Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 41

Keating’s margin notes on the start of national super

If you missed the second episode of Kerry O’Brien’s interviews with Paul Keating, it is still on ABC TV’s iview for a few more days, here. Well worth watching this insight into political power.

There’s a fascinating moment shortly after the start. The camera pans through the back room of Keating’s office, and shows him at work on a computer, reading a scanned newspaper. Kerry O’Brien says:

“Particularly revealing are his often candid notes handwritten in the margins at the time. He has a meticulous archive of more than 10,000 newspaper articles going back to the 1970s, collected personally week by week.”

The camera then focusses on a particular newspaper, The Australian Financial Review of Thursday 5 September 1985. It is stamped, ‘PJ Keating personal collection’. The headline on the lead story says, ‘Accord ... but costly’, written by Gerard Noonan. The opening paragraph of the lead article is:

“Not without some significant short term pain, the Australian Council of Trade Unions has scored a major coup in gaining - almost overnight - superannuation coverage for all wage and salary earners.”

And in the top right corner of the page, written in Paul Keating’s elegant handwriting, it says:

“The beginning of national super”

So there’s as good a record as any, from the father of modern superannuation. The historic date is 4 September 1985, not seven years later when the national superannuation guarantee started.

(Paul Keating wrote three articles on superannuation for Cuffelinks, listed here).

http://cuffelinks.com.au/where-did-smsfs-come-from-and-where-are-they-going/

http://cuffelinks.com.au/dividend-imputation-and-superannuation-are-worth-fighting-for/

http://cuffelinks.com.au/living-longer-and-superannuation/

 

  •   22 November 2013
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Jimbo
November 21, 2013

I do not understand the point of this article. The legislation start date was 1992. Clearly it would take many years of planning and trying to get it through parliament before the legislation was enacted. Is this surprising?

Harry Chemay
November 22, 2013

Actually Jimbo the reference to September 1985 was to the National Wage Case claim made by the ACTU (under the leadership of by Bill Kelty) to the then Conciliation and Arbitration Commission.

These 'Accords' with the then Treasurer Keating paved the way for the introduction of the Occupational Superannuation Standards Act 1987 which extended super coverage from a select few (public sector employees and certain corporate employees) to the unionised workforce.

The OSSA was in turn superseded by the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 which heralded the arrival of 'universal superannuation' for (almost) all employees.

Steve Schubert
November 22, 2013

Actually Harry, OSSA and the SG Act were completely different. Before OSSA, super was regulated under the Tax Act. OSSA was the first attempt to separate prudential regulation from the ATO which is primarily interested in protecting the integrity of the tax system. This ultimately led to APRA.
The SG Act was intended to improve on the extension of super which came out of that National Wage case. Before the 1985 changes, super was most common in the public sector, many large employers (especially white collar workers) and some unionised industries (eg Coal, Seafarers, Stevedores, TWU, and, from 1984, Building and Construction). The 1985 Wage case extended this through a number of Awards but the system was not yet truly national as some workers weren't covered by Awards and not all employers fully complied with Awards. Keating knew that his vision of truly National Super could not be completed through the Award system alone and finished the job with the Super guarantee.

Jezzi
November 22, 2013

What good eyesight you have to discern the handwritten note made by the ‘father of Australian superannuation’ on his baby’s birth notice.

Graham Hand
November 22, 2013

Exactly my point, Jimbo. You say national super started 1992, Keating says 1985. I say Keating is a greater authority on this. Who said anything about the Superannuation Guarantee?

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.