Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 177

When SMSF members head for the exit

Establishment and growth of SMSFs receives plenty of coverage in the media, but relatively little attention is paid to the other end of the SMSF life cycle – when an SMSF is no longer appropriate for one or more of its members. ATO data shows about 1,000 SMSFs are wound up each month.

The increasing number of Australians living with dementia and Alzheimer’s has encouraged some SMSF members to look at alternatives and there are circumstances where the members may need an exit strategy. The three main alternatives are:

  • rollover to a retail or industry fund
  • convert to a Small APRA Fund (SAF), as discussed previously in Cuffelinks here.
  • pay benefits to members and close down the SMSF.

More on these choices later.

Why do some trustees wind up their SMSF?

It is important to consider the attitudes and abilities of the remaining SMSF members if one or more members die or are no longer able to be a trustee, perhaps due to declining physical or mental health. Will the surviving members want to continue the fund? Do they have the necessary skills, time and interest levels?

An exit strategy may also be needed due to the fund’s investments. Does the fund have illiquid or indivisible assets that may affect its ability to make benefit payments?

The following ‘Ds’ are all trigger events that may lead to the need for an exit strategy:

Death and disability: The payment of a death or disability benefit is an important issue if indivisible or illiquid assets are involved, or if there are unique assets the family unit wishes to retain.

Dementia: If an SMSF trustee loses mental capacity they are legally unable to continue in the role of trustee and therefore unable to be a member of an SMSF. However, there are no legal issues with a person who lacks mental capacity being a member of a retail fund or a SAF.

Disinterest: Loss of interest can be a driving factor for many SMSF trustees who are skilled and committed at the outset but may become less interested and able as they age.

Divorce: When couples in an SMSF separate it is often highly desirable for each member to make their own future super arrangements. Running an SMSF with trustees who are not on good terms is difficult at best and often impossible. Additionally, if a family law split is being made from the SMSF, it is possible to take advantage of the capital gains tax (CGT) exemptions when moving one of the parties to a SAF or a new SMSF. However, this is generally not available if the family law split is paid to a retail fund.

Departed residents: If an SMSF member becomes a non-resident, it can be difficult for the SMSF to retain its eligibility for concessional tax treatment. There are generally no issues for departed members in retail funds. SAFs can also have non-resident members, however the members can generally not contribute.

Disqualified persons: A disqualified person is either an undischarged bankrupt or someone who has been convicted of an offence involving dishonesty. A disqualified person cannot legally be a trustee and is therefore unable to be an SMSF member. There are no issues with a disqualified person being a member of a retail fund or a SAF.

The three exit strategies have different tax outcomes, different abilities to retain private assets and different administrative requirements.

1. Rolling over to a retail or industry fund

Rolling over to a retail or industry fund is a CGT event. Any gains will be realised and tax payable. If capital losses exist, they cannot be carried forward. If members are in pension phase this may not be an issue, however it may be a significant cost if the fund is still in accumulation phase.

The range of investment options may also be a significant factor. It is important to compare the SMSF’s existing investments with those available in a new fund. If the SMSF has assets that cannot be accepted, how do the members feel about disposing of the assets? This may be an issue if the SMSF has real property, collectables or shares in private companies. If the SMSF has a residential apartment on the Gold Coast, the SMSF members may be perfectly comfortable in selling the property to facilitate a move to a retail fund. However, if it’s a property that SMSF members are running the family business from, its sale may be highly undesirable.

For members who commenced a pension before 1 January 2015, any Centrelink deeming exemption will be lost if the pension is rolled over to a new fund. This may result in a reduction in age pension.

2. Converting to a small APRA fund

A SAF is an SMSF with a professional licensed trustee. The professional trustee manages the fund for the benefit of the members and is responsible for all of the fund’s compliance, regulatory reporting, and administration.

This conversion can avoid CGT entirely. The existing trustees simply retire and appoint the professional trustee. The fund (the tax paying entity) continues uninterrupted and does not dispose of any assets; there is simply a change in trustee.

Moving to a SAF may also help members who wish to retain unique investments. Different SAF trustees will have their own rules in respect of allowable assets, however a SAF will be far more likely to accept a unique asset than a retail or industry fund. Provided that the total fund investments are relatively diversified, it is common for SAFs to allow holdings of real property, private company shares and collectables.

Importantly, converting an SMSF to a SAF does not have any implications for the grandfathering of Centrelink deeming on pensions.

3. Paying benefits and closing the SMSF

If the members have met a condition of release it is possible to simply pay the member benefits and wind-up the SMSF. Sufficient funds will be retained for wind-up costs and taxes and a final return will be lodged.

Naturally, the member needs to compare the tax-effective environment of superannuation with other forms of investments. This decision is often balanced with the expense of running an SMSF that has been paying a pension for many years and now has a relatively low account balance. There may also be Centrelink implications of cashing benefits from an SMSF.

An exit strategy may not be something that SMSF members think about often, but there are a number of instances in which one may be required. Taking steps to identify the potential trigger events and available strategies will assist members to better achieve their retirement goals, even when things don’t go to plan.

 

Julie Steed is Senior Technical Services Manager at Australian Executor Trustees. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

3 Comments
Ramani
October 23, 2016

A very useful article, as Australians with SMSFs living longer age, and face declining faculties. There is no check (annual or otherwise) that SMSF trustees continue to remain able and willing to perform their onerous roles, and do not run the risk of being led by the nose by a dominant trustee. Anecdotal evidence indicates this may apply in some cases. With culpability test protection unavailable to SMSFs, the consequences of significant breaches could be a whopping half of the assets.

The ATO is deficient in its regulation as it does not alert SMSFs about this structural risk. Absent immediate action, the dominant SMSF sector risks an implosion with systemic consequences for stability and confidence. My joint paper at 2012 the UNSW Research Colloquium 'SMSFs: Elephant in mouse's guise' canvassed this at length.

A question: is there any retail or industry fund that would accept the existing investments of a SMSF rolling over into them without having to sell and rebuy, subject to required investment strategy due diligence? This might make it easy for some SMSFs. My enquiries indicate this option is not available.

Eric
October 13, 2016

In the section dealing with SAFs and their costs [via the link to previous SAF article in Cuffelinks]. For such funds holding greater than $750,000 it suggests a Management Fee of 0.22% but in the table showing estimates of total cost of running an SAF holding $2,000,000 the percentage is over 0.3%. One of the figures appears to be incorrect. This is not a criticism I really appreciate the articles you provide.

Julie Steed
October 13, 2016

Dear Eric,

Thank you for your insightful comments. I am pleased to clarify that the AET trustee management fee is based on a tiered structure. The first $250,000 of fund assets are charged at 1.06%, the next $500,000 are charged at 0.33% and assets above $750,000 are charged at 0.22%. In addition, AET cap the trustee management fee at $7,500 per annum. This affects funds with assets above $2,204,545.

For a fund balance of $1,000,000 the trustee management fee is calculated as:
• ($250,000 x 1.06%) + ($500,000 x 0.33%) + ($250,000 x 0.22%)
• $2,650 + $1,650 + $550 = $4,850

For a fund balance of $3,000,000 the trustee management fee is calculated as:
• ($250,000 x 1.06%) + ($500,000 x 0.33%) + ($2,250,000 x 0.22%)
• $2,650 + $1,650 + $4,950 = $9,250
• but subject to a maximum of $7,500

I have provided a link to the fee calculator on the AET website if you would like any further worked examples: http://www.aetlimited.com.au/__data/assets/excel_doc/0018/225234/SAF_calculator_general_v_3.xls

Cuffelinks has also added this clarification to the original article.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The other self managed super funds

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

How to prevent excessive superannuation balances

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.