Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 41

Keating’s margin notes on the start of national super

If you missed the second episode of Kerry O’Brien’s interviews with Paul Keating, it is still on ABC TV’s iview for a few more days, here. Well worth watching this insight into political power.

There’s a fascinating moment shortly after the start. The camera pans through the back room of Keating’s office, and shows him at work on a computer, reading a scanned newspaper. Kerry O’Brien says:

“Particularly revealing are his often candid notes handwritten in the margins at the time. He has a meticulous archive of more than 10,000 newspaper articles going back to the 1970s, collected personally week by week.”

The camera then focusses on a particular newspaper, The Australian Financial Review of Thursday 5 September 1985. It is stamped, ‘PJ Keating personal collection’. The headline on the lead story says, ‘Accord ... but costly’, written by Gerard Noonan. The opening paragraph of the lead article is:

“Not without some significant short term pain, the Australian Council of Trade Unions has scored a major coup in gaining - almost overnight - superannuation coverage for all wage and salary earners.”

And in the top right corner of the page, written in Paul Keating’s elegant handwriting, it says:

“The beginning of national super”

So there’s as good a record as any, from the father of modern superannuation. The historic date is 4 September 1985, not seven years later when the national superannuation guarantee started.

(Paul Keating wrote three articles on superannuation for Cuffelinks, listed here).

http://cuffelinks.com.au/where-did-smsfs-come-from-and-where-are-they-going/

http://cuffelinks.com.au/dividend-imputation-and-superannuation-are-worth-fighting-for/

http://cuffelinks.com.au/living-longer-and-superannuation/

 

  •   22 November 2013
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Jimbo
November 21, 2013

I do not understand the point of this article. The legislation start date was 1992. Clearly it would take many years of planning and trying to get it through parliament before the legislation was enacted. Is this surprising?

Harry Chemay
November 22, 2013

Actually Jimbo the reference to September 1985 was to the National Wage Case claim made by the ACTU (under the leadership of by Bill Kelty) to the then Conciliation and Arbitration Commission.

These 'Accords' with the then Treasurer Keating paved the way for the introduction of the Occupational Superannuation Standards Act 1987 which extended super coverage from a select few (public sector employees and certain corporate employees) to the unionised workforce.

The OSSA was in turn superseded by the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 which heralded the arrival of 'universal superannuation' for (almost) all employees.

Steve Schubert
November 22, 2013

Actually Harry, OSSA and the SG Act were completely different. Before OSSA, super was regulated under the Tax Act. OSSA was the first attempt to separate prudential regulation from the ATO which is primarily interested in protecting the integrity of the tax system. This ultimately led to APRA.
The SG Act was intended to improve on the extension of super which came out of that National Wage case. Before the 1985 changes, super was most common in the public sector, many large employers (especially white collar workers) and some unionised industries (eg Coal, Seafarers, Stevedores, TWU, and, from 1984, Building and Construction). The 1985 Wage case extended this through a number of Awards but the system was not yet truly national as some workers weren't covered by Awards and not all employers fully complied with Awards. Keating knew that his vision of truly National Super could not be completed through the Award system alone and finished the job with the Super guarantee.

Jezzi
November 22, 2013

What good eyesight you have to discern the handwritten note made by the ‘father of Australian superannuation’ on his baby’s birth notice.

Graham Hand
November 22, 2013

Exactly my point, Jimbo. You say national super started 1992, Keating says 1985. I say Keating is a greater authority on this. Who said anything about the Superannuation Guarantee?

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.