Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 170

Portrait of a modern investor

What is the biggest threat to investment savings and the modern investor today? You’d be forgiven if you answered volatile markets and anemic growth when in fact, it’s investors themselves.

The modern investor isn't just nervous, they’re deeply conflicted. Our recent survey (the Natixis Global Survey of Individual Investors included 7,100 global investors of which 300 were in Australia) shows how deep this conflict runs. Investors say they want to grow assets but don’t want to take on risk. They value passive investments for their low fees but mistakenly translate that to mean less risk. They want to evaluate their investment performance based on personal goals but then admit they don’t have them. They understand more of the responsibility for retirement is theirs but drastically underestimate the cost. And the list goes on.

Why is this important? Because left unresolved, these conflicts reduce savings and investment and deter people from doing what they need to do today to provide for a stable future tomorrow.

Cautious, but searching for double-digit returns

A majority of individuals we surveyed call themselves ‘cautious’ investors. But in the same breath, they said they needed returns of 8.6% above inflation to meet their goals – which in today’s world would expose investors to significant volatility. Not many are likely to stomach the risk when 67% of investors say they’d take safety over investment performance. What investors need is education about risk and help understanding just how much they are willing to take on.

See low fees and think less risk

When it comes to passive index investments, a surprising number of investors wrongly assume that lower fees mean less risk. Some 55% think index strategies are less risky and help minimise losses. But by their very nature, passive investments have no built-in risk management. When markets rise, they generate market returns. When markets decline, they generate market losses. Passive strategies have a place in portfolios, right alongside active investments, but investors need to understand what they own. Professional investors get it. Our annual survey of institutional investors found they mix in passive to keep overall fees down, but they turn to active management to generate returns and provide risk management.

Goal oriented, but lacking clear goals

Seven out of 10 Australian investors claim to evaluate their investment performance based on personal goals. But that seems unlikely for many when less than half (45%) say they have clear financial goals in the first place. Fewer still say they have a financial plan (34%). The first step forward for any investor should be to write down specific goals and work with a financial professional to help set a realistic plan.

Understand retirement, but underestimate what’s needed

Government benefits and employer pensions once shared equal duty with personal savings for retirement funding, but 77% of Australian investors now believe the responsibility of shoring up retirement is increasingly theirs. The problem is that few realise just how much this responsibility really adds up to. They believe on average they will need to replace only 70% of current income in retirement – this is on the lower side of the 70% to 80% most experts recommend, but above the global average expectation of 64%. Investors need to consider longevity risk as their biggest challenge. Determining how much to save needs to begin with a serious accounting of how much they will actually need to live in retirement.

Investors have much to resolve, but the good news is that they recognise the value of professional advice and believe it is worth the fee. Just under two thirds say individuals who get professional advice are more likely to meet their goals. However, investors today have a clear vision of what they want from an adviser – and it’s not a hot stock tip. They want to become more informed investors. They want solutions for managing risk. They want help setting goals and plans, and they want a more collaborative relationship with their adviser.

One out of every two investors globally thinks the investment industry is not putting their interests first. If we are going to rebuild that trust, we need to get on the same side of the table with investors. We need to put risk first in the investment discussion so they understand what to realistically expect from their investments. We need to stop talking about investment products and start talking about personal portfolios designed to fit their unique goals. It’s our responsibility to help today's modern investor make more informed decisions about their financial future.


David Goodsell is executive director of the Natixis Center for Investor Insight. This article is general information only and does not constitute any offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities and no investment advice or recommendation. Investment involves risks.


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.