Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 170

The other problem with volatility

Investment volatility is the talk of the town in the wake of the Brexit vote, nervousness about future US leadership and slowdowns in key sectors (commodities) and countries (China). Volatility is a challenge for anyone managing a portfolio. For example, large superannuation funds must manage their members’ capital in a way that helps their members answer questions like: When can I retire? How much can I expect to have to live on during retirement? How much investment risk do I need to accept in my portfolio to meet my retirement goals?

The investment journey

Discussions about the damage volatility can do to an equity portfolio tend to focus on the investor’s journey and how to smooth ups and downs to increase the investor’s confidence and reduce fear of loss, or serious diminution of capital. This is described as the ‘journey problem’ and a number of solutions are emerging to address this.

Simple responses include moving to risk-adjusted investments and favouring equity portfolios with innate defensive characteristics (e.g. investments with counter-cyclical or inflation-hedging qualities).

Sophisticated investors are increasingly considering more complex, targeted solutions like purchasing downside, tail risk protection, or volatility dampening. This can entail investing in derivatives that pay off during market downturn events or running a volatility strategy where the value moves in the opposite direction to the underlying equity portfolio.

What these responses are missing is the fact that volatility creates not just a journey problem for the investor but also what we might call a ‘destination problem’, where volatility creates a phenomenon called the ‘variance drain’.

Variance drain is a drag on returns. It can be illustrated in the following example where we compare two hypothetical $10 million equity strategies. The two strategies have delivered the same arithmetic return at the end of a five-year period of 15%. One has experienced no volatility (‘No vol’ in the table), while the other has experienced volatility (‘Vol’) over this time period.


Click to enlarge.
Source: A Wide-Angle Lens View of Volatility: Managing the Journey and the Destination, Parametric Research, July 2016.

We see here that relative to the No vol portfolio, on a geometric (compounding, linked) return basis, there is a return drag from volatility (in our example) of 61 basis points, or $60,777, over the five-year period. Larger portfolios, higher returns, higher volatility or longer time periods can all potentially increase this ‘leakage’. The return drag from volatility is akin to other hidden leakages in implementation like fees, taxes and transaction costs that can furtively and assiduously eat away at an equity portfolio’s value over time.

Watch the journey and the destination

The principle of variance drain should remind superannuation funds and other sophisticated investors seeking to address volatility that it is a two-dimensional problem. A solution which simply removes some risks on the downside may indeed solve the journey problem but the costs associated with this solution can mean that the investor’s destination (in a superannuation fund’s case, member retirement balances) is compromised.

Portfolio managers need to avoid the return drag from either living with volatility or addressing it in a costly way, as well as smoothing the journey. While solutions which look to solve both problems are few and far between, they do exist and are generally constructed to reduce volatility in a cost-sensitive way; for example, by using out-of-the-money rather than in-the-money derivatives. They also seek to find a replacement source of returns to continue the important task of building the overall value of the portfolio. Such strategies take a ‘wide-angle lens’ view of volatility and can be found in the hands of a specialist implementation manager.

 

Raewyn Williams is Director of Research & After-Tax Solutions at Parametric, a US-based investment advisor. Parametric is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of the provision of financial services to wholesale clients as defined in the Act and is regulated by the SEC under US laws, which may differ from Australian laws. This information is not intended for retail clients, as defined in the Act. Parametric is not a licensed tax agent or advisor in Australia and this does not represent tax advice. Additional information is available at www.parametricportfolio.com/au.

 

5 Comments
b0b555
August 27, 2016

Isn't this just one example of many possible scenarios, many of which would produce higher returns for the Vol portfolio?

stephen
August 25, 2016

I love it how volatility is used as a catchphrase to explain underperformance, when in fact vols are REALLY low right now (and correlation incredibly high). Notwithstanding yesterday's blip, vols have been crushed to sub-10 on SPX. If you don't believe me then check the VIX. Please don't use it as an excuse. Yes brexit happened, but that was two months ago. Move on.

Alex
August 25, 2016

Dave is right that 'professionals' use log or continuous compounding returns or IRR which removes the apparent anomaly, but this should not take attention from the main problem raised.

Dave
August 25, 2016

The maths trick is well known but if you compare two investments with the same IRR or compound return you do not get the problem - most professional investors would forecast compound returns rather than average returns.

Gary M
August 25, 2016

Good message. Spot on with the core problem – that is that ‘volatility’ and ‘risk’ tolerance has for the past 20 years been a question of: “you’ll get your 8% return (or $100k pension) but can you tolerate the ups and downs along the way to get there?” That is a horrible understatement of the real risk. The real question is “there is a good chance you won’t get your 8% return or your $100k pension – how do you feel about living on $70k instead?” So it is right to say the real problem is a ‘destination problem’ and not merely a ‘journey problem’

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Does currency hedging provide an edge?

Red pill or blue pill? Navigating the matrix of fixed income

Understanding foreign exchange risk

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.