Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 87

Making your SMSF business a saleable practice

With the advent of new licencing rules and the focus on the rapid growth of SMSF’s, many accounting and planning firms are considering what their involvement should be in the SMSF space. Making your business more efficient and perhaps saleable does not necessarily mean you want to, or will, sell it. The area is rapidly changing and staying still and doing nothing may be detrimental to the business value.

Where are you in the value chain?

Before starting to make changes, the first step is to consider where in the SMSF value chain you are, and where you want to be. To me there are three core parts of the value chain for SMSF businesses (ignoring the investing and funds management components):

1. Advice (financial, tax and structural) and information

Do you want your business to offer advice and if so to what extent and what type, who will be your clients and what will they pay for it?

2. Administrative process

This is not tax work, it is the process of keeping details on all transactions as they occur, managing the paperwork, producing minutes, monitoring investment strategies, receiving pension payment contributions as well as receipt of income that is due to the fund etc etc. This includes assisting the trustees with adhering to the SIS Act regulations and rules, and ensuring deeds are updated and the fund complies.

3. Taxation and trustee services

This is the standard BAS and tax work and other ancillary services necessary for the ATO lodgement requirements, plus trustee responsibilities including compliance.

Obviously there are significantly more items in each of these areas, but the key issue is to decide where you want to be in the chain and be true to it and build the practice solution around it. Not being true to it is the biggest mistake that affects the profit of your business.

Understand what ‘best practice’ is and make that your goal, even if you wish to be in the entire value chain. Determine what works for your business and ask how you will profit from the chosen position. Then build the practices, processes and people around the solution you want, not the other way around.

Let your clients know. If you are a trustee, you should ask your provider what they specialise in and what they don’t. Presumption often leads to disappointment.

Some simple steps to take

There are some actions to consider to position the business appropriately:

  • identify the part or parts of the value chain you want to be in
  • write a divisional plan for all sections of your business
  • determine what success means
  • work out your marketing plan
  • decide what a ‘client’ is and how many you need
  • determine how you are going to sell and then deliver the service to clients
  • work out the billing process and the collection of revenues
  • calculate the profit you are targeting
  • report against all of the above regularly.

Is it better to outsource or even sell?

Once you have determined what you are involved in, you should ensure you have referral or outsource partners to deliver the areas you are not involved in. Even if you are not the supplier, every part of the value chain is important to the SMSF trustee.

Outsourcing is not a dirty word. If you want to be in a part of the value chain but do not want to build the internal capability then many firms will white label their service for you. Outsourcing should be an arrangement where the firm delivers to you what you need to deliver to your clients – not the other way around. If an outsourcing arrangements means you end up doing all their work, then you did not get the framework right when contracting the outsourcer. It should be your service, not theirs, so set the parameters to ensure that your business is not burdened by outsourcing.

If you do want to sell your business or a part of your business, put yourself in the shoes of an acquirer and relook at it. Acquirers will pay the most for quality, organised, value chain-orientated businesses. Selling does not necessarily mean you want to get out of this area of business. It may just mean the part of the value chain that you prefer not to do can be sold which frees up cash for other things.

Take a good look at your business and be objective about the skills of your people and what drives you and them. Focussing on the things you don’t do well often means you are taking time away from the things you do do well. Better to concentrate your energies on what you are best at.

 

Andrew Bloore is Chief Executive Officer at SuperIQ, a leading SMSF administration provider. This article is for general information purposes and does not constitute personal financial advice.

 

  •   6 November 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Sixteen steps in a typical SMSF borrowing

SMSFs can lend to some relatives

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.