Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 307

Is good IPO access worth the costs involved?

There is considerable drive by regulators towards the power of transparency, and that shining a light deep into superannuation funds is empowering to fund members.

In line with this key theme, we recently ‘lit up’ the world of large superannuation fund investing to test the power of transparency on one area of Australian equity portfolio management – participation in initial public offerings (IPOs). The headlines and hype around IPOs may lead a superannuation fund investor to think it is a brightly-lit area. But there is considerable murkiness in the way IPO results are calculated and, in particular, what it really costs a fund to have an equity manager chase extra returns through IPO participation.

Our study sought to isolate the value an equity manager could have added through institutional bookbuild IPO participation, net of costs, across 2011-2018. We created a hypothetical large-cap Australian equity portfolio which, as a base case, participated in every IPO in the Australian market between 2011 and 2018 and received a fair (rather than preferential) allocation. The results were underwhelming, adding on average around 3.5 basis points each year to investment performance, before costs.

Is there value in superior IPO selection or better access?

Australian equity managers can be quick to assert that they can beat this ‘base case’ market experience and add value to their clients’ equity portfolios by cultivating relationships with lead IPO managers (brokers). This can lead to two sources of value-add: superior selection of IPOs and a preferential (better than fair) allocation of IPO stocks. Without individual managers sharing their data with us, we could not test whether a specific Australian equity manager can really add value to large superannuation fund portfolios through IPO participation. But scenario testing our hypothetical large-cap portfolio led to some interesting observations.

A key finding is that IPO participation pay-offs have a hidden cost attached which are rarely included in calculations of IPO value-add.

The costs are in the form of directing trade volumes (‘flows’) to specific brokers and paying higher than execution-only brokerage rates on equity trades, day in and day out. This is a kind of investment to cultivate the manager’s relationship with the broker – using the client’s investment capital – with the hope that, amongst other things, the manager can benefit when IPO deals come along from superior selection (judging which IPOs to participate in) and from receiving a generous allocation of the IPO stocks pre-listing day from the broker.

The costs of buying favour with a broker

That daily favouring of particular brokers instead of simply pursuing lowest-cost best execution on every equity trade costs more than one might think. Over our analysis period, brokerage rates on large-cap equity trades averaged 10-20 basis points (0.1% to 0.2%), while execution-only brokerage was available at 5 basis points (0.05%). For a $1 billion actively-managed superannuation equity portfolio with modest 50% one-way turnover each year (100% two-way), the manager’s alpha-chasing ‘round trips’ cost the fund $1-2 million in brokerage instead of $500,000 each year. That difference is quite a ‘bogey’ for IPO participation to beat. At a minimum, it is essential to capture some of these higher trading costs in any calculation of IPO participation pay-off.

Capturing these costs, a manager who is twice as good at choosing IPOs or securing access as the market (our base case) is still, after costs, only able to advance the portfolio by about 5 basis points (0.05%) a year. The manager has to be at least four times better than the market to even get the performance contribution from IPO participation into double digits (10 basis points or 0.1%); five times better lifts the value of IPO participation only to 12.5 basis points (0.125%) annually.

While every basis point of return counts, shining a light on this aspect of equity investing suggests a reality quite different from the hype that surrounds IPOs.

Declining opportunity set

We are nervous about the value of IPOs as an opportunity set, given how seasonal and unpredictable it is, not to mention the interesting U.S. trend for companies to shun public markets for capital raisings. Industry predictions are for ‘slim pickings’ for IPO deals in 2019 in Australia. This means even a manager with the best IPO selection skills securing the best allocations simply cannot add value when there is little company appetite to raise public funds.

There is an alternative, solid path for managers to pursue on behalf of their large superannuation fund clients. They could adopt, as a default position, simple, nuts-and-bolts best execution and transactional efficiency, without favour or generosity to any particular broker, every day on every equity trade. This opportunity set is always available and has pay-offs that are transparent, measurable and consistent.

We do not rule out the prospect of some managers (especially in the small-caps space) harvesting sizeable returns through IPO participation. But we see IPOs as another area that needs to be brightly lit, to empower large superannuation funds and other investors to look behind the headlines and hype to determine where the true value lies.

 

Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric Australia, a US-based investment advisor. This is general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Additional information is available at parametricportfolio.com.au.

RELATED ARTICLES

The biggest rort of all

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 373

It was a milestone for strange times last week when the company with the longest record in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index, ExxonMobil, once the largest company in the world, was replaced by a software company, Salesforce. Only one company in the original DJIA exists today. As businesses are disrupted, how many of the current DJIA companies will disappear in the next decade or two?

  • 2 September 2020

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

COVID-19 and the events of 2020 show why, more than ever, SMSF trustees need to prepare for the ‘unexpected’ by having an Enduring Power of Attorney in place. A Power of Attorney is not enough.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Shares

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

Gold

Interview Series: Why it’s gold’s time to shine

With gold now on the radar of individual investors, SMSFs and institutions, here's what you need to know about the choices between gold bars, gold ETFs and even gold miners, with Jordan Eliseo. 

SMSF strategies

SMSFs during COVID-19 and your 14-point checklist

SMSFs come with an administration burden underestimated by many. For example, did you know trustees need to document a member’s decision to take the reduced pension minimum under the new COVID rules?

Retirement

Funding retirement through a stock market crash

On the surface, a diversified fund looks the same as an SMSF with the same asset allocations. But to fund retirement, a member must sell units in the fund, whereas the cash balance is used in an SMSF.

Australia’s debt and interest burden: can we afford it?

Australia has an ageing population and rising welfare and health costs, but it is still the best placed among its ‘developed’ country peers. Here's why the expected levels of debt are manageable.

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 375

There are many ways to value a company, but the most popular is to estimate the future cash flows and discount them to a present value using a chosen interest rate. Does it follow that when interest rates fall, companies become more valuable? Perhaps, but only if the cash flows remain unchanged, and in a recession, future earnings are more difficult to sustain. What do Buffett and Douglass and 150 years of data say?

  • 16 September 2020
  • 5

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.