Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 17

Michael Porter plans to take aim at investment managers


Professor Michael Porter is a committed capitalist, and about as hardline as you can get. So why has he seemingly dive-bombed out of the clouds to champion the role and obligations of business in society? Why does he get excited about Nestle’s support of rural development, Cisco’s partnering with public institutions to provide online curricula, teacher training and professional development for instructors and Wal-Mart’s supply chain re-invention, cutting energy costs, emissions and engaging with local suppliers?

Start thinking about 'Shared Value'

The answer lies in business model innovation: it’s the way companies will get ahead and create real business value in the future and, at the same time, address society’s pressing needs. This type of innovation is called ‘Shared Value’ and it is increasingly being applied to improve competitive positioning and financial performance. This may come across as idle curiosity that hardly warrants keeping a fund trustee awake at night. However, it is likely to spawn new conversations about the effectiveness of trustee boards.

I’ve just returned from Boston and four days of intensive work discussing Shared Value implementation with companies and practitioners from all around the world, including Colombia, India, Philippines, Canada, Czech Republic, Brazil, Australia, Italy, Hong Kong, Singapore, US, UK, Costa Rica, Mexico, Korea, Japan and Chile. We rubbed shoulders with Professor Michael Porter, Mark Kramer of FSG and the Chairman of Nestle, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, at the Global Shared Value Summit. It marked a pivotal moment in the development of the Shared Value field (refer or an article of mine if the topic is completely new to you).

Where corporate social responsibility is mostly about licence-to-operate or meeting basic community standards, Shared Value is about creating value for both business (financial) and society (impact). It’s proactive, not reactive. For example, pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk embarked on physician training and patient education on diabetes in China many years ago. It estimates that it has improved patient life years of those who use its products and services by 80%, while increasing its market share from below 40% to 63% in the second largest insulin market in the world.

This highlights that it’s not ‘touchy-feely’ stuff: it can lead to market dominance. In fact, you might say this is just good business, where long-term plans are executed well. It is, but we all know that the investment chain is deeply flawed, and analysts struggle to understand and attribute value to these strategies before the earnings are proven, which means that capital is allocated inefficiently.

Too much attention on short-terms

Nestle Chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe noted that he refuses to publish quarterly earnings because one quarter has little bearing on the likelihood of his company living up to its market Price/Earnings ratio. He went further, and cited investment analysts as the root of the short-termist problem. Michael Porter and Mark Kramer, who wrote their seminal paper entitled Creating Shared Value in 2011, agree that vast improvements in the capital supply chain are required. At the Global Summit, Porter revealed that he and Kramer intend to challenge investment managers in a paper due out in early 2014.

In Australia, APRA statistics show that 74% of superannuation fund members have more than 15 years to retirement, and the majority of this group has more than 30 years to go. In theory, this is the average investment horizon that fund trustees should be adopting. But we all know, even if we don’t say it in public, that trustees become quite preoccupied with this year’s earnings rate, and fund comparisons are typically done on 3, 5 or sometimes 7-year timeframes. Have you ever heard vigorous debate about 20-year earnings? And then, to make matters worse, by the time the money gets in the hands of investment managers, annual bonus potential is flashing so brightly that the investment horizon for liquid, traded investments is more like 1-3 years at best. I know, because I’ve worked in the system and was partly complicit with it.

I have sympathy for companies that get hauled into a short-term earnings mindset, because flaws in the structure of our investment chain push them in this direction. Mike Hirst, managing director of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, bravely took a stand against analysts in 2011, citing the same issue as Brabeck-Lemathe of Nestle. At the time, it was a mere blip in the investment conversation and then everyone merrily resumed business as usual.

Here’s the crux of the issue. For all of the back-patting that goes on in the world of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues, have fund trustees really addressed the core problem of misaligned interests between their members’ investment requirements and the incentives of investment managers? There is a lot of puffery, but little substance. When is a manager going to be fired for having a short-term incentive system and replaced with one that has a longer-term system? A handful of investment managers have addressed this, with seven year bonus assessment periods as an example, but they are the exception. It should be priority number one.

In relation to Shared Value, we are seeing a groundswell of interest and application of the concept from innovative companies and this trend is set to continue. It will be a process of internal challenge and discovery for many of them. As yet, there is no prescriptive set of rules, but there are principles and methods that they can use to evaluate their core assets, needs and challenges. They will find where the key social intersection points exist and create strategies that drive financial results in concert with a positive societal impact.

Targetting investors and trustees

From a financial performance perspective, expect to see companies who get this right markedly outperform their peers. And because it takes time to get it right – Nestle is in its seventh year of implementation – the advantages created will be sustained for longer periods of time. It’s hard to copy overnight. My main prediction is that, in the next 10 years, we will see the dispersion of company returns increase significantly and there will be many fast and slow declines.

We will have to wait and see how deeply Porter and Kramer sink their teeth into the investment community. I suspect they will soon realise that the best way to influence investment managers is through their major clients, being superannuation and pension fund trustees. It is likely to start a new and exciting level of dialogue that will bring institutional shareholders closer to leaders in business innovation. However, it will also be confronting to those who are comfortable with the status quo.

Phil Preston is a speaker, facilitator and innovation practitioner, and is a former global credit research head at Colonial First State Global Asset Management.


Leave a Comment:



Through the looking-glass: what counts is not tied to an index

ESG by new means, to new ends

Top 10 ESG issues for 2019


Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Are they the four most-costly words in investing?

A surprisingly high percentage of respondents believe 'This Time is Different'. They may be in for a tough time if history repeats as we have seen plenty of asset bubbles before. Do we have new rules for investing?

Investment strategies

Firstlinks survey: the first 100 tips for young investors

From the hundreds of survey responses, we have compiled a sample of 100 and will publish more next week. There are consistent themes in here from decades of mistakes and successes.


What should the next generation's Australia look like?

An unwanted fiscal drain will fall on generations of Australians who have seen their incomes and wealth stagnate, having missed the property boom and entered the workforce during a period of flatlining real wages.


Bank results scorecard: who deserves the gold stars?

The forecasts were wrong. In COVID, banks were expected to face falling house prices, high unemployment and a lending downturn. In the recovery, which banks are awarded gold stars based on the better performance?

Exchange traded products

In the beginning, there were LICs. Where are they now?

While the competing structure, ETFs, has increased in size far quicker in recent years, LICs remain an important part of the listed trust sector. There are differences between Traditional and Trading LICs.


Should you bank on the Westpac buy-back?

Westpac has sent out details of its buy-back and readers have asked for an explanation. It is not beneficial for all investors and whether this one works for some depends on where the bank sets the final price.

Investment strategies

Understanding the benefits of rebalancing

Whether they know it or not, most investors use of version of a Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) to create an efficient portfolio mix of different asset classes, but the benefits of rebalancing are often overlooked.


Six stocks positioned well for a solid but volatile recovery

The rotation to economic recovery favouring value stocks continues but risks loom on the horizon. What lessons can be drawn from reporting season and what are the trends as inflation appears in parts of business?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.