Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 159

How Japan’s 'Abe-nomics' affects Australian investments

'Abe-nomics' is the name given to the economic programme of Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, with another former PM Taro Aso as finance minister, since they were returned to power in the December 2012 election. This radical programme has important implications for Australian investment markets.

Japan’s boom and bust

Japan’s economy has been virtually stagnant since the great Japanese bubble burst at the start of the 1990s. Japan was the great ‘emerging market’ of the post WW2 era – much like China has been for the past two decades. Actually Japan was more of a ‘re-emerging’ market since it had previously ‘emerged’ from three centuries of isolation to become an industrial and military giant in the late 19th century and early 20th century. Japan grew literally out of the rubble of WW2 to become the richest country in the world by the 1970s and 1980s. It became the second largest economy in the world behind the US despite having only half the population of the US. Over the same period the US went from being the world’s largest creditor nation to the largest debtor while Japan became the largest creditor. In the late 1980s, the Japanese stock market even overtook the US market in total value.

But it all came crashing down when the bubble burst after peaking on the last day of the 1980s. The collapse triggered a massive banking crisis that still has not been fully resolved nearly 30 years later. Prices of Japanese shares and real estate have still not recovered their late 1980s peak values even today (so much for ‘buy and hold’ investing!). The economy stalled and has been drifting in and out of recession ever since. Even worse, deflation took hold, driving up the yen and hurting exports and tax revenues. Japan is now the world’s largest debtor and the largest creditor is China.

Abe-nomics

After more than two decades of stagnation and failed experiments, Japan needed a radical new plan. Shinzo Abe and Taro Aso’s radical 'Abe-nomics' programme has several aims: to stimulate growth by cutting interest rates and raising asset prices to encourage spending and investment; to depress the yen to assist exporters and protect local industries from imports; and to create inflation so people will spend rather than save.

The four arrows in the plan

There are four ‘arrows’ in the plan:

  1. Monetary policy, with low and now negative interest rates and QE and central bank buying of assets with newly printed money.
  2. Fiscal policy, with deficit-funded spending programs
  3. Structural reforms, such as in the labour market and in protected industries.
  4. (An unwritten but potentially very powerful fourth) Nationalism, aimed against China, since there is nothing like uniting a nation against a common enemy to spur confidence and spending.

There are also additional measures, including directing pension funds to invest more in shares and other ‘risky’ assets.

From late 2012 until mid-2015 Abe-nomics worked well on the yen and share prices but did nothing to revive economic growth or inflation. The yen fell 40% and the Nikkei 225 index of stock prices rose 140% in lock-step, as shown in the chart below.

Yen_Nikkei

Yen_Nikkei

Then Abe-nomics ran out of steam in mid-2015 and things started to reverse: the yen rose and share prices fell back. Ultra-low and even negative interest rates and QE were losing their effect and structural reforms ground to a halt.

Impact on Australia

Why is this important for Australia? Japanese buying of foreign assets (driven by negative Japanese interest rates and a collapsing yen) has provided a major boost to the prices of Australian shares, bonds and property (listed and unlisted) since 2012. The above also shows how the Australian All Ordinaries Index has followed the path of Japanese stock prices and the yen during the period.

The Abe-nomics effect is likely to receive another boost (flowing through to Australian shares, listed property and bonds) in the coming year as the yen resumes its falls while the US dollar rises with US rate hikes.

Three factors are now in play.

The first is that the US Fed seems ready for more interest rate hikes. This expectation is driving up the US dollar once again after it receded in early 2016 while the Fed sat on its hands.

The second is the Japanese government and central bank appear to be preparing further stimulus actions after several months of inaction.

The third is geo-politics. With the US dollar rising again, the US is now openly opposing yen depreciation – a big switch in strategy since it had supported Japan’s depreciation efforts initially. The switch in US policy is due to the increasingly protectionist rhetoric from both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the US election race.

We expect Japan to win the next phase of the currency war, which would see the US dollar rise, the yen fall and more Japanese money flowing out of Japan to buy foreign assets like Australian shares, property and bonds.

Rising global currency wars and protectionism means the RBA may need to cut rates even further to keep the AUD from rising as the US, Europe, Japan and China all compete to lower their exchange rates. Further rate cuts here would reduce interest rates on bank deposits and would also risk re-igniting the local housing bubble.

 

Ashley Owen (CFA, BA, LLB, LLM, Grad. Dip. App. Fin) has been an active investor since the mid-1980s, a senior executive of major global banking and finance groups, and currently advises investors and advisory groups in Australia and Asia. This article is general information only and does not consider the personal circumstances of any individual.

RELATED ARTICLES

Liquidity is abundant despite QE wind down

QE causes currency and fiscal impotence

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.