Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 199

Do LIC options provide investors with value?

Since January 2013, there have been 30 new listed investment companies (LICs) join the ASX. Each of these LICs issued investors with options as part of the initial public offer (IPO). In most cases, investors received one 'free' option for each share, although there were some offers where the ratio was less than one-for-one. Why do LICs include options as part of their IPO structure and why are they seemingly popular with investors?

LIC options often expire valueless

Due to the expenses associated with an IPO, the initial Net Tangible Assets (NTA) of a new LIC will be below the issue price of its shares, so a new LIC with an offer price of $1.00 will have a starting NTA below $1.00. The discount to offer price will vary, but generally costs equate to 2-3% of the amount raised. By offering investors a ‘free’ option there is the perception of providing value to compensate for the IPO costs. The option initially has some ‘time value’ in that it allows the investor to subscribe for additional shares in the LIC at some time in the future, normally at the IPO issue price.

Most LIC options have expiry dates between 12 to 24 months after the IPO date. Theoretically, the market value of the option on listing will offset the reduced NTA arising from the IPO costs. In time, the option may also gain some intrinsic value if the price of the underlying shares rises above the offer price, driven by increases in NTA due to portfolio performance.

However, our analysis shows that options often expire without delivering any real value to LIC investors. Of the 30 LICs in our study, options for 15 of these LICs have already reached expiry. Nine experienced take up rates of less than 50%, with seven achieving take up rates of 15% or less. So, a significant number of investors who acquired shares in these LICs received no value for their options. Generally, options will not be exercised if the underlying shares are trading below the exercise price, as it makes no sense to acquire new shares at a higher price through an options exercise when they can be bought cheaper on-market. For Wealth Defender Equities (ASX:WDE), PM Capital Asian Opportunities Fund (ASX:PAF), Perpetual Investment Company (ASX:PIC) and CBG Capital (ASX:CBC) almost all their options lapsed at expiry. Investors who sold their options in these LICs on-market would have been in a better position than those who let the options lapse at expiry.

Dilutive effect for existing shareholders

Another issue for investors is that options exercised at a price below NTA will be dilutive to existing shareholders. There were six LICs in our study that achieved option take up rates above 50%. In each case, the new shares were issued at a discount to NTA. For investors who acquired shares in the IPO and exercised their options, this is not such an issue, as they would have received new shares at a discount to NTA. However, investors who did not exercise their options would have seen value transferred to those that did.

Investors who acquired shares on-market in the period post-IPO would also have experienced dilution via a drop in NTA without receiving new shares at a discount as compensation. Two LICs in our study achieved higher option take up rates due to underwritten options shortfall arrangements, which effectively resulted in a transfer of value from those investors that did not take up their options to the new investors that took up shares as a result of the underwriting arrangements. Bailador Technology Investments (ASX:BTI) had 24.5 million of its 31 March 2016 options underwritten, or 39% of the total options issue. The arrangement resulted in Washington Soul H. Pattinson becoming a 20% shareholder in BTI. The shares were issued at a large discount to NTA and we estimate the total dilutive impact of the options to be about 8%. Glennon Small Companies Fund (ASX:GC1) had 57% of its 18 August 2016 options underwritten with the new shares issued at a 16% discount to its prior month pre-tax NTA. We estimate the dilutive impact of these options to be about 6%.

Another reason LICs issue options is that it provides a potential opportunity for the manager to increase the size of the LIC if the options are exercised. In the case of a one-for-one option issue, the LIC size will double if all options are exercised, resulting in a higher fee base for the manager. Managers argue that a larger share base is also beneficial for LIC investors as it increases the market liquidity of the stock and reduces the potential for the LIC to trade at a discount to NTA.

Conclusion: the 'free' option may not be a free lunch

LIC investors need to understand that so called 'free' options may not necessarily end up delivering them with any value as the historical experience has shown many options expire worthless. Investors who sell IPO options on listing may lock in a gain that helps offset IPO costs, however, they forgo any potential upside if the LIC succeeds in growing NTA before the option expiry date. When buying LIC shares on-market, check to see if there are any options on issue and whether the exercise price is at a discount to NTA. If so, this will result in dilution when the options are exercised. The market price of LICs with large option overhangs can tend to trade at a discount to NTA until the options are exercised or lapse. The table above shows options outstanding for all new LICs listed since January 2013. This is not a comprehensive list of all LIC options outstanding as some existing LICs, including WAM Active (ASX:WAA) and Westoz Investment Company (ASX:WIC) have issued shareholders with bonus options.

The final word goes to Gareth Brown of Forager Funds Management. Forager listed its Australian Shares Fund (ASX:FOR) on the ASX in December 2016. As a listed investment trust, we have not included it in our study above. However, we note that it did not issue options to its investors. In response to investor questions as to whether it would be issuing options, Gareth wrote an article highlighting the key issues surrounding options and reminded investors that, “There is, after all, no such thing as a free lunch.”

 

Peter Rae is Supervisory Analyst at Independent Investment Research. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

RELATED ARTICLES

What is happening with LIC dividends?

LIC reporting season wrap for 2017

Four bubbly market pockets show heightened risk for investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Latest Updates

Retirement

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Interviews

Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?

Compliance

D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.

Shares

Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.

Retirement

Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.