Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 606

Navigating SMSF property compliance

Property investment within SMSFs remains a popular strategy for building retirement wealth. Navigating SMSF property compliance, however, requires a holistic approach to ensure that SMSFs operate within the legal framework administered by the ATO and ASIC.

One of the problems is that SMSF trustees investing in property do not appreciate how the superannuation rules interact. Areas that can cause the most concern are the sole purpose test, the non-arm’s length income (NALI) provisions and property development.

The sole purpose test

The sole purpose test lies at the heart of a complying SMSF. It mandates that an SMSF must be maintained solely to provide retirement benefits to its members or their dependents in the event of a member’s death.

Until then, SMSF assets must not be misused for personal or business purposes unrelated to retirement benefits.

Breaches of the sole purpose test can have severe repercussions because an SMSF can risk losing its complying status and be subject to higher tax rates.

Non-compliance may arise from various scenarios, such as:

  1. occupying residential property by a related party for personal purposes
  2. undertaking property development activities where transactions are not at arm’s length
  3. not leasing business real property at market rates if used by related parties

Where the trustees of an SMSF are involved in property development ventures in various capacities, they must demonstrate that their decision-making is solely pursuing the retirement purpose of the SMSF and is not influenced by other goals or objectives concerning those business or other entities.

Non-arm’s length income (NALI)

NALI is another critical area of property compliance for SMSFs. The NALI provisions target income derived from arrangements not conducted on commercial terms. The provisions act as a powerful deterrent against arrangements that could unfairly increase member entitlements.

Where income is classified as NALI, it is taxed at the highest marginal rate instead of the concessional superannuation tax rate of 15%.

Identifying NALI involves examining transactions to ensure they are conducted on arm’s length terms. For example, if an SMSF acquires an asset for less than its market value or receives income under non-commercial terms, such arrangements may be deemed non-arm’s length triggering the NALI provisions.

ATO flags property development issues

NALI provisions are particularly relevant in the context of property development projects. The ATO has flagged concerns about property development arrangements where income gets diverted to SMSFs through non-arm’s length dealings.

For instance, SMSFs may hold direct or indirect interests in entities that invest in property development projects that engage in non-arm’s length transactions, such as entering into loans with related parties at a 0% interest rate, to maximise profits.

No specific prohibitions prevent an SMSF from investing directly or indirectly in property development. It can be a legitimate investment for SMSFs if the fund’s property development activities comply with the superannuation legislation.

The ATO, however, is concerned about the structure of certain schemes and arrangements that divert income into super, creating potential breaches of the sole purpose test, other SIS issues and NALI.

The ATO has provided guidance to SMSFs through its regulatory updates cautioning that care needs to be taken by SMSF trustees.

Joint ventures

The ATO has affirmed that a joint venture (JV) agreement involving related parties is an ‘in-house asset’. As a result, the SMSF must hold a proprietary interest in any real property being developed so that the ATO is comfortable with the SMSF investment being ‘in’ that property and not an investment ‘in’ the related party.

One of the leading indicators that the investment may be an in-house asset is that the fund provides capital for the joint venture and has no other rights than receiving a return on the final investment. The ATO has flagged that this will depend on the terms of the JV.

Where outside influences affect the trustee’s decision, such as ceasing to pay a pension to make a cash injection into a struggling property development venture, a contravention of the sole purpose test may occur.

The SMSF should not be involved in ensuring the success of a property development joint venture at its peril.

Ungeared entities

Investing in ungeared entities is another area where compliance with the requirements is complex. Ensuring the ungeared entity does not borrow, all transactions are at arm’s length, any related party acquisitions are at market value, and the entity does not operate a business can avoid the investment becoming an in-house asset. Once an in-house asset, the investment can never be returned to its former exempt status, even if the trustee fixes the issue/s that caused the assets to cease meeting the relevant conditions.

It can be difficult, therefore, for SMSFs to meet and maintain these conditions while undertaking property development investments.

Special purpose vehicle

The ATO has now set a higher bar for property development schemes by focusing on a 'controlling mind'. It makes the decisions for one or more property development groups by selecting the project and establishing an SPV who are typically the members of the fund.

The ATO has adopted a broader approach and is less prescriptive about specific arrangements and structures that could potentially fail SISA compliance with property development.

The ATO has acknowledged that non-arm’s length dealings by any party, with respect to any step in relation to a scheme, can give rise to NALI as defined in the Tax Act.

It gives the ATO a much wider net to cast, which ensures that trustees cannot circumvent the rules and can try to get more money into an SMSF.

Conclusion

Understanding the connections between NALI and the sole purpose test is crucial for an SMSF’s successful and compliant operation.

SMSF trustees must ensure that their funds are maintained exclusively for retirement purposes and that all transactions are conducted on arm’s length terms. Non-compliance with these requirements can lead to severe consequences, including significant tax penalties and potential disqualification.

 

Shelley Banton is Head of Education at ASF Audits. Read more articles in this SMSF property development series.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

Which shares and funds do SMSFs invest in?

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 628

Australian investors have been pouring money into US stocks this year, just as they start to underperform the rest of the world. Is this a sign of things to come? This looks at 50 years of data to see what happens next.

  • 11 September 2025
Exchange traded products

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement

We need a better scheme to help superannuation victims

The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort fails families hit by First Guardian and Shield losses, as well as advisers who are being wrongly blamed for the saga. It’s time for a fair, faster, universal super levy solution.

Investment strategies

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Economy

How bread vs rice moulded history

Does a country's staple crop decide elements of its destiny? The second order effects of being a wheat or rice growing country could explain big differences in culture, societal norms and economic development.

Investment strategies

Small caps are catching fire - for good reason

Small caps just crashed the party like John McClane did in the movie, Die Hard - August delivered explosive gains. With valuations at historic lows, long-term investors could be set for a sequel worth watching.

Defensive growth for an age of deglobalisation, debt and disorder

Today’s new world order appears likely to lead to a lower return, higher risk investment environment. But this asset class looks especially well placed to survive, thrive, and deliver attractive returns to investors.

Economy

Will we choose a four-day working week?

The allure of a four-day week reflects a yearning for more balance in our lives. Yet the reliability of studies touting a lift in productivity is questionable and society may not be ready for such a shift anyway.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.