Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 46

It’s a new year: let’s save more, not procrastinate

And so 2014 is upon us. Amongst all those resolutions, it is common to have one about finances, especially an intention to save more. But alas, common with resolutions made on many different subjects (health, education, family, lifestyle etc), it often proves hard to implement.

Procrastination in savings decisions is all around us. A well-cited piece of academic research is illuminating. In 2001, James Choi and colleagues surveyed staff at a large US firm. Most of those interviewed (68% of respondents) reported that their current savings rate was ‘too low’ relative to their ideal rate. Meanwhile, 24% said that they intended to save more by making additional contributions to their pension plans. The researchers then found that only 3% of respondents actually followed through and increased their level of contributions.

There has been much research into the causes of such procrastination. Reasons include anxiety, not knowing where to start, complexity, the fear of failure, perfectionism, and disorganisation. When it comes to procrastination around financial decisions, and particularly the decision to save more, there are fewer reasons to focus on:

  • Myopia and bounded rationality – many people are extremely short-term focussed and put greater weight on what can be enjoyed now rather than what can be saved for and then enjoyed later. In the research literature this is known as hyperbolic discounting and was first proposed by well-known psychologist researchers Kahneman and Tversky in 1979. There is also bounded self-control: the limited willpower of people to execute their plans.

  • Complexity – complex decisions tend to be deferred for two reasons. One is that people are anxious about making an incorrect decision. The other is hesitating to commit to the work required to make an informed decision or indeed not knowing where to start. In subsequent research Choi and colleagues found clear evidence that complexity of financial decisions can lead to procrastination.

  • Status quo bias and inertia – people may realise that they should change how they act but feel comfortable or trapped in their current behaviour. This effect is magnified if the upfront commitment or effort feels significant. As an example of how this can be overcome in practice, consider how easy weight-loss programmes are to sign up to, generally a simple toll-free phone call.

When it comes to increasing savings, how then can we overcome procrastination? Although not all households are in a position to save more, many are and probably should save more if they wish to avoid a deteriorating lifestyle when retirement arrives.

There are ways in which the industry can help overcome some of these road blocks, and here are a couple of case studies:

  • In a 2012 paper the economist Felipe Kast and colleagues conducted some savings experiments amongst micro-entrepreneurs in Chile. In the first experiment they created self-help peer groups to encourage individuals to stay on track with their savings plans. Savings activities (frequency and amount of deposits) were discussed at group meetings. Those who were involved in the group made 3.5 times as many deposits and saved twice as much as the control group (who also said they wanted to save more but were not assigned to a self-help group). This type of result may not surprise – consider the positive influence of peer groups in areas such as fitness, weight-loss and alcohol abuse.

    In the second experiment the researchers replaced the peer group model with a programme of simple text message reminders. This was also successful, about 80% as successful as the peer group model.

  • In 2004, the researchers Richard Thaler and Shlomo Benartzi created a savings programme in the US entitled “Save More Tomorrow”, which was subsequently patented and given the trademarked acronym “SMarT”. This programme was designed to increase the member contribution rates to pension funds and has been successfully rolled out (now via the authors’ relationship with Allianz) across many pension funds worldwide. 

The essence of the SMarT programme is that plan members pre-commit to allocate a large portion of any future pay rises to increasing their contribution rate. There are three important steps to SMarT that can nearly be thought of as behavioural ‘tricks’.

Firstly, members pre-commit to increasing contribution levels well before they receive any pay rises. This means there is no immediate pain or change in consumption levels, thus getting around some of the myopia and bounded rationality issues discussed above.

Secondly by pre-committing the status quo position is now reversed. Their starting point is that they are a member of the SMarT programme and, while they can exit whenever they like, they tend not to.

Finally because the increased savings levels are funded out of pay rises, they do not anticipate a reduction in income and lifestyle changes (ie remove the issue of loss aversion). Note however that they probably will in reality experience some impact on lifestyle, because pay rises usually partly offset inflation.

The SMarT programme has been extremely successful. In the first example, rolled out across employees of a mid-sized US manufacturing firm, 80% of those who signed up remained in it until the fourth annual pay rise, and their contribution rates rose from 3.5% to 13.6%.

These types of solutions, which help create savings discipline, have applications across the financial planning and the superannuation industries. Perhaps similar models exist already but I have not come across them in Australia. Indeed the opportunity for super funds is obvious: why wait until beyond 2020 to lift member contribution rates to 12% when most of the industry already acknowledges that 12% plus is an appropriate rate?

I also expect that savings club structures could even create greater association with the super fund itself. This is all part of the bigger issue of how far the role of a super fund extends. Surely there is a strong argument that helping members to work around known behavioural biases would be a valuable benefit.

Of course, it goes without saying that I would have written this article sooner, but…

 

David Bell’s independent advisory business is St Davids Rd Advisory. David is working towards a PhD at University of NSW.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 628 with weekend update

Australian investors have been pouring money into US stocks this year, just as they start to underperform the rest of the world. Is this a sign of things to come? This looks at 50 years of data to see what happens next.

  • 11 September 2025
Exchange traded products

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement

We need a better scheme to help superannuation victims

The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort fails families hit by First Guardian and Shield losses, as well as advisers who are being wrongly blamed for the saga. It’s time for a fair, faster, universal super levy solution.

Investment strategies

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Economy

How bread vs rice moulded history

Does a country's staple crop decide elements of its destiny? The second order effects of being a wheat or rice growing country could explain big differences in culture, societal norms and economic development.

Investment strategies

Small caps are catching fire - for good reason

Small caps just crashed the party like John McClane did in the movie, Die Hard - August delivered explosive gains. With valuations at historic lows, long-term investors could be set for a sequel worth watching.

Defensive growth for an age of deglobalisation, debt and disorder

Today’s new world order appears likely to lead to a lower return, higher risk investment environment. But this asset class looks especially well placed to survive, thrive, and deliver attractive returns to investors.

Economy

Will we choose a four-day working week?

The allure of a four-day week reflects a yearning for more balance in our lives. Yet the reliability of studies touting a lift in productivity is questionable and society may not be ready for such a shift anyway.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.