Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 139

Six challenges for robo-advisers

We believe robo-advisers will be paradigm-changing, but that doesn’t mean they have a free pass to success. They must overcome six significant challenges if they are to evolve into profitable financial services businesses:

1. Changing perceptions of financial advice

For a large group of consumers, investment advisers are self-interested and greedy, financial markets are rigged and corrupt and their money is better off being self-invested into real estate, gold and other real assets. This widely-held perception of the finance industry is deserved.

There have been far too many financial services scandals that prove these theories, from an outright fraud like Bernie Madoff through to a local adviser churning an unsophisticated client through a procession of high brokerage-fee products. Meanwhile, the global markets collapse of 2008 left many investors wary and untrusting of the entire financial market framework. They would rather buy real estate that they can see and touch.

The financial advice industry has failed to make a convincing argument to justify its value to consumers. The industry has struggled with the intangibility of advice, the potential uncertainties of outcomes should markets crash and perceptions of greed among the people running the ‘system’. The impact is that most people don’t want to pay for financial advice.

2. Establishing trust

In financial planning, human interaction has traditionally been vitally important. As many a salesperson knows, selling something that is intangible requires the establishment of trust. This is problematic, because trust in the planning industry is low.

Trust is defined as “a psychological state comprising the intention to accept vulnerability based upon positive expectations of the intentions or behaviours of another” (Rousseau, Sitkin, Burt, & Camerer, 1998).

Repeated surveys around the world show financial advisers sit towards the bottom of the trust ladder. How do robo-advisers show they are trustworthy? To show you are trustworthy, you must display the behaviours that will lead people to trust you.

Three important requirements are:

  • Competence in the matters in which competence is claimed and required
  • Reliability, by doing the things as expected and promised, and
  • Honesty and transparency in dealings with customers.

To convince the broad public that it can be trusted, a robo-adviser will be required to invest in processes and marketing to tell the story of how and why they are trustworthy.

Established brands and the large end of town already have customer bases into which to market to achieve scale while also having the marketing budgets and communication channels needed to attract new business to a robo-adviser.

3. Advice and guidance gaps

‘Advice gaps’ arise when people who could benefit from financial advice do not receive it because:

  • Their level of assets is too low to viably warrant the attention of a financial adviser, or
  • They are not prepared to pay a fee to receive advice.

In the US, the desire to maximise planner profits makes accessing a financial planner high compared with the rest of the world. US advisers focus almost exclusively on what would be regarded as high wealth clients in the rest of the world.

In the UK, financial advice is generally more readily available to the middle classes – what might be termed the ‘mass affluent’. The dollar figure required to access a basic service is driven significantly by the regulatory framework. Ironically, rules that were introduced to protect consumers now deny many of those people any service at all as the costs of regulatory compliance are too high to make them financially viable clients.

It is, perhaps, a logical conclusion to see robo-advisers as the solution to the advice gap as they have scalability and can service customers at low cost. Some people see robo-advisers ‘democratising’ financial advice, making it available to all.

By definition, those in advice gaps have lower investable asset balances, which means, per customer, lower income for the robo operator. Robo-advisers need profitable clients, but to acquire them as clients they need to invest serious marketing money, which is why existing big players have advantages over new entrant start-ups no matter how well funded. The exception is perhaps those providing a B2B robo white-label platform for existing distributors.

4. Economic influences

Around the world, wealth is being squeezed into upper economic groups, with corresponding falls in income and wealth for the middle and lower economic groups.

The loss of the middle range investor means that an increasing number of service providers are marketing to a shrinking pool of affluent investors, albeit that each of those customers comes bearing a larger pool of assets.

At the same time, there might be increased demand for robo-advisers that focus on providing budgeting tools and cash-flow forecasting, as these issues are of more significance to lower economic groups than questions of investment.

5. Cost of acquiring clients

Robo-advisers need clients to operate and the cost of acquiring (CAC) clients in financial services is high.

To us, this is the elephant in the robo-adviser room that is seldom discussed – which we believe is a strategic failure of the highest order.

Acquisition costs include the costs of initially finding a prospect and then converting those prospects into clients, with the inevitable attrition rate that those conversions incur. When total costs are compared to clients gained the results can be surprisingly high. Lucian Camp calculates the cost of acquiring a client in the UK to be around £200 (US$312).

This cost is beyond the means of many advisory firms, which is why they grow slowly – largely through word-of-mouth referral. In the past, they might have relied on product manufacturers and distributors to provide them with marketing support. Under new regulations in the UK, such supports are now largely no longer possible. But they continue to thrive in the US marketplace. In a world where former specialties have become commoditised, being able to make a financial product or service no longer makes you special as it once did.

Where, in the past, you may have been able to extract an economic rent because you occupied a position of advantage, market forces have now equalised you. Today, the ability (knowledge) and capacity (cash-flow) to quickly market financial products to scale is what separates successful financial services businesses from the ‘also-rans’.

It does not matter if you arrive at the marketplace with a better mousetrap if that trap is hidden where the mice cannot find it. Cheese – in the form of marketing, advertising and promotion – will help to attract them. But cheese isn’t cheap. Robo-advisers are very good at servicing customers, but do nothing to attract customers.

6. Behavioural biases

It is human nature to want it now. But it is also human nature to make plans for the future, including saving money. Of course, the two natures quickly come into conflict. You want a holiday now – but spending the money will reduce your pension in 30 years’ time.

More often than not your ‘present’ self will defeat your ‘future’ self. The future loss is so far away that it is diminished, but the present benefit is NOW! “Pack your swimsuit, honey, we are going to the beach.”

There is good reason to believe that robo-advice systems might do a much better job than human systems at helping people confront and manage this ‘present-day’ bias, by allowing them to visualise the impact of financial decisions made now projected into the future.

As ever when there are challenges, those who are successful will find new solutions and build the scale critical for success, while many others will fall by the side.

 

Paul Resnik is a co-founder of FinaMetrica, which provides psychometric risk tolerance testing tools and investment suitability methodologies to financial advisers in 23 countries.

 

5 Comments
Allan Teh
January 02, 2016

Robo can never replaces human advisers!

Kenny Thing
January 02, 2016

The point on the flexibility of robo advisory is a good one, Bartosz Golba. Financial planners help their clients to navigate the market volatility and the discipline to keep the monies invested.

Bartosz Golba
January 02, 2016

I agree with all the listed challenges, although I am of the opinion that actually they are not unique to robo-advisors. Traditional financial planners / advisors have to face all the mentioned challenges if they wish to be profitable.

In my opinion, as I argued already in a few discussions, the biggest challenge for robo-advisors is to successfully onboard wealthier individuals. Then the high cost of client acquisition would not be such a big problem.

As far as behavioral biases are concerned, robo-advisors indeed can do better than humans. But we can't forget that robo-platforms flexibility (you can withdraw the money whenever you want without any penalties), which can be seen as one of the great advantages, enables customers to make quick and wrong investment decisions basing on their emotions. This is something automated platforms providers have to think about as well, when developing their solutions.

Kenny Thing
January 02, 2016

Very interesting insights. Another factor that may help drive adoption of robo-advice is consumer driven regulations toward more transparency and lower cost of financial advisory.

Paul Meleng
December 19, 2015

Great piece of work Paul R. Thanks.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Looking deeper than the home page of roboadvice

FoFA, the Failure of Financial Advice, Take 2

Has FoFA become the Failure of Financial Advice?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.