of mind, which was the top value among 35% of respondents. Second on the list was the adviser’s knowledge of their personal financial situation (23%), followed by a sense of making progress toward their goals (20%). Investment returns came in fourth among the key benefits at 14%. While all this might seem predictable at first glance, it’s arguable whether many financial planning firms really position themselves primarily in that light, as wealth counsellors and behavioural mentors.

While advisors may be tempted to promote their value as ‘generating good returns’, the real value they offer is getting clients to where they want to go. Returns are part of that, of course, but the advisor’s main value-add is keeping clients focused on the areas within their control. Promising ‘good returns’ only means having to explain when markets don’t deliver.

For instance, a financial plan that involves taking big risks in volatile assets whose ups and downs are more than the client can comfortably live with is probably not going to be a successful plan in delivering on the goal. In contrast, a plan that works within the clients’ risk preferences that allows them to sleep at night and that is built according to their own lifestyle and circumstances may be more successful, even if short-term returns are less eye-catching.

In other words, the destination is more achievable if the journey is tolerable. And that’s the value proposition for advisers that surfaced in this survey.

What can be controlled?

According to Dimensional’s co-CEO and Head of Global Financial Adviser Services, Dave Butler, the value that investors place on a sense of security is really an outcome of advisers setting the right expectations with each client. “By helping clients understand what they can and cannot control, advisers can create a different experience to help ease their concerns,” Butler says. The importance of the day-to-day experience also came through in answers to the question about what attribute investors consider most important in the adviser relationship. Of the survey sample, 31% cited the client service experience, while 26% said they ranked the adviser’s experience with clients like themselves.

With Australia’s superannuation system moving away from a lump sum to a retirement income goal, the survey’s findings were revealing. Asked to identify the most valuable retirement planning information they receive, 28% of respondents cited knowing how much they will be able to afford to spend each year, ranking ahead of the total amount they will have for retirement (22%). Correspondingly, the single most cited fear about personal finances was not having enough to live on comfortably in retirement (37%), followed by experiencing a significant loss in a market downturn (31%).


Jim Parker is Regional Director, Communications, for Dimensional Fund Advisors in Sydney. Dimensional has 12 offices in eight countries and global assets under management of AUD675 billion as at 30 June 2017.


The link between financial and mental health

Kitces Part 1: How robo misunderstood the advice model

Richard Thaler: Nobel economist changing our behaviour


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.