Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 46

It’s a new year: let’s save more, not procrastinate

And so 2014 is upon us. Amongst all those resolutions, it is common to have one about finances, especially an intention to save more. But alas, common with resolutions made on many different subjects (health, education, family, lifestyle etc), it often proves hard to implement.

Procrastination in savings decisions is all around us. A well-cited piece of academic research is illuminating. In 2001, James Choi and colleagues surveyed staff at a large US firm. Most of those interviewed (68% of respondents) reported that their current savings rate was ‘too low’ relative to their ideal rate. Meanwhile, 24% said that they intended to save more by making additional contributions to their pension plans. The researchers then found that only 3% of respondents actually followed through and increased their level of contributions.

There has been much research into the causes of such procrastination. Reasons include anxiety, not knowing where to start, complexity, the fear of failure, perfectionism, and disorganisation. When it comes to procrastination around financial decisions, and particularly the decision to save more, there are fewer reasons to focus on:

  • Myopia and bounded rationality – many people are extremely short-term focussed and put greater weight on what can be enjoyed now rather than what can be saved for and then enjoyed later. In the research literature this is known as hyperbolic discounting and was first proposed by well-known psychologist researchers Kahneman and Tversky in 1979. There is also bounded self-control: the limited willpower of people to execute their plans.

  • Complexity – complex decisions tend to be deferred for two reasons. One is that people are anxious about making an incorrect decision. The other is hesitating to commit to the work required to make an informed decision or indeed not knowing where to start. In subsequent research Choi and colleagues found clear evidence that complexity of financial decisions can lead to procrastination.

  • Status quo bias and inertia – people may realise that they should change how they act but feel comfortable or trapped in their current behaviour. This effect is magnified if the upfront commitment or effort feels significant. As an example of how this can be overcome in practice, consider how easy weight-loss programmes are to sign up to, generally a simple toll-free phone call.

When it comes to increasing savings, how then can we overcome procrastination? Although not all households are in a position to save more, many are and probably should save more if they wish to avoid a deteriorating lifestyle when retirement arrives.

There are ways in which the industry can help overcome some of these road blocks, and here are a couple of case studies:

  • In a 2012 paper the economist Felipe Kast and colleagues conducted some savings experiments amongst micro-entrepreneurs in Chile. In the first experiment they created self-help peer groups to encourage individuals to stay on track with their savings plans. Savings activities (frequency and amount of deposits) were discussed at group meetings. Those who were involved in the group made 3.5 times as many deposits and saved twice as much as the control group (who also said they wanted to save more but were not assigned to a self-help group). This type of result may not surprise – consider the positive influence of peer groups in areas such as fitness, weight-loss and alcohol abuse.

    In the second experiment the researchers replaced the peer group model with a programme of simple text message reminders. This was also successful, about 80% as successful as the peer group model.

  • In 2004, the researchers Richard Thaler and Shlomo Benartzi created a savings programme in the US entitled “Save More Tomorrow”, which was subsequently patented and given the trademarked acronym “SMarT”. This programme was designed to increase the member contribution rates to pension funds and has been successfully rolled out (now via the authors’ relationship with Allianz) across many pension funds worldwide. 

The essence of the SMarT programme is that plan members pre-commit to allocate a large portion of any future pay rises to increasing their contribution rate. There are three important steps to SMarT that can nearly be thought of as behavioural ‘tricks’.

Firstly, members pre-commit to increasing contribution levels well before they receive any pay rises. This means there is no immediate pain or change in consumption levels, thus getting around some of the myopia and bounded rationality issues discussed above.

Secondly by pre-committing the status quo position is now reversed. Their starting point is that they are a member of the SMarT programme and, while they can exit whenever they like, they tend not to.

Finally because the increased savings levels are funded out of pay rises, they do not anticipate a reduction in income and lifestyle changes (ie remove the issue of loss aversion). Note however that they probably will in reality experience some impact on lifestyle, because pay rises usually partly offset inflation.

The SMarT programme has been extremely successful. In the first example, rolled out across employees of a mid-sized US manufacturing firm, 80% of those who signed up remained in it until the fourth annual pay rise, and their contribution rates rose from 3.5% to 13.6%.

These types of solutions, which help create savings discipline, have applications across the financial planning and the superannuation industries. Perhaps similar models exist already but I have not come across them in Australia. Indeed the opportunity for super funds is obvious: why wait until beyond 2020 to lift member contribution rates to 12% when most of the industry already acknowledges that 12% plus is an appropriate rate?

I also expect that savings club structures could even create greater association with the super fund itself. This is all part of the bigger issue of how far the role of a super fund extends. Surely there is a strong argument that helping members to work around known behavioural biases would be a valuable benefit.

Of course, it goes without saying that I would have written this article sooner, but…

 

David Bell’s independent advisory business is St Davids Rd Advisory. David is working towards a PhD at University of NSW.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', with a focus on Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. As more people enter retirement with a mortgage, we must link housing and retirement policies.

Property

Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Property

Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? The ‘average’ mortgagee can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.

Shares

10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.